End-tidal carbon dioxide measurements as a prognostic indicator of outcome in cardiac arrest.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of end-tidal carbon dioxide values in predicting survival in cardiopulmonary arrest. BACKGROUND: The decision about when to terminate resuscitative efforts for patients with cardiopulmonary arrest is often subjective. End-tidal carbon dioxide values have been suggested as potential objective criteriafor making this decision. METHODS: This study was a cooperative effort of the St Louis chapter of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses and its members and involved 6 hospitals and an air evacuation service. All adult patients who had a cardiopulmonary arrest were eligiblefor the study. Once a patient with cardiac arrest was intubated, end-tidal carbon dioxide and cardiac rhythms were measured and recorded every 5 minutes for 20 minutes or until resuscitation efforts were terminated. Patients' survival at the time of the arrest, survival 24 hours after the arrest, and discharge status were followed up. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients were enrolled in the study. All but 1 patient with end-tidal carbon dioxide values less than 10 mm Hg died before discharge. End-tidal carbon dioxide values greater than 10 mm Hg were associated with various degrees of survival. Overall survival to discharge was less than 14%, regardless of the end-tidal carbon dioxide value. CONCLUSION: Measurements of end-tidal carbon dioxide can be used to accurately predict nonsurvival of patients with cardiopulmonary arrest. End-tidal carbon dioxide levels should be monitored during cardiopulmonary arrest and should be considered a useful prognostic value for determining the outcome of resuscitative efforts.

A phase I study of sequential vinorelbine followed by paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: In vitro experiments suggest that administration of vinorelbine preceding paclitaxel results in synergistic cytotoxic effects. A phase I dose escalation trial of vinorelbine daily x 3 with paclitaxel on day 3 repeated every 28 days in metastatic breast cancer patients was completed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Female patients, PS 0-2, without evidence of CNS disease or prior neuropathies were treated with vinorelbine at dose levels 7, 10, 13 mg/m2 per day and paclitaxel over three hours at dose levels of 135, 175, and 200 mg/m2. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with six dose levels were studied. At dose level 1, patients developed intolerable but reversible neutropenia. Subsequent dose levels required filgrastim. Dose limiting toxicities were myalgia and fatigue at vinorelbine 13 mg/m2/day and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2. Neuropathy was minor. Twelve of twenty-five patients with measurable disease had a rapid response which did not correlate with dose level. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential administration of these two agents demonstrates activity in breast cancer patients. Phase II dosing on this schedule should be vinorelbine 13 mg/m2/day x 3 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2. With proper selection of patients, concern about neurologic toxicity should not impede future trials of vinorelbine with paclitaxel.

Ventricular pacing threshold and time to capture postdefibrillation in patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

To assess the effect of defibrillation and amiodarone on ventricular pacing threshold and time to capture in patients undergoing automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) implantation, 28 patients were prospectively evaluated. The patients were entered into one of two protocols: Ia--epicardial ventricular pacing threshold measured at baseline (preventricular fibrillation induction) and 10 and 60 seconds postdefibrillation with 20 J, or Ib--two fibrillation-defibrillation sequences were performed 3 minutes apart and ventricular pacing thresholds were measured for each sequence at baseline and at 10 and 60 seconds postdefibrillation with 20 J. Ten patients also underwent asynchronous pacing at 1.1 times baseline threshold during ventricular fibrillation with measurement of time to capture postdefibrillation. All patients were randomly assigned to receive either amiodarone or no antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Ventricular fibrillation was induced with AC (applied for 1-2 seconds), and standard epicardial bipolar and epicardial patch electrodes of the AICD were used for pacing and defibrillation, respectively. Ventricular pacing threshold at baseline, 10 seconds, 60 seconds, and 3 minutes postdefibrillation did not differ significantly. There were no significant differences in patients with or without amiodarone therapy. Furthermore, there was no transient loss of ventricular capture postdefibrillation or significant difference in time to capture with amiodarone (less than or equal to 2 seconds). We conclude that following internal defibrillation with 20 J: (1) ventricular pacing threshold at 10 seconds, 60 seconds, and 3 minutes were not significantly different from baseline with one or two fibrillation-defibrillation sequences, (2) time to capture was short, and (3) there was no significant difference in no drug versus amiodarone. These findings have direct clinical importance in considering device therapy with both pacing and defibrillating capabilities.

Transdermal versus subcutaneous leuprolide: a comparison of acute pharmacodynamic effect.

