Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 19(2): 110-3, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19390275

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Optimal surgical approach for advanced pediatric appendicectomy remains controversial. We compare the open versus the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: Retrospective case notes review of children operated on for advanced appendicitis between January 2005 and July 2006 was undertaken for length of hospital stay, operating time, wound complications, need for further surgery, and hospital readmission. RESULTS: Forty children were included, 17 were treated with open approach and 23 with laparoscopic approach. There was no conversion from laparoscopic to open approach. Overall complication rate, length of hospital stay, and need for further surgery were similar in both groups. The mean operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group. Wound complications occurred more in the open group. Readmission for gastrointestinal obstruction was noted in the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic approach is safe for advanced appendicitis in children. The outcomes are comparable in both study groups.


Assuntos
Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Apendicectomia/instrumentação , Criança , Proteção da Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino Unido , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Pediatr Surg ; 40(12): 1941-4, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16338324

RESUMO

PURPOSE: It has not been possible so far to differentiate slow transit constipation from functional fecal retention because the existing medical literature lacks data on rectal dimensions for healthy children or children with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). We, for the first time, describe the use of pelvic ultrasound (US) to achieve this. METHODS: A pelvic US was carried out on 82 children with a full or partially full bladder and with no history of bowel problems and on 95 children with CIC. The rectal crescent seen behind the bladder was measured. All children also had documentation of their age, weight, and height. RESULTS: The median age, weight, and height for the healthy children were comparable with those of the children with CIC. The median rectal crescent size in children with constipation was 3.4 cm (range, 2.10-7.0; IQR, 1.0), as compared with 2.4 cm (range, 1.3-4.2; IQR, 0.72) in the healthy children, and this difference is statistically significant on multiple regressions of log for rectal diameter, adjusted for height, weight, and age (P value< .001). CONCLUSION: Pelvic US is a quick child-friendly investigation, which can be used to document the presence of megarectum. It should be the first line investigation for all the children with CIC.


Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/complicações , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Reto/patologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Dilatação Patológica , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...