Anesthesia and postpartum pain management for placenta accreta spectrum: The healthcare provider perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the management and experiences of healthcare providers around anesthetic care in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). METHODS: This descriptive survey study was carried out over a 6-week period between January and March 2023. Healthcare providers, both anesthesiologists and those involved in operative care for women with PAS, were invited to participate. Questions invited both quantitative and qualitative responses. Qualitative responses were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: In all, 171 healthcare providers responded to the survey, the majority of whom were working in tertiary PAS referral centers (153; 89%) and 116 (70%) had more than 10 years of clinical experience. There was variation in the preferred primary mode of anesthesia for PAS cases; 69 (42%) used neuraxial only, but 58 (35%) used a combined approach of neuraxial and general anesthesia, with only 12 (8%) preferring general anesthesia. Ninety-nine (61%) were offering a routine antenatal anesthesia consultation. Content analysis of qualitative data identified three main themes, which were "variation in approach to primary mode of anesthesia", "perspectives of patient preferences", and "importance of multidisciplinary team care". These findings led to the development of a decision aid provided as part of this paper, which may assist clinicians in counseling women on their options for care to come to an informed decision. CONCLUSIONS: Approach to anesthesia for PAS varied between healthcare providers. The final decision for anesthesia should take into consideration the clinical care needs as well as the preferences of the patient.

Anesthesia and postpartum pain management for placenta accreta spectrum: The patient perspective and recommendations for care.

OBJECTIVE: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a high-risk complication of pregnancy, which often requires complex surgical intervention. There is limited literature on the patient experience during the perioperative period and postpartum pain management for PAS. Therefore, this study aims to explore the patient perspective of anesthesia care. METHODS: Ethical approval was granted by the hospital ethics committee (EC02.2023). This was a descriptive survey study, including women with a history of pregnancy complicated by PAS who were members of two patient advocacy groups. The survey, consisting of both open and closed questions, was performed over a 6-week period between January and March 2023. Content analysis was performed on qualitative data to identify themes, and recommendations for care are suggested. RESULTS: A total of 347 participants responded to the survey; 76% (n = 252) had a cesarean hysterectomy (n = 252), and general anesthesia was the most common primary mode of anesthesia (39%, n = 130). We identified two overarching themes: experiences of anesthesia and experience of postpartum pain management. Under experiences of anesthesia, three subthemes were identified, namely "communication with the anesthesiologist", "deferring to the expertise of the team", and "consequences of decision around the mode of anesthesia." Under postpartum pain management, two subthemes emerged: "support of specialist PAS team" and "poor pain management following PAS surgery". CONCLUSIONS: Women want to be involved in decisions around their care, but do not always understand the consequences of their decision-making, such as missing the birth of their child. An antenatal anesthesiology consultation is important to provide women with information, explore preferences, and develop a plan of care for the birth.

Intraoperative cell salvage as part of a blood conservation strategy in an obstetric population with abnormal placentation at a large Irish tertiary referral centre: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhagic morbidity is more common in women with abnormal placentation, that is placenta praevia or morbidly adherent placenta. The incidence of abnormal placentation is increasing due to rising caesarean section rates. Concerns regarding blood safety, blood shortages and soaring costs of blood processing have generated growing enthusiasm for blood conservation strategies. The aim of our study was to look at intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) use and allogeneic transfusion patterns in patients with abnormal placentation. METHODS: Patients with abnormal placentation were identified from the hospital database over a 2-year period between 2015 and 2016. Information collected for those that had IOCS setup included estimated blood loss, volume of blood collected and returned, pre- and postoperative haemoglobin levels and use of allogeneic blood. RESULTS: A total of 139 cases of abnormal placentation were identified. Abnormal placentation accounted for 62% of all cases of IOCS usage and was established for 53 patients with abnormal placentation. The re-transfusion rate was 18.5%. Five patients received IOCS blood only. The allogeneic transfusion rate was 7.5% in patients who had IOCS setup compared with 6.9% in those who did not (p = 1.00). Median blood loss was greater for patients who had IOCS blood returned compared with patients who had not (p = 0.004). The median volume of blood returned was 520 (114-608) mL. Preoperative haemoglobin levels were lower for patients who received a combination of cell salvage and allogeneic blood (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: IOCS contributed to a reduction or elimination of allogeneic transfusion for a proportion of this high-risk cohort and should be an integral component of a hospitals' blood conservation strategy.