Transdermal administration of peptides has been limited by the barrier properties of the skin. We compared the acute luteinizing hormone (LH) response to subcutaneous and transdermal administration of an LH-releasing hormone agonist (leuprolide). Eighteen volunteers received 5 mg leuprolide added to electrically powered patches delivering a current of 0.22 microA (transdermally). One week later, they received a 5 mg subcutaneous dose. LH response was measured. The area under the curve for LH response, maximum LH response, and time to maximum LH response were similar. Time to first response was shorter (147 +/- 108 minutes [transdermally] and 73 +/- 74 minutes [subcutaneously]; p less than 0.05), and the area under the curve for the first 150 minutes was greater (3655 +/- 2246 mIU.min/ml [transdermally] and 8666 +/- 4067 mIU.min/ml [subcutaneously]; p less than 0.05) for subcutaneous delivery. No major adverse effects were seen. This electrically powered transdermal technique merits further study.

Successful transdermal administration of therapeutic doses of a polypeptide to normal human volunteers.

The human stratum corneum constitutes a relatively impermeable barrier to the transdermal absorption of most substances, including polypeptides and proteins. This double-blind, randomized, crossover study in 13 normal men evaluated whether a low level of electrical current could induce changes in cutaneous permeability sufficient to produce absorption of a polypeptide. We compared cutaneous absorption of 5 mg of leuprolide (a 9 amino acid luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue) in transdermal patches containing 0.2 mA electrical current (active) and in patches containing no electrical current (passive). Serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentration was measured 12 times during an 8-hour period as a measure of drug effect. Similar baseline LH levels were seen in each group: active = 11.3 +/- 3.1 mIU/ml and passive = 13.7 +/- 4.7 mIU/ml (p not significant). Significant elevations of LH were seen in active compared with passive patches (p = 0.0084). As predicted, passive patches produced no elevation of LH concentration (LH = 11.8 +/- 7.1 mIU/ml at 4 hours). However, active patches produced elevations comparable to those achieved with subcutaneous administration of the drug (LH = 56.4 +/- 49.6 mIU/ml at 4 hours and p = 0.003 compared with passive). The patches were well tolerated without significant cutaneous toxicity. It is concluded that the use of low levels of electrical current can induce changes in the permeability of the stratum corneum. These changes are sufficient to promote the transdermal absorption of therapeutically relevant amounts of a polypeptide. This has major importance for our understanding of skin permeability and for the development of new techniques for drug administration.

A controlled clinical trial of the addition of transdermal scopolamine to a standard metoclopramide and dexamethasone antiemetic regimen.

A randomized prospective clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the potential utility of adding transdermal scopolamine to a standard regimen of metoclopramide and dexamethasone for the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. Thirty-one patients who were about to receive their first cycle of chemotherapy, using a combination regimen including cisplatin at a dose greater than or equal to 60 mg/m2 were randomized to receive an antiemetic regimen of either metoclopramide and dexamethasone alone, or these two drugs plus transdermal scopolamine patches. The mean number of episodes of emesis was .63 +/- 1.31 in the 16 scopolamine-treated patients, and 2.27 +/- 2.66 in the 15 patients who did not receive scopolamine (P less than .01). The scopolamine appeared to inhibit extrapyramidal reactions to the metoclopramide, but the number of cases was too small for statistical significance. We conclude that the addition of transdermal scopolamine to a standard metoclopramide and dexamethasone antiemetic regimen provides additive benefit in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis.

Metoclopramide decreases renal plasma flow.

Intravenous dopamine has been shown to increase renal plasma flow in man. The role of endogenous dopamine in the maintenance of renal plasma flow has not been described. We speculated that if endogenous dopamine activity is important in the maintenance of renal plasma flow, then high doses of a potent dopamine blocking drug such as metoclopramide would decrease renal flow. To test this hypothesis, we measured renal plasma flow using a single-injection technique with 131I-labeled orthoiodohippurate. Measurements were made before and after the administration of high doses of metoclopramide (1 to 2.5 mg/kg) to 20 patients receiving metoclopramide as an antiemetic before chemotherapy. Seven control subjects underwent sequential measurements of renal plasma flow without intervening metoclopramide dosing. Mean (+/- SD) renal plasma flow did not change in the control population (from 441 +/- 198 to 437 +/- 117 ml/min), but declined significantly in the patients who received metoclopramide (443 +/- 115 ml/min before metoclopramide and 387 +/- 137 ml/min after metoclopramide; P less than 0.001). In 25% of our study population the decline in renal plasma flow was greater than 20% below baseline levels. The magnitude of the effect did not appear to correlate with the pretreatment creatinine clearance, age, or sex of the patients. We conclude that high doses of metoclopramide decrease renal plasma flow in man. These data suggest a role for dopamine in the maintenance of renal plasma flow in patients receiving intravenous hydration. Changes of the magnitude we observed may well be of clinical importance. These findings therefore also suggest the possibility of metoclopramide potentiation of cisplatin nephrotoxicity.