Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Australas Emerg Care ; 23(4): 259-264, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32518037

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: On 21 November 2016, during a thunderstorm asthma event, an external disaster was called in our Emergency Department (ED), the first since comprehensive implementation of electronic clinical documentation. This study compared medication ordering and administration documentation during surge (thunderstorm asthma) and non-surge (control) conditions. METHODS: Retrospective audit of ED patients presenting with asthma between 21 and 23 November 2016 (72-h thunderstorm asthma period) and equivalent 72-h periods of the preceding three weeks (control period). Demographic details, medical history and treatment were extracted from Cerner Millennium. RESULTS: During the thunderstorm asthma and control periods, 318 and 164 patients presented with respiratory symptoms; 302 (95.0%) and 27 (16.5%) were due to asthma, respectively. Salbutamol was ordered and administration signed on the Medication Administration Record for 122/302 (40.4%) thunderstorm asthma and 21/27 (77.8%) control patients (p<0.01). During the thunderstorm asthma period, 52/302 (17.2%) patients had no documentation on the Medication Administration Record or any ED notes of receiving salbutamol, whilst during the control periods 2/27 (7.4%) patients had no such documentation. Similar disparities with corticosteroids and ipratropium were identified. CONCLUSION: Quality of medication documentation declined during surge conditions. These data have informed policies for future surge events, when higher risk medications might be required.


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Documentação/métodos , Prescrição Eletrônica/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Albuterol/uso terapêutico , Asma/complicações , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Criança , Documentação/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Eletrônica/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vitória
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; : e13427, 2019 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31573741

RESUMO

Background Appropriate antibiotic prescribing improves patient outcomes and mitigates antimicrobial resistance. As the majority of antibiotics are used in the community, rational prescribing in this setting is of paramount importance. Objectives We aimed to (1) evaluate the concordance of community antibiotic prescribing with guidelines for three common infection types among patients who presented to hospital, and (2) identify relationships between guideline concordance and patient-related factors. Methods Medical records were evaluated from the Royal Hobart Hospital (Tasmania, Australia) for patients presenting with respiratory tract, urinary tract or skin and soft tissue infections within a 12-month period. Prior-to-hospital antibiotic therapy was assessed for concordance with prescribing guidelines based on presenting diagnosis. Concordance was assessed against first-line recommendations in the Australian Therapeutic Guidelines - Antibiotic, based on drug choice, dose, frequency and patient factors. Descriptive statistics were performed to address Objective 1. Multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to address Objective 2 with the following independent variables: infection type, age, allergies, diabetes status, gender and residential setting. Results A total of 285 patient records were eligible for data analysis; 28.8% (n = 82) were fully guideline concordant. The most common reason for non-concordance was inappropriate drug choice (n = 143, 50.2%). Patients with the following characteristics were less likely to receive concordant therapy: diabetes (OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8, P = .02) and increasing age (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00, P = .04). Conclusions Almost three-quarters of patients received community-initiated antibiotic therapy that was not fully guideline concordant. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are urgently needed to improve guideline concordance for community-initiated antibiotic therapy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...