RESUMO
RESUMEN Para que una alteración física sea considerada una enfermedad, debe cumplir con los criterios definidos por la OMS. El miocardio no compacto (MNC) es una hipertrabeculación ventricular no bien definida, de la que se duda si es una miocardiopatía en sí misma, o solo una variación de la normalidad. Nosotros analizamos 161 resonancias magnéticas cardíacas realizadas a 140 pacientes con MNC y sus relaciones con otras patologías, exponiéndolos a los criterios de "enfermedad" definidos por la OMS. Tras un análisis crítico, consideramos que no debería ser considerada una miocardiopatía en sí misma, sino una adaptación miocárdica ante condiciones adversas.
ABSTRACT For a physical alteration to be considered a disease, it must meet the criteria defined by the WHO. Non-compact myocardium (NCM) is a non-well-defined ventricular hypertrabeculation, where there are doubts whether it is a cardiomyopathy itself or just a variation of normality. We analyzed 161 studies in 140 patients with NCM and their relationships with other pathologies, exposing them to the "disease" criteria defined by the WHO. After a critical analysis, we consider that it should not be considered a cardiomyopathy in itself, but rather a myocardial adaptation to adverse conditions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) is useful in the evaluation of systolic and diastolic function. It allows assessment of ventricular dynamics in its longitudinal axis. We sought to investigate the difference in systolic and diastolic longitudinal function in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) with normal and reduced ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred ten outpatients with CHF and 68 controls were included. Ejection fraction (EF) was obtained and longitudinal systolic (S) and diastolic (E' and A') wall velocities were recorded from basal septum. Group A (controls) were normal and CHF patients were classified by EF in Group B1: > 45% and B2: < or = 45%. In A, B1 and B2 the mean S peak was 7.74; 5.45 and 4.89 cm/s (p<0.001); the mean E' peak was 8.56; 5.72 and 6.1 cm/s (p<0.001); and the mean A' peak was 10.2; 7.3 and 5.3 cm/s (p<0.001). Also, isovolumic contraction and relaxation time were different among control and CHF groups, (both p<0.001). The most useful parameters for identifying diastolic CHF were IVRT and S peak, with area under ROC curves of 0.93 and 0.89. The cut-off of 115 ms for IVRT and 5.8 cm/s for S peak showed a sensitivity of 94 and 97%, with a specificity of 82 and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that impairment of left ventricular systolic function is present even in those with diastolic