The burden and impact of arrhythmia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the burden and predictors of arrhythmias and in-hospital mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related hospitalizations using the nationwide cohort. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) (2010-2014) databases to identify adult COPD hospitalizations with arrhythmia. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using Chi-square and Student's t-test/ANOVA. Predictors of any arrhythmia including AF and in-hospital mortality were evaluated by multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Out of 21,596,342 COPD hospitalizations, 6,480,799 (30%) revealed co-existent arrhythmias including 4,767,401 AF-arrhythmias (22.1%) and 1,713,398 non AF-arrhythmias (7.9%). The AF or non-AF arrhythmia cohort consisted mostly of older (mean age~ 75.8 & 69.1 vs. 67.5 years) white male (53.3% & 51.9% vs. 46.9%) patients compared to those without arrhythmias (p < 0.001). The all-cause mortality (5.7% & 5.2 vs. 2.9%), mean length of stay (LOS) (6.4 & 6.5 vs. 5.3 days), and hospital charges ($52,699.49 & $58,102.39 vs. $41,208.02) were higher with AF and non AF-arrhythmia compared to the non-arrhythmia group (p < 0.001). Comorbidities such as cardiomyopathy (OR 2.11), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.88), valvular diseases (OR 1.60), congestive heart failure (OR 1.48) and pulmonary circulation disorders (OR 1.25) predicted in-hospital arrhythmias. Invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 6.41), cardiogenic shock (OR 5.95), cerebrovascular disease (OR 3.95), septicemia (OR 2.30) and acute myocardial infarction (OR 2.24) predicted higher mortality (p < 0.001) in the COPD-arrhythmia cohort. CONCLUSIONS: About 30% of COPD hospitalizations revealed co-existent arrhythmias (AF 22.1%). All-cause mortality, LOS and hospital charges were significantly higher with arrhythmias. We observed racial and sex-based disparities for arrhythmias and related mortality.

The Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Management and Prediction of Survival in Pancreatic Cancer.

The role of positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (CT) in the management of pancreatic cancer patients has not been clearly established. Although value of PET/CT in the staging of pancreatic cancer is still being debated, several studies pointed to its superior role in determining therapy response, recurrence detection, and survival prediction in comparison to conventional imaging including contrast-enhanced CT. This article reviews the current literature on usefulness of PET/CT in the management of pancreatic cancer patients.

Follow-up FDG PET/CT in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Value to Clinical Assessment and Patient Management.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of each follow-up PET/CT in the clinical assessment of recurrence as well as determining its impact on management in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with NHL who had at least 1 follow-up PET/CT study, 6 months after primary treatment completion, were included. There were 204 eligible NHL patients with 560 follow-up PET/CT scans. The change in management was recorded after each follow-up PET/CT scan in comparison to the management plan before the study. RESULTS: Among the 560 scans, 388 scans (69.3%) were done without clinical suspicion and 172 scans (30.7%) were done with prior clinical suspicion of recurrence. Follow-up scan results suggested disease in 12.4% of the scans performed without clinical suspicion and ruled out disease in 16.3% scans performed with prior clinical suspicion. The management of NHL patients was changed after 37.8% of follow-up scans with prior clinical suspicion of recurrence and after 8.3% of scans in patients without prior clinical suspicion of recurrence. The management of NHL patients was not changed after 50.6% scans with prior clinical suspicion of recurrence of which 23.3% had no treatment before and after the scan and 27.3% had the same treatment continued before and after the scan. CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up FDG PET/CT performed with prior clinical suspicion of recurrence added value to patients with NHL for clinical assessment in 16.3% of the scan times and influenced the management in 37.8% of scan times. The management change was only 8.3% in patients without prior clinical suspicion of recurrence, and hence, surveillance FDG PET/CT in NHL should be avoided.