The diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test: A prospective observational study.

AIMS: Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is controversial. This prospectivestudy compared different sets of diagnostic cut-off points for plasma glucose measurements following a 75 g Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT). METHODS: Women who had maternal risk factors for GDM were recruited at their convenience attheir first prenatal visit and consented to a one-step OGTT at 26-28 weeks gestation.All women fulfilling the World Health Organization (WHO) 2013 diagnostic criteriareceived standard care for GDM. RESULTS: Of the 202 women, 139 (69%) had one risk factor for GDM and 63 (31%) had > 1.Using the WHO criteria, 53% (n = 108) had GDM compared with 35% (n = 71) usingCanadian criteria and 18% (n=36) using National Institute for Health Care Excellencecriteria (NICE) criteria (both p<0.001). Of the 108 women, 50% (n = 54) requiredpharmacological treatment to control hyperglycaemia. If the Canadian criteria wereapplied, 11/54 (20.4%) women would not have received hypoglycaemics. If the NICEcriteria were applied, 36/54 (66.7%) women would not have received hypoglycaemics.Maternal insulin, HOMA-IR and C-peptide measured at the time of the OGTT showed evidence of increased insulin resistance in women who had GDM based on the WHOcriteria but who had a normal OGTT based on the Canadian or NICE criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Under stringent research conditions, our study suggeststhat the Canadian and, in particular, the NICE criteria are not identifying women who may benefit fromimproved glycaemic control. These findings support the need for the planned review of the NICE guidelines on GDM in 2020.

Is point of care testing in Irish hospitals ready for the laboratory modernisation process? An audit against the current national Irish guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The Laboratory modernisation process in Ireland will include point of care testing (POCT) as one of its central tenets. However, a previous baseline survey showed that POCT was under-resourced particularly with respect to information technology (IT) and staffing. AIMS: An audit was undertaken to see if POCT services had improved since the publication of National Guidelines and if such services were ready for the major changes in laboratory medicine as envisaged by the Health Service Executive. METHODS: The 15 recommendations of the 2007 Guidelines were used as a template for a questionnaire, which was distributed by the Irish External Quality Assessment Scheme. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of a possible 45 acute hospitals replied. Only a quarter of respondent hospitals had POCT committees, however, allocation of staff to POCT had doubled since the first baseline survey. Poor IT infrastructure, the use of unapproved devices, and low levels of adverse incident reporting were still major issues. CONCLUSIONS: Point of care testing remains under-resourced, despite the roll out of such devices throughout the health service including primary care. The present high standards of laboratory medicine may not be maintained if the quality and cost-effectiveness of POCT is not controlled. Adherence to national Guidelines and adequate resourcing is essential to ensure patient safety.

A survey of point of care testing in Irish hospitals: room for improvement.

BACKGROUND: "Guidelines for safe and effective management and use of point of care testing" have been recently launched in Ireland. AIMS: To survey point of care testing (POCT) services in the Republic of Ireland. METHODS: A questionnaire covering accreditation status, existence of POCT committees, quality management systems, and staff resources was distributed by the Irish External Quality Assessment Scheme (IEQAS). RESULTS: Of those that returned completed questionnaires, 56% had assigned specific POCT responsibilities to designated staff. Most support was for blood gases and glucose analysis. Compared with other published studies, Irish laboratories gave similar support for blood gases, less for glucose and much less for urinalysis. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrated poor IT support for POCT. The majority of the respondents (78%) were dissatisfied with the quality of the POCT service in their institution.

Efficacy of nosiheptide as a growth promotant for growing-finishing swine--a cooperative study.

A cooperative study involving 296 pigs was conducted at two experiment stations and at a commercial research farm to evaluate the efficacy of nosiheptide as a growth promotant for growing-finishing swine. At each station, five or six replicate pens of four or five pigs/pen were fed a fortified, corn-soybean meal basal diet with 0, 5.5, 11 or 22 ppm nosiheptide. Initial and final weights averaged 11 and 92 kg, respectively. Daily gain increased quadratically (623, 664, 669, 678 g/d; P less than .03) and feed/gain decreased quadratically (3.35, 3.24, 3.24, 3.28; P less than .02) with increasing level of nosiheptide. Breakpoint analysis indicated that gain plateaued at 6.8 ppm and feed/gain at 5.5 ppm of nosiheptide. Averaged across all levels of nosiheptide, gain and feed/gain during the growing phase (11 to 52 kg body weight) were improved by 13.1 and 7.6%, respectively, by feeding the antibiotic. For the entire growing-finishing period, gain was improved by 5.3% and feed/gain by 2.9% in pigs fed nosiheptide. Although there were large differences in gain and feed/gain, the responses to dietary treatments were similar among the three stations. The results indicate that nosiheptide is an effective growth-promoting agent for growing-finishing swine.

Routine heparin therapy inhibits adrenal aldosterone production.

While heparin-induced aldosterone deficiency has been sporadically reported, it is not known whether heparin always inhibits aldosterone production to a variable extent or if this is an idiosyncratic effect, nor is the mechanism underlying the phenomenon known. We have examined plasma aldosterone, PRA, and aldosterone to renin activity ratios in 20 patients before, during and after treatment with heparin. Aldosterone cell during heparin treatment from 73.5 +/- 20.5 to 36.8 +/- 11.2 pg/ml (P less than 0.05) and rose after its withdrawal to 94.8 +/- 37.1 p/ml (P less than 0.05). PRA rose with heparin treatment from 2.8 +/- 1.0 to 6.1 +/- 1.6 ng/ml . h (P less than 0.05) and fell to 2.4 +/- 0.5 ng/ml . h (P less than 0.05) when the drug was withdrawn. Aldosterone to renin activity ratios, which are indices of aldosterone responsiveness to angiotensin, fell from 59.5 +/- 1.7 to 25 +/- 14.9 (P less than 0.01) with heparin treatment and rose after withdrawal of the drug to 58.5 +/- 24.9 (P less than 0.01). There was a significant small fall in serum sodium levels with the introduction of heparin, but none of the patients developed clinical mineralocorticoid deficiency. Although heparin consistently perturbs aldosterone production in the glomerulosa cell, this effect is not clinically significant when normal adjustments can be made in the generation of angiotensin. However, where limitations in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis exist, e.g. in diabetes mellitus, mineralocorticoid insufficiency may be precipitated by heparin.