Current Practices and Challenges in the Management of Complex Renal Stones in Africa: A Scoping Review.

This study reviews the challenges and management strategies for complex renal stones in Africa. Historically viewed as infection or struvite stones, recent studies highlight diverse compositions of staghorn stones. These complex stones pose significant risks, including recurrent urinary tract infections and renal impairment. In the past, conservative management of staghorn stones was associated with high morbidity; thus, surgical intervention was necessary for complete eradication. While percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the standard, it carries notable risks, leading to a shift towards minimally invasive techniques. This study reviews challenges and management practices for complex renal stones and staghorn calculi in African countries, evaluating stone-free rates and associated complications. A scoping review of the literature, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, was performed. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, African Journal Online (AJOL) and Google Scholar, yielding 1,101 articles, but only 11 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. The study included 1,513 patients with 1,582 renal units, predominantly male (67.2%) with an average age of 40.7 years. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was the primary treatment for the majority (71.3%), followed by open surgery (21.9%), laparoscopic surgery (4.1%), and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) (2.7%). The stone clearance rates for PCNL, open surgery, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, and RIRS were 82.8%, 83.7%, 100%, and 92.8%, respectively. Stone sizes ranged between 22 and 80 mm, with 66% being staghorn stones. Complication rates were highest for open surgery (30.8%) and lowest for RIRS (4.7%). Despite PCNL being the global standard, African studies still indicate a high reliance on open surgery, likely due to healthcare infrastructure, resource availability and socioeconomic factors. Enhancing access to urological care and addressing healthcare disparities are imperative for improving staghorn stone management in Africa.

Aortic Size Index Versus Aortic Diameter in the Prediction of Rupture in Women With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) pose significant challenges in clinical management, particularly in female patients, whose unique anatomical and physiological characteristics influence rupture risk. While aortic diameter (AD) has traditionally been the primary metric for predicting rupture, its limitations, especially in women, have spurred exploration into alternative measures such as the aortic size index (ASI). This review examines the anatomy and physiology of AAAs in women, gender-specific challenges in diagnosis and management, and the comparative effectiveness of ASI versus AD in predicting rupture risk. ASI, calculated as AD divided by body surface area (BSA), offers a more nuanced assessment by adjusting for individual body size differences, potentially mitigating gender disparities in rupture rates. Comparative analyses indicate ASI's superiority in predicting adverse aortic events, particularly in women, thereby advocating for its integration into clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. Additionally, emerging techniques such as 3D volumetric measurements and biomechanical assessments show promise in enhancing rupture risk prediction, heralding a shift toward more personalized and effective management strategies for AAA patients.

Diagnostic criteria and scoring systems for thyroid storm: An evaluation of their utility - comparative review.

A thyroid storm is a life-threatening endocrine emergency characterized by severe hyperthyroidism and many systemic manifestations. Prompt recognition and treatment are essential for patient survival. This study evaluates the utility of existing diagnostic criteria and scoring systems for thyroid storm. A comprehensive literature review encompassed articles published up to December 2023. Various diagnostic criteria and scoring systems, such as the Burch-Wartofsky Point Scale and the Japanese Thyroid Association criteria, were critically assessed based on their sensitivity, specificity, and clinical applicability. Our findings reveal that existing diagnostic criteria and scoring systems, although valuable tools, exhibit limitations. They may lack sensitivity in identifying milder cases of thyroid storm or fail to differentiate it from other critical conditions. Furthermore, some criteria rely heavily on subjective clinical Judgment, which can vary among healthcare providers. Future research should focus on refining existing criteria and developing more objective and universally applicable diagnostic tools to address these limitations. Incorporating advanced laboratory markers and modern imaging techniques may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, a standardized scoring system approach could improve clinical practice consistency. In conclusion, while current diagnostic criteria and scoring systems provide a foundation for identifying thyroid storm, their utility has shortcomings. Advancements in diagnostic methods and a collaborative effort to establish standardized criteria are imperative to enhance the accuracy and reliability of thyroid storm diagnosis, ultimately improving patient outcomes.