RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the yield of extensive etiologic workup in lacunar stroke patients. BACKGROUND: As lacunar strokes are infrequently caused by thromboembolism, the clinical relevance of extensive workup for thromboembolic sources is questioned. METHODS: Among consecutive stroke admissions to a single center over 3 years, the 100 cases initially classified as lacunar stroke and a sample of 100 cases classified as non-lacunar ischemic strokes were studied. Review of brain imaging resulted in reclassification of 24 cases, and exclusion of 3 cases, producing a final cohort of 86 confirmed lacunar strokes and 111 confirmed non-lacunar strokes. In each of these cases, results of echocardiographic and vascular imaging studies were evaluated. RESULTS: Echocardiography was performed in 93% of both the lacunar stroke cases and non-lacunar stroke cases. High-risk cardiac embolic sources were found less often in lacunar than in non-lacunar stroke cases (19% versus 34%). Findings potentially requiring anticoagulant therapy were found exclusively in the non-lacunar stroke patients. Vascular imaging studies (computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography) were also performed in similar proportions of lacunar and non-lacunar stroke cases (85% versus 84%). Cerebrovascular occlusions or high-grade stenoses were frequent (62%) in non-lacunar stroke patients but less frequent (25%) in lacunar stroke patients. In the non-lacunar stroke patients, identified vascular lesions were very frequently in a vessel anatomically related to the infarction, but in lacunar stroke patients, this occurred in only 6 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography and vascular imaging studies rarely disclose findings of etiologic relevance, or of likelihood to change management, in patients with lacunar strokes.
