General practitioners and women with urinary incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is a common problem for adult women. It results in a large financial and psychosocial cost. Much urinary incontinence goes unreported. Women with urinary incontinence can be successfully assessed and treated in general practice but studies have shown that many GPs manage the condition inadequately. AIM: This study aims to examine GPs' awareness of urinary incontinence in women and their management of, and attitudes to, female urinary incontinence. METHOD: A qualitative study was conducted with 21 GPs responding to semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was carried out on these interviews, with recurrent views and experiences being identified and grouped. RESULTS: The interviews of 11 male and nine female GPs were suitable for analysis. GPs were aware of the prevalence and under-reporting of urinary incontinence in women. Many were unhappy with their own management of the condition and with the management options available to them. Male GPs in particular were reluctant to carry out gynaecological examinations, and few GPs expressed enthusiasm for teaching pelvic floor exercises or bladder drills. Medications were frequently used but generally considered ineffective or intolerable. The services of both public health nurses and practice nurses were under-used, largely because of lack of training in this area. Although incontinence nurses were employed in the area, many GPs did not know of their availability and, of those who did, few referred to them more than infrequently. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that many GPs avoid dealing with the problem of urinary incontinence in women and that they find it to be a difficult, chronic problem to treat. Specialist options seem not to be useful in general practice. The findings need to be explored in other GP settings.

Stress and morale in general practice: a comparison of two health care systems.

BACKGROUND: Poor morale and high levels of stress among general practitioners (GPs) are causing concern. Little research has previously been carried out to study possible differences in morale and stress between GPs working in two different but geographically similar health care systems. AIM: To compare perceived levels of stress and morale between GPs working in two different health care systems--one having a state monopoly (Northern Ireland) and the other having mixed private and state funding (Republic of Ireland)--and to look for factors that might help explain any differences in stress levels and morale between the two systems. METHOD: Anonymous and confidential questionnaires were sent to all 986 National Health Service (NHS) GPs in Northern Ireland (NI) and a random sample of 900 GPs in the Republic of Ireland (ROI). A common set of core questions on demographic details, partners and work patterns, perceived levels of stress and morale, safety, violence, and complaints were asked. RESULTS: Response rates were high in both areas: 91% in NI and 78% in the ROI. GPs in NI had significantly higher stress levels and significantly lower levels of morale than GPs in the ROI. The NI sample expect matters to get worse over the following year. Doctors in the ROI were more likely to be single handed and to work from two sites. Also, more GPs in ROI had fears for their safety and had been the subject of physical violence, but fewer had received complaints and medico-legal actions than in NI. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of both groups of doctors report feeling highly stressed but GPs in NI appear more unhappy and have a poorer outlook for the future. It is suggested that the structure, management, and expectations of the NHS have taken a severe toll on its GPs, whereas a system in which doctors have less practice support but more control is good for morale.

Women's experiences of general practitioner management of their vaginal symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the management of vaginal symptoms despite their frequency. Most vaginal symptoms in non-menopausal women are managed as thrush, although bacterial vaginosis is commoner. AIM: The aim of this study was to measure the experiences of women attending their general practitioner with vaginal symptoms including self-reporting of symptoms, duration and severity, informal support, over-the-counter remedies, sources of information, gender of doctor, expected and actual vaginal examination, and explanations and knowledge of common vaginal infections. METHOD: A postal questionnaire survey was conducted of 490 patients presenting with vaginal symptoms aged between 18 and 48 years who had attended 10 general practices within the previous 3 months in the East Midlands of England. RESULTS: A total of 85% of patients had suffered a previous episode, with 39% having had three or more infections in the previous year. Overall, 68% consult with each episode, and most consult within 7 days of onset of symptoms (median = 4 days). In all, 68% discussed their symptoms with partners, families or friends, but 32% relied solely on their doctor. Some 33% bought over-the-counter remedies. A total of 65% informed themselves further from encyclopaedias, leaflets and women's magazines, but there was a strong request for more information. Out of those questioned, 75% expected a vaginal examination, whereas 57% had such an examination performed. Most were told their symptoms were caused by thrush (78%), but patients' ideas on causation were varied. Most believed sexual transmission played a role in transmission of symptoms. Women were socially embarrassed by their symptoms, with 46% admitting to having the condition on their minds all or most of the time. Twenty-eight per cent of women wished to see a female doctor, with gender being unimportant to the remainder. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal symptoms were commonly recurrent, socially embarrassing and managed as candidiasis. Just over half the patients had a vaginal examination. There is a shortage of suitable information on vaginal infections available to patients, many of whom used over-the-counter medications.

Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test for bacterial vaginosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new rapid diagnostic test for bacterial vaginosis. DESIGN: Comparison of a new biochemical diamine test with low technology tests and microbiological culture. SETTING: General practice, family planning clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of the new diamine test with microbiological culture for Gardnerella vaginalis, with clue cells, and with the amine test. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine vaginal swabs were assayed quantitatively by the new diamine test. When compared with microbiological culture of Gardnerella vaginalis, the sensitivities and specificities were 86% and 81%, respectively. When compared with clue cell findings, the sensitivities and specificities were 97% and 83%, respectively. In the third comparison with the amine test the sensitivity was 94% and the specificity was 84%. Since microbiological diagnosis of organisms related to bacterial vaginosis is difficult, the new test and existing sideroom tests may be more sensitive to the condition and the true frequency of false positives may be less than the specificity in this study suggests. CONCLUSIONS: The new diamine test is accurate, sensitive and specific, and provides the basis for the rapid diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Such a test is needed if bacterial vaginosis is to be diagnosed and managed effectively in both general and specialist practice.

Patients' views of low back pain and its management in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a common and persistent problem. Research studies seeking to improve the quality of management of this condition have tended to ignore the opinions of patients. There is a growing acceptance of the importance of taking patients' views into account in developing management and educational programmes for a variety of conditions. AIM: This study set out to elicit the views of patients concerning low back pain and its management in general practice. METHOD: Fifty-two in-depth interviews were conducted with patients selected from a broad range of 12 general practices. RESULTS: Analysis of the interviews identified seven themes relating to: quality of life, prognosis, secondary prevention, help-seeking behaviour, explanation of underlying pathology, satisfaction with general practitioner management, and complementary therapy. Different patient viewpoints or perspectives were expressed within each of these themes. Patients adapted to the progress of their low back pain and were not seeking a 'magical cure' from either conventional or complementary therapies. CONCLUSION: Patients' views on low back pain are heterogeneous. The dissatisfaction expressed with medical explanations for the pain may be related to superficial clinical management and the constraints of general practice. Good management of low back pain needs to take patients' complex views of the condition into account.

Patient education for low back pain in general practice.

This comparative study of patient and general practitioner perceptions of patient education for low back pain (LBP) revealed significant differences in perspective. It suggests that although some general practitioners recognise the importance of patient education, they blame patients for its assumed failure as a management strategy. The patients in this study identified a range of reasons which explain their difficulties in following prevention advice which relate to not only limitations in themselves, but also to broader contextual factors over which they have little control. It is argued that both the inadequacy of current professional assumptions and the contextual factors that influence patients' prevention behaviours need to be acknowledged as a first step towards improving patient education for LBP in general practice.

General practitioner perceptions of low back pain patients.

General practitioners' perceptions of low back pain (LBP) patients were investigated through a series of in-depth semi-structured interviews, as part of a wider study which also investigated patient perceptions. An exhaustive analysis of the interview transcripts revealed six principal ways in which GPs distinguished between different patients as a means of deciding how to treat them. This differentiation, on the basis of patient characteristics, is the major focus for the resulting discussion and conclusions, and is used as a way of exploring more effective strategies for the future.

Dying of non-malignant diseases in general practice.

Recent policy changes within the British National Health Service have encouraged the provision of care within the community. The objective of this study was to explore the needs of informal caregivers of people with non-malignant diseases who wished to remain in their own homes until death. Semi-structured interviews with a non-random sample of 20 bereaved carers from 14 surgeries, their general practitioners, and district nurses were analyzed to discover the extent and quality of the care provided by the primary care team. One quarter of the doctors considered that palliative care applied exclusively to people with cancer. One half of the doctors felt that palliative care was primarily concerned with pain relief. Both doctors and nurses believed that their role was that of coordinating care for the patient. Carers were reluctant to criticize professional caregivers, but the results of this study suggest that carers need help with the burden of caring, including emotional support, advice and information regarding social services and financial benefits, and recognition of their caring role. Palliative care is not exclusive to people with cancer but should be extended to people with non-malignant diseases, encompassing not only symptom relief but also explicitly including emotional or spiritual support, care of the family, and support in preparing for the end of life.

Inventing a new diagnostic test for vaginal infection.

Bacterial vaginosis, which is underdiagnosed in clinical practice, has a characteristic fishy smell because of production of diamines. This smell is the basis of a visual rapid diagnostic test that is technically simple to perform. The test has been patented in Europe and America, and a licence agreement has been negotiated. This paper describes the process from idea to invention to patenting and licensing. The combined costs of research and patenting were met by a multinational company in return for rights to exploit the patent invention. The process has taken nine years and has needed clinical, scientific, legal, and commercial input to get the test to the marketplace.

Management of urinary incontinence in women.

Control of micturition is a complex physiological and anatomical process which often fails in women. The sequelae of urinary incontinence in women range from inconvenience to social and psychological stigmatization. Surprisingly, many women are tolerant of often quite severe sequelae, despite a range of management techniques that exist to alleviate or cure incontinence. Some of the more successful techniques are well suited to general practice management and can be carried out by the patient under the supervision of her doctor, district nurse, practice nurse or midwife. This paper reviews the physiology of micturition, stress urinary incontinence and incontinence caused by detrusor instability, and the management techniques available to alleviate or cure the problem.

The heartsink patient: a preliminary study.

Eight GPs identified 78 heartsink patients; in an open-ended interview they were asked to explain why they regarded them in this way. A GP's definition of a heartsink patient was influenced by GP sex, practice location, and time of surgery, although the number of participating GPs was too low to make any definite assertions. Practitioners' anticipations of heartsink consultations were generally over-exaggerated, with most of the encounters going better than expected. GPs expressed the view that these patients raised serious professional issues for them, whilst there was also a dislike for these patients' personalities and behaviour. Two levels of the heartsink state are hypothesized: one, a state of inertia, is when the heartsink patient has been a chronic high user of the primary health care system, and a GP has exhausted all avenues. The other is an acute situation with those heartsink patients who have been low users of the system in the past. Recent, new events in these patients' lives have raised an issue that is just as much to do with patient and doctor reaction to these events, as it is about finding a diagnosis or solution to the problem. We present the results and hypotheses to provoke further discussion and research.

A comparative double-blind randomised study of single dose fosfomycin trometamol with trimethoprim in the treatment of urinary tract infections in general practice.

A double-blind, double-dummy trial comparing a single dose treatment with fosfomycin trometamol (FT, 3 g) versus trimethoprim (TMP, 200 mg) was carried out in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. From 51 clinically evaluable patients, 44 were bacteriologically assessable at the 6-week follow-up. The results were as follows in the FT group (n = 22): eradication in 17 (77.3%); recurrence in 2 (9%); reinfection in 2 (9%), and persistence in 1 (4.5%). For the TMP group (n = 22) the results were: eradication in 12 (54.5%); recurrence in 1 (4.5%); reinfection in 1 (4.5%), and persistence in 8 (33.3%). There were no significant adverse events reported with either agent.

Survey of practice annual reports.

A questionnaire was sent to those practices known by the Royal College of General Practitioners to have produced annual reports. Practices were asked what data they included, to whom the report was circulated, what problems and benefits they encountered, and their opinion of the government's proposal to encourage such reports. The data most frequently included in reports related to practice workload, and the main benefit which respondents mentioned was facilitation of planning within the practice. Few practices used data derived from outside the practice and several commented on the difficulty of obtaining good quality data from the practice. Although annual reports are useful as internal documents, standardization of definitions and format, with support from family practitioner committees and health authorities is essential if more practices are to be encouraged to produce such documents and if the information obtained from them is to have a broader role in planning for primary health care.