Impact of asthma controller medications on clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively evaluate clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes associated with various therapeutic classes of asthma controller medications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational study, which used administrative claims data from US commercial health plans, included patients with asthma aged 18 through 64 years who filled a prescription for at least 1 asthma controller medication from September 1, 2003, through August 31, 2005. Outcome metrics included the use of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs), the use of oral corticosteroids, inpatient (INP)/emergency department (ED) visits, and asthma-related health care costs. A subset of 5000 patients was randomly selected for a survey using the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 56,168 eligible patients, 823 returned completed questionnaires. Compared with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), leukotriene modifiers (LMs) were associated with lower odds of INP/ED visits (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; P<.001), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.81; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($193; P<.001). In the subgroup analysis of adherent patients, LMs were associated with higher odds of INP/ED visits (OR, 1.74; P=.04), lower odds of using 6 or more SABA canisters (OR, 0.46; P<.001), and higher annual cost ($235; P<.001). Inhaled corticosteroids and LMs had a comparable impact on all patient-reported outcomes. For combination therapy, ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist consistently showed at least equivalent or better outcomes in the use of SABAs and oral corticosteroids, the risk of INP/ED visits, cost, asthma control level, quality of life, and impairment in productivity and activity. CONCLUSION: Inhaled corticosteroids were associated with a lower risk of INP/ED visits, and a lower cost if adherence was achieved. When adherence cannot be achieved, LMs may be a reasonable alternative. Combination therapy with ICS plus a long-acting beta-agonist was associated with better or equivalent clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes.

Complying with ACGME resident duty hours restrictions: restructuring the 80-hour workweek to enhance education and patient safety at Texas A&M/Scott & White Memorial Hospital.

Compliance with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident duty hours rules has created unique educational and patient-care challenges for the general medicine inpatient teaching (GMIT) teams at Texas A&M/Scott & White Memorial Hospital, including multiple patient hand-offs, multiple resident absences during teaching time, and loss of continuity of care for individual patients, all of which may have compromised patient safety. The Texas A&M/Scott & White Memorial Hospital internal medicine residency program initially complied with the duty hours rules by having residents take call every fourth night, followed by a six-hour post-call day. This system proved to be inefficient because it significantly disrupted patient care and resident education. Residents reported that this call system frequently caused them to approach the 80-hour limit and that they had difficulty leaving post-call because of unfulfilled responsibilities. They also reported sleep interruption and inadequate time to prepare for and attend educational conferences.After determining the peak admission times at the hospital, program leaders designed a call system during which the primary call team takes admissions from 12:00 pm to 8:00 pm each day, then leaves by 10:00 pm and returns after 10 hours for a full post-call day. After-hours admissions are managed by hospitalists. The solution did require hiring additional hospitalists for night-call coverage. The new structure has greatly improved the residents' experience on the GMIT teams. The entire team works together on call and post-call. Rounds and inpatient teaching continue normally on post-call days. Residents attend clinics and conferences post-call. Hand-offs are reduced greatly, and residents report that they are better rested. Residents also state that the new call system significantly enhances their education, patient care, and personal life.