'Thinking that somebody's going to delay [a tonsillectomy] for one to two years is quite horrifying really': a qualitative feasibility study for the NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA Part 2).

OBJECTIVES: Level one evidence on the value of adult tonsillectomy versus non-surgical management remains scarce. Before embarking on a costly national randomised controlled trial, it is essential to establish its feasibility. DESIGN: Feasibility study with in-depth qualitative and cognitive interviews. SETTING: ENT staff and patients were recruited from nine hospital centres across England and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were referred for tonsillectomy (n = 15), a convenience sample of general practitioners (n = 11) and ear, nose and throat staff (n = 22). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: To ascertain whether ear, nose and throat staff would be willing to randomise patients to the treatment arms. To assess general practitioners' willingness to refer patients to the NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA) centres. To assess patients' willingness to be randomised and the acceptability of the deferred surgery treatment arm. To ascertain whether the study could progress to the pilot trial stage. RESULTS: Ear, nose and throat staff and general practitioners were willing to randomise patients to the proposed NATTINA. Not all ENT staff were in equipoise concerning the treatment pathways. Patients were reluctant to be randomised into the deferred surgery group if they had already waited a substantial time before being referred. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the NATTINA may not be feasible. Proposed methods could not be realistically assessed without a pilot trial. Due to the importance of the question, as evidenced by NATTINA clinicians, and strong support from ENT staff, the pilot trial proceeded, with modifications.

Magnetic resonance imaging of branchial cleft abnormalities: illustrated cases and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: We report two cases of branchial cleft abnormalities investigated using magnetic resonance imaging. BACKGROUND: There appears to be no clear imaging technique that is universally recommended for imaging branchial cleft abnormalities. Options include fistulography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. METHOD: Case reports and literature review. CASE REPORTS: Two cases, although not unusual in themselves, are described to illustrate the use of magnetic resonance imaging to define the anatomy and to assist surgical planning. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging is able to accurately depict the extent and course of branchial cleft abnormalities, and in the current cases could have been relied upon to determine the necessary surgical procedure. Branchial cleft abnormalities are sufficiently rare for magnetic resonance imaging to be recommended as the first-line imaging modality.

Treatment of prehospital refractory ventricular fibrillation with bretylium tosylate.

Among 218 patients treated for prehospital arrest during an eight-month baseline period prior to addition of bretylium tosylate to the paramedic protocol in Columbus, 16 (7.3%) were seen with refractory ventricular fibrillation (RVF). These patients failed to respond to multiple countershocks, lidocaine, bicarbonate and epinephrine, and either were transported in arrest during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)(14) or were pronounced dead at the scene (2). A single patient was eventually resuscitated in and discharged from the hospital. During the subsequent 16 1/2-month experience with bretylium used only for prehospital RVF, 421 patients with prehospital arrest were seen, 35 of whom (8.3%) had RVF. All but five patients were defibrillated successfully, and 14 (40%) were converted to a rhythm sufficient to obviate CPR during transportation. Eleven patients (31%) survived to be admitted to the hospital, and eight of 35 (23% vs 1/16 or 6.2% above, P less than .05) were discharged and remained well three to 17 months later. Bretylium tosylate may provide life-saving therapy for refractory prehospital ventricular fibrillation so that survival from an almost uniformly fatal condition is improved. While patients with persistent arrest generally should be transported to the hospital, such patients should not be subjected to the difficulties of CPR in transit unless they are first given bretylium if RVF is present.