Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Nephrol ; 45(6): 532-539, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28531888

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) patients have high hospitalization rates. This nonrandomized trial tested the effect of a bundle of renal-specific "Right TraC™" strategies on 30-day all-cause readmission rates and, secondarily, 90-day readmissions and overall admissions among HD patients. METHODS: Twenty-six Fresenius clinics in West Virginia, Ohio, and Kentucky participated in the interventions. Eighteen matched clinics served as controls; intervention clinics also served as their own controls. We deployed the intervention in 3 incremental phases focused on patient information exchange, post-hospital follow-up, and telephonic case management. Thirty-day hospital readmissions per patient year (ppy) were calculated by dividing the total number of readmissions within 30 days of index admission by the total number of patient-years in baseline (2012) and remeasurement (2014) periods. We also compared readmission rates from 2010 to 2015. We used repeated measures Poisson regression to compare outcomes between groups and time periods. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2014, 30-day all-cause readmissions ppy declined for Right TraC clinics (from 0.88 to 0.66 [p < 0.001]; for controls, from 0.73 to 0.61 [p = 0.16]). Difference in change between groups was nonsignificant (p = 0.26). Overall admissions ppy declined: for Right TraC clinics from 2.51 to 1.97 (p < 0.001); for controls from 2.14 to1.92 (p = 0.21); difference in change between groups was significant (p = 0.01). For 2010, 2011, and 2012, Right TraC clinic 30-day readmissions ppy were unchanged: 0.89, 1.00, 0.88 (p = 0.61 and p = 0.49); they declined to 0.66 (p < 0.001) in 2014 (intervention year); rose to 0.70 (p = 0.06) in 2015 (interventions discontinued). CONCLUSION: We conclude that Right TraC interventions may have been helpful in reducing hospital readmission rates.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Transferência de Pacientes/métodos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Kentucky , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , West Virginia
2.
Nephrol Nurs J ; 41(3): 247-54; quiz 255, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25065058

RESUMO

The growing incidence of end stage renal disease (ESRD) has resulted in an ever-increasing demand for hemodialysis services throughout the country. Unlicensed assistive personnel (UAP), including dialysis technicians or patient care technicians (PCTs), and licensed practical nurses (LPNs) or licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) perform a vital role in the care of patients undergoing hemodialysis and are a critical staff component in hemodialysis facilities. This analysis provides a broad overview of the positions of states with respect to the administration of heparin and saline via peripheral and central lines by PCTs and LPNs/LVNs in the hemodialysis setting.


Assuntos
Descrição de Cargo/normas , Falência Renal Crônica/enfermagem , Licenciamento em Enfermagem , Enfermagem em Nefrologia/ética , Enfermagem em Nefrologia/organização & administração , Assistentes de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Diálise Renal/enfermagem , Administração Intravenosa , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Educação Continuada em Enfermagem , Heparina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Cloreto de Sódio/administração & dosagem , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...