An audit and international comparison of asthma management in the emergency department.

AIMS: 1. To perform an audit of asthma management in the Christchurch Hospital emergency department during the period March 1987 to August 1988. 2. To compare management of asthma in Christchurch with other centres in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. 3. To compare markers of asthma severity on admission with other centres. METHODS: Details of all attendances by adults to the Christchurch Hospital emergency department with acute asthma during the above period were recorded on specially designed asthma treatment sheets. This data was compared with similar studies performed in Wellington (NZ) and Southampton and Leicester (UK). RESULTS: 759 cases were analysed. Most subjects were in the 15-25 year age group. 47% were taking inhaled corticosteroids at presentation. History taking was satisfactory according to guidelines operative at that time. Peak flow rate measurement at presentation was performed in 79% of cases, and in 67% of cases following treatment. Nebulised bronchodilators were given in 88% of cases and parenteral steroids given in 22%. 46% of cases were discharged home and of these 28% received a course of oral prednisone. All management decisions, except the decision to give oral steroids on discharge, showed a relationship to objective indices of asthma severity. CONCLUSION: Comparison with other centres shows that the treatment of acute asthma in Christchurch was of a similar standard. Severity of asthma on presentation, as measured by peak flow and pulse rates showed no difference between Christchurch and Southampton.

The use of a simulated patient to assess clinical practice in the management of a high risk asthmatic.

Actors were trained to simulate a young asthmatic woman in the high risk category. Sixty-four of the 195 general practitioners and family medicine registrars in Christchurch city agreed to take part in the study in which they would be consulted by a simulated patient remaining blind to identification of the patient, the time and the medical problem. The simulators were trained to record information from the consultation and rate doctor behaviour when presenting, as a new patient on transfer, for a repeat prescription of asthma medication. Forty-nine doctors had one consultation and of these 25 had a second. Consultation time averaged 15.6 minutes and waiting time 17.4 minutes. Practice nurses and physiotherapists were rarely utilised. There were no specialist referrals. Serum theophylline levels were estimated in 4%. The chest was examined in 39% of consultations, the peak flow in 59%, both in 30% and neither in 32%. Drug prophylaxis was encouraged in 62%, home peak flow meter monitoring was encouraged in 49%, smoking was discouraged in 41%, aerosol technique was checked in 1%, a crisis plan was provided in 57% and asthma education in 42%. Doctor behaviour and communication skills were rated highly except that clear instruction on follow up appointments was given in only 24%. The second consultation appeared to be a briefer rerun of the first, indicating episodic care rather than planned long term management. A number of issues were identified for further study and education.

The use of simulated patients in the assessment of actual clinical performance in general practice.

This pilot study assessed a novel approach to the evaluation of clinical performance in the practice setting, using actors trained to simulate real patients. Thirteen general practitioner teachers, 10 family medicine training programme registrars, and 10 recent graduates of the FMTP were recruited. They agreed to be consulted by an unknown simulated patient. Two young patients with classical migraine were selected. Two young actors, a male and a female, were trained to simulate their symptomatology and history. A scoring system was devised to broadly assess a single general practice first consultation, and the simulators were trained to score. Eighty-five percent of respondents were willing to take part in a further study. Seventy-three percent had no suspicion at all that the patient was simulated. The average consultation time was 17 minutes (range 4-40). The average score was 67% (range 10-100%). The diagnosis was made in every case and a wide variety of treatments were prescribed. This appears to be a practical and acceptable method of assessing clinical performance.

A counselling skills workshop for family medicine trainees.

Experience with a workshop designed to teach practical consulting, communication and counselling skills to family medicine vocational trainees is described. Responses to self-report questionnaires immediately (71 percent response rate), and one to two years after the workshop (62 percent rate), are reported. A high percentage of respondents agreed that the workshop had been effective in imparting basic counselling and communication skills, and had influenced them to change their consulting style. These changes commonly persisted at one to two year follow up.

A case of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome associated with hyperplasia of salivary and Brunner's glands.

A case is reported showing enlargement of the salivary gland with hypersecretion and Brunner's gland hyperplasia in the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Gastric hypersecretion and diarrhoea were prominent, but there was no peptic ulceration.