Meta-analysis of the effect of extending the interval after long-course chemoradiotherapy before surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The current standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Surgery is conventionally performed approximately 6-8 weeks after nCRT. This study aimed to determine the effect on outcomes of extending this interval. METHODS: A systematic search was performed for studies reporting oncological results that compared the classical interval (less than 8 weeks) from the end of nCRT to TME with a minimum 8-week interval in patients with LARC. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival, local recurrence and distant metastasis rates, R0 resection rates, completeness of TME, margin positivity, sphincter preservation, stoma formation, anastomotic leak and other complications. A meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Twenty-six publications, including four RCTs, with 25 445 patients were identified. A minimum 8-week interval was associated with increased odds of pCR (odds ratio (OR) 1·41, 95 per cent c.i. 1·30 to 1·52; P < 0·001) and tumour downstaging (OR 1·18, 1·05 to 1·32; P = 0·004). R0 resection rates, TME completeness, lymph node yield, sphincter preservation, stoma formation and complication rates were similar between the two groups. The increased rate of pCR translated to reduced distant metastasis (OR 0·71, 0·54 to 0·93; P = 0·01) and overall recurrence (OR 0·76, 0·58 to 0·98; P = 0·04), but not local recurrence (OR 0·83, 0·49 to 1·42; P = 0·50). CONCLUSION: A minimum 8-week interval from the end of nCRT to TME increases pCR and downstaging rates, and improves recurrence-free survival without compromising surgical morbidity.

ANTECEDENTES: El tratamiento estándar actual del cáncer de recto localmente avanzado (locally advanced rectal cancer, LARC) consiste en quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante de ciclo largo (neoadjuvant, long-course chemoradiation, nCRT) seguida de exéresis total del mesorrecto (total mesorectal excision, TME). De forma convencional, la cirugía se realiza a las 6-8 semanas después de la nCRT. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar el efecto sobre los resultados de ampliar este intervalo. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de los estudios que analizaban los resultados oncológicos, comparando el intervalo clásico (< 8 semanas) desde el final de la nCRT hasta la TME con un intervalo mínimo de 8 semanas, en pacientes con LARC. El criterio de valoración principal fue la tasa de respuesta patológica completa (pathologic complete response, pCR). Los criterios de valoración secundarios fueron las tasas de supervivencia sin recidiva (recurrence-free survival, RFS), recidiva local (local recurrence, LR) y metástasis a distancia (distant metastasis, DM), tasas de resección R0, integridad (completeness) del mesorrecto, afectación del margen de resección, preservación esfinteriana, formación de estoma, fuga anastomótica y otras complicaciones. Se realizó un metaanálisis utilizando el método de Mantel-Haenszel. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 26 publicaciones, incluidos cuatro ensayos clínicos aleatorizados, con 17.220 pacientes. Un intervalo mínimo de 8 semanas se asoció con un aumento de la razón de oportunidades (odds ratio, OR) de pCR (OR, 1,68, i.c. del 95% 1,37-2,06, P < 0,001) y de disminución del estadio tumoral (OR 1,18, i.c. del 95% 1,05-1,32, P = 0,004). Los porcentajes de resección R0, integridad del mesorrecto, ganglios linfáticos identificados, preservación esfinteriana, formación de estoma y complicaciones fueron similares entre los dos grupos. El aumento del porcentaje de pCR se tradujo en una disminución de las DM (OR 0,71, i.c. del 95% 0,54-0,93, P = 0,01) y de la recidiva global (OR 0,76, i.c. del 95% 0,58-0,98, P = 0,04), pero no de la LR (OR 0,83, i.c. del 95% 0,49-1,42, P = 0,50). CONCLUSIÓN: Un intervalo mínimo de 8 semanas entre el final de la nCRT y la TME aumenta las tasas de pCR y la reducción del estadio tumoral, así como mejora la RFS sin comprometer la morbilidad quirúrgica.

Terbinafine: tolerability in general medical practice.

Four open, prospective, postmarketing studies with consistent protocols were undertaken, involving over 25,000 patients and nearly 3600 physicians in four European countries (UK, Netherlands, Germany and Austria). The purpose was to determine the tolerability of terbinafine when prescribed to a large, unselected patient population in general medical practice. Patients were recruited from dermatology departments and from general and family practitioners. All received at least one dose of terbinafine. No specific exclusion criteria were applied. The only treatment instructions provided were those contained in the manufacturer's product information. Patients were monitored for adverse events at baseline, during treatment, and at the end of treatment. Of the 25,884 patients entering the study, 38.6% (9991) had concomitant disease, 42.8% (11,078) were taking other medications, and 22.7% (5876) were older than 60 years. The predominant indication for prescribing terbinafine was onychomycosis. Mean duration of treatment was 13.2 weeks. No adverse events were reported in 89.5% (23,167) of patients. The remaining 10.5% (2717) reported one or more adverse events, primarily gastrointestinal (4.9%) or dermatological (2.3%). A total of 115 serious adverse events were recorded, but of these only four were probably and eight possibly related to terbinafine. There were no reported drug-drug interactions, even in patients receiving concomitant medications metabolized by cytochrome P-450 enzymes. There were also no clinically significant drug-disease interactions. In conclusion, terbinafine is well tolerated in an unselected general practice population. This confirms its good tolerability previously established during controlled clinical trials.

Postmarketing surveillance of oral terbinafine in the UK: report of a large cohort study.

1. The safety profile of terbinafine, the first orally active allylamine, was monitored in the UK in a post-marketing setting. The study recruited 10,361 patients, a number which is approximately 5% of the population who received oral terbinafine in the UK during the period of the study. 2. Follow-up data were available on 9,879 patients. During the course of the study 14.5% patients reported medical events. 49% were thought to be possibly or probably related to terbinafine treatment. Seventy-four of the events (< 1%) were classified as 'serious' and of these only five were assessed as possibly or probably related to treatment. 3. Taste disturbance occurred in 0.6% of the patients and emerged as the only new adverse reaction probably attributable to terbinafine: this was significantly commoner in females and reversible on stopping treatment, with a median time to recovery of 42 days. 4. The study approach successfully combined hospital based dermatology outpatient and general practice centres. Source data verification was conducted on 13% of the cohort selected randomly. 5. Overall, the denominator-based description of the safety profile in actual practice shows terbinafine to be well-tolerated against a wide background of age and coexisting illness.

A comparison of the ocular hypotensive effect of 0.025% bromocriptine and 0.25% timolol eye drops in normal human volunteers.

1. The ocular hypotensive effect of 0.025% bromocriptine and 0.25% timolol eye drops was compared in nine healthy human volunteers, using non-contact tonometry. 2. Considering all post-dosing measurements compared with placebo and including the baseline values as continuous independent variables, using multiple linear regression analysis, both bromocriptine and timolol had a significant ocular hypotensive effect (P less than 0.0001) in the treated eye with a significant but lesser effect in the contralateral eye. 3. In the concentrations used, timolol was more efficacious than bromocriptine in lowering intraocular pressure (P less than 0.025). 4. Using other forms of vehicles for bromocriptine to improve efficacy and studying the ocular hypotensive effect of topical application of other dopamine-2-receptor agonists such as pergolide and lisuride was suggested.