A naturalistic trial of brief psychodynamic therapy for recurrent major depression.

We examined disposition, course, and outcome for 100 outpatients offered short-term individual dynamic therapy as a primary treatment for recurrent major depression. Evaluations using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) were conducted regularly during the year after referral. Patients failing to show a response (50% decrease in pre-treatment HAM-D scores) were referred for consultation regarding "augmentation" of therapy with antidepressant medication. Nineteen referrals failed to meet inclusion-exclusion criteria, reflecting therapist overestimation of the severity of patients' depressive symptoms; referring therapists also missed other salient clinical issues. Fourteen patients completed assessments but did not start therapy; "decliners" were more likely to report previous admissions and thus may have opted for hospitalization. Sixty-seven patients started therapy; 18 dropped out (26.9%). Of the 49 therapy completers, 23 (46.9%) did not receive augmented treatment; 20 (40.8%) demonstrated evidence of recovery during the year while 3 (6.1%) did not. Of the 26 patients (53.1%) prescribed antidepressants, 16 (32.7%) demonstrated evidence of recovery and 10 (20.4%) did not. Patient clusters also showed distinct trajectories of change on the HAM-D over the year after referral. Patients who received augmented treatment but showed no evidence of recovery scored significantly higher on indices of alexithymia. Clinical implications of the findings are considered.

The psychodynamic psychiatry service of the University of Alberta Hospital: a thirty year history.

This paper describes the Psychodynamic Psychiatry Service (PPS) of the University of Alberta Hospital over its 30 years of development. This psychiatric organization consists of three clinical programs-an outpatient clinic and intensive day and evening programs-and an integral evaluation and research unit. The PPS is unique in its group therapy clinical orientation, its psychodynamic theoretical orientation, and its integration of an ongoing research program that establishes empirical validation of its clinical work. The productivity and longevity of this psychiatric organization appear to derive from several strengths, including cooperation between leaders of the clinical and research programs; the institution of staff relations groups in the three clinical programs; the operation of the fully integrated evaluation and research program that serves to provide empirical support for the treatments offered; and a unifying ideology characterized by the valuing of both psychodynamic and group oriented work. Other important factors to the success of the PPS include the strengths of the founder of the service and financial and other support of the academic department in which it is housed. This paper describes the historical development and present structure and functioning of the PPS, the challenges it has been confronted with, and the responses to those challenges. We conclude with factors contributing to its survival and productivity and with thoughts about the future.