Determinants of Meningococcal ACWY vaccination in adolescents in the US: completion and compliance with the CDC recommendations.

Since 2011, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) guidelines for routine MenACWY vaccination in the US include a primary dose before age 16 y, preferably at ages 11-12 y, with a booster dose at age 16 y. Data on rates and drivers of meningococcal vaccination completion (receipt of both doses) and compliance with recommendations (receipt of primary dose at ages 11-12 y followed by booster at 16 y) down to state-level are limited.This study evaluated rates and determinants of MenACWY vaccination completion and compliance in adolescents aged 17 y based on data from the annual National Immunization Survey-Teen between 2011 and 2016. Individual- and state-level determinants of completion and compliance were assessed using uni-level and multi-level multivariable regression models. Average national rates were 23.2% and 12.1% for completion and compliance, respectively, with large inter-state variation observed (completion: 8.7-39.7%; compliance: 3.1-26.2%). Beyond the state of residence, factors significantly associated with a higher likelihood of both completion and compliance included being male, up-to-date on other routine vaccines, having private or hospital-based vaccine providers (vs. public) and having >1 child in the household. Factors specifically associated with completion included having >1 annual health-care visit and presence of a booster-dose vaccine mandate, while a history of asthma and high-risk health conditions had a positive association with compliance. State-level determinants of completion and compliance included pediatricians-to-children ratio and the proportion of Immunization Information System use among adolescents, respectively. Outcomes of this study may help guide clinical, policy and educational interventions to further increase MenACWY completion rates and reduce disparities in vaccination.

Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Survey response rates among physicians are declining, and determining an appropriate level of compensation to motivate participation poses a major challenge. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of permitting intensive care physicians to select their preferred level of compensation for completing a short Web-based survey on physician (1) response rate, (2) survey completion rate, (3) time to response, and (4) time spent completing the survey. METHODS: A total of 1850 US intensivists from an existing database were randomized to receive a survey invitation email with or without an Amazon.com incentive available to the first 100 respondents. The incentive could be instantly redeemed for an amount chosen by the respondent, up to a maximum of US $50. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 35.90% (630/1755). Among the 35.4% (111/314) of eligible participants choosing the incentive, 80.2% (89/111) selected the maximum value. Among intensivists offered an incentive, the response was 6.0% higher (95% CI 1.5-10.5, P=.01), survey completion was marginally greater (807/859, 94.0% vs 892/991, 90.0%; P=.06), and the median number of days to survey response was shorter (0.8, interquartile range [IQR] 0.2-14.4 vs 6.6, IQR 0.3-22.3; P=.001), with no difference in time spent completing the survey. CONCLUSIONS: Permitting intensive care physicians to determine compensation level for completing a short Web-based survey modestly increased response rate and substantially decreased response time without decreasing the time spent on survey completion.