Custom Endoprosthesis-Assisted Pediatric Microsurgical Jaw Reconstruction.

Surgical treatment of pediatric maxillary and mandibular tumors can cause significant postresection disfigurement, mastication, and speech dysfunction. The need to restore form and function without compromising growth at the recipient and donor sites poses a particular reconstructive dilemma. This study evaluates outcomes of the custom endoprosthesis (CE) compared with noncustom reconstruction (NCR) and introduces an algorithm using CE to optimize available soft tissue reconstructive options. An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review of all patients undergoing maxillary or mandibular reconstruction between 2016 and 2022 was completed. The independent variable of interest was CE utilization. Primary outcomes of interest included hardware failure/removal or exposure, major complications, and revision surgeries. Covariates of interest included patient demographics, medical comorbidities, tumor size, and pathologic diagnosis. Statistical analyses including independent t test, χ2 analyses, and univariate/multivariate logistic regression were performed using RStudio version 4.2.1. Fifty-one patients (37 mandible and 14 maxilla) underwent CE or NCR. Of patients, 37% (n = 19) received CE. Of patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction, there were significantly lower rates of hardware exposure (14.3% versus 47.8%, P = 0.018), failure (7.1% versus 43.5%, P = 0.048), major complications (28.6% versus 78.2%, P = 0.008), and revisions (11.1% versus 50.0%, P = 0.002) in the CE cohort compared with the NCR cohort. The rates of hardware failure, exposure, major complications, and revisions did not significantly differ in maxillary reconstructions, however, CE successfully reconstructed significantly larger defects (179.5 versus 74.6 cm3, P = 0.020) than NCRs. Deviating from NCR, the authors propose an algorithm considering anatomical location, extent of resection, and patient age for soft tissue selection. This algorithm yielded improved mandibular reconstructive outcomes and no increase in complications rate in maxillary reconstruction despite larger resection defects. Furthermore, the authors' initial findings demonstrate that CE is a safe option for pediatric maxillary and mandibular reconstruction that may, in addition, facilitate improved form and function.

Comparison of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Limb Salvage Reconstructive Surgery Based on Estimated Prevalence of Preexisting Peripheral Arterial Disease.

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage after lower extremity (LE) trauma requires optimal blood flow for successful microsurgical reconstruction. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) decreases LE perfusion, affecting wound healing. Patients who present with LE trauma may have undiagnosed PAD, particularly those with atherosclerotic risk factors. This study assesses outcomes after LE salvage in patients at risk for PAD. METHODS: This retrospective review evaluated patients who underwent LE reconstruction at a level 1 trauma center between 2007 and 2022. Patients with a nontraumatic mechanism of injury, missing postoperative records, and unspecified race were excluded. Demographics, flap characteristics, and postoperative complications were abstracted. The prevalence of LE PAD was calculated using a validated risk assessment tool. RESULTS: At our institution, 285 LE flaps performed on 254 patients were included in the study. Patients were categorized by prevalence of PAD, including 12 (4.7%) with high risk, 45 (17.7%) with intermediate risk, and 197 (77.6%) patients with low risk. The high-risk cohort had higher rates of partial flap necrosis ( P = 0.037), flap loss ( P = 0.006), and amputation ( P < 0.001) compared with the low-risk group. Fewer high-risk patients achieved full ambulation compared with the low-risk ( P = 0.005) cohort. Overall flap survival and limb salvage rates were 94.5% and 96.5%, respectively. Among the intermediate- and high-risk cohorts, only 50.9% of patients received a preoperative vascular assessment, and 3.8% received a vascular surgery consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral arterial disease represents a reconstructive challenge to microvascular surgeons. Patients with high-risk for PAD had higher rates of partial flap necrosis, flap loss, and amputation. In the setting of trauma, emphasis should be placed on preoperative vascular assessment for patients at risk of having undiagnosed PAD. Prospective studies collecting ankle-brachial index assessments and/or angiography will help validate this study's findings.

Impact of endocrine dysregulation on disability and non-motor symptoms in pediatric onset multiple sclerosis.

Background: Pediatric onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) commonly occurs at the time of various endocrine changes. Evaluation of the impact of endocrine status on disease severity in POMS has not been previously explored. Objective: This study sought to evaluate if sex and stress hormones in children with POMS impact motor and non-motor diseases severity. Methods: A single-center case control study was performed. Individuals with POMS were compared to individuals without neurologic disease. Each individual had three blood draws assessing stress and sex hormones between 07:00 and 09:00. Measures of fatigue (Epworth sleepiness scale), depression (PHQ-9), and quality of life (PedsQL) assessed at each visit. Results: Forty individuals with POMS and 40 controls were enrolled. Individuals with POMS had lower free testosterone (p = 0.003), cortisol (p < 0.001), and ACTH (p < 0.001) and had higher progesterone (p = 0.025) levels than controls. Relapses and EDSS were not impacted by endocrine variables. The POMS cohort had a significantly higher Epworth score (p < 0.001), PHQ-9 score (p < 0.001), and lower PQL score (p < 0.001) than controls. Non-motor measures were not associated with endocrine status. Conclusion: Free testosterone, cortisol, ACTH, and progesterone were abnormal in children with POMS although there was no association between endocrine status and markers of disease severity or non-motor symptoms of MS.

Outcomes of Local versus Free Flaps for Lower Extremity Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity reconstruction often requires soft tissue transfer for limb salvage. Flaps are allocated based on injury size, location, and shape coupled with surgeon expertise. Ideally, vascularized tissue should have similar outcomes across local and free tissue transfers. By evaluating outcomes from a Level 1 trauma center, we aim to provide recommendations regarding surgical management of leg reconstruction with respect to local versus free flap implementation. METHODS: This retrospective review evaluated patient medical history, demographics, flap characteristics, and outcomes from LAC + USC between 2007-2021 using an internal database. Outcomes included failure rates, complications, and ambulation. RESULTS: 357 lower extremity flaps were placed on 322 patients; 187 (52.4%) were local and 170 (47.6.%) were free flaps. Twenty-one (11.2%) local flaps suffered significantly more postoperative hardware infections and/or osteomyelitis compared to nine (5.3%) free flaps. Eleven (5.9%) local flaps developed partial necrosis, four requiring revision; 12 (6.4%) total local flaps required revision. Comparatively, sixteen (9.4%) free flaps developed partial necrosis, seven requiring revision; 18 (10.6%) total free flaps required revision. Flap survival was 96.3% for local versus 93.5% for free flaps. Percentage of fully ambulatory patients and time to final ambulation was not significant across cohorts. DISCUSSION: Local flaps may portent higher risk for infection; though the cause is not clear, the results may be confounded by comorbidities. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in flap survival or number of fully ambulatory patients across cohorts. Future studies should evaluate aesthetic results and patient satisfaction across flap types.

Obstetrical outcomes and follow-up for patients with asymptomatic COVID-19 at delivery: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Universal testing for COVID-19 on admission to the labor and delivery unit identifies asymptomatic patients. Whether or not these patients are at increased risk for adverse outcomes and go on to develop clinically significant disease is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 presentation among pregnant patients admitted for delivery and to determine whether these patients become symptomatic or require hospital readmission after discharge. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a multicenter, prospective cohort study of pregnant patients who delivered between 200/7 and 416/7 weeks' gestation and who were found to have COVID-19 based on universal screening on admission for delivery at 1 of 4 medical centers in New Jersey (exposed group). The unexposed group, comprising patients who tested negative for COVID-19, were identified at the primary study site. The primary outcomes were the rates of asymptomatic COVID-19 presentation, the development of symptoms among the asymptomatic positive patients, and hospital readmission rates in the 2 weeks following discharge. We compared the frequency of the distribution of risk factors and outcomes in relation to the COVID-19 status among patients with COVID-19 across all centers and among those without COVID-19 at the primary site. Associations between categorical risk factors and COVID-19 status were expressed as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Between April 10, 2020, and June 15, 2020, there were 218 patients with COVID-19 at the 4 sites and 413 patients without COVID-19 at the primary site. The majority (188 [83.2%]) of patients with COVID-19 were asymptomatic. Compared with the negative controls, these asymptomatic patients were not at increased risk for obstetrical complications that may increase the risk associated with COVID-19, including gestational diabetes (8.2% vs 11.4%; risk ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-2.01) and gestational hypertension (6.1% vs 7.0%; risk ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-2.67). Postpartum follow-ups via telephone surveys revealed that these patients remained asymptomatic and had low rates of family contacts acquiring the disease, but their adherence to social distancing guidelines waned during the 2-week postpartum period. Review of inpatient and emergency department records revealed low rates of hospital readmission. CONCLUSION: Most of the pregnant patients who screened positive for COVID-19 are asymptomatic and do not go on to develop clinically significant infection after delivery. Routine surveillance of these patients after hospital discharge appears to be sufficient.

Clinical course of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 in hospitalized pregnancies: a United States cohort study.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has had an impact on healthcare systems around the world with 3 million people contracting the disease and 208,000 cases resulting in death as of this writing. Information regarding coronavirus infection in pregnancy is still limited. Objective: This study aimed to describe the clinical course of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 in hospitalized pregnant women with positive laboratory testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Study Design: This is a cohort study of pregnant women with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 hospitalized at 12 US institutions between March 5, 2020, and April 20, 2020. Severe disease was defined according to published criteria as patient-reported dyspnea, respiratory rate >30 per minute, blood oxygen saturation ≤93% on room air, ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen <300 mm Hg, or lung infiltrates >50% within 24-48 hours on chest imaging. Critical disease was defined as respiratory failure, septic shock, or multiple organ dysfunction or failure. Women were excluded from the study if they had presumed coronavirus disease 2019, but laboratory testing was negative. The primary outcome was median duration from hospital admission to discharge. Secondary outcomes included need for supplemental oxygen, intubation, cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrest, death, and timing of delivery. The clinical courses are described by the median disease day on which these outcomes occurred after the onset of symptoms. Treatment and neonatal outcomes are also reported. Results: Of 64 hospitalized pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019, 44 (69%) had severe disease, and 20 (31%) had critical disease. The following preexisting comorbidities were observed: 25% had a pulmonary condition, 17% had cardiac disease, and the mean body mass index was 34 kg/m2. Gestational age was at a mean of 29±6 weeks at symptom onset and a mean of 30±6 weeks at hospital admission, with a median disease day 7 since first symptoms. Most women (81%) were treated with hydroxychloroquine; 7% of women with severe disease and 65% of women with critical disease received remdesivir. All women with critical disease received either prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation during their admission. The median duration of hospital stay was 6 days (6 days [severe group] and 10.5 days [critical group]; P=.01). Intubation was usually performed around day 9 on patients who required it, and peak respiratory support for women with severe disease was performed on day 8. In women with critical disease, prone positioning was required in 20% of cases, the rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome was 70%, and reintubation was necessary in 20%. There was 1 case of maternal cardiac arrest, but there were no cases of cardiomyopathy or maternal death. Thirty-two of 64 (50%) women with coronavirus disease 2019 in this cohort delivered during their hospitalization (34% [severe group] and 85% [critical group]). Furthermore, 15 of 17 (88%) pregnant women with critical coronavirus disease 2019 delivered preterm during their disease course, with 16 of 17 (94%) pregnant women giving birth through cesarean delivery; overall, 15 of 20 (75%) women with critical disease delivered preterm. There were no stillbirths or neonatal deaths or cases of vertical transmission. Conclusion: In pregnant women with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019, admission into the hospital typically occurred about 7 days after symptom onset, and the duration of hospitalization was 6 days (6 [severe group] vs 12 [critical group]). Women with critical disease had a high rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and there was 1 case of cardiac arrest, but there were no cases of cardiomyopathy or maternal mortality. Hospitalization of pregnant women with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 resulted in delivery during the clinical course of the disease in 50% of this cohort, usually in the third trimester. There were no perinatal deaths in this cohort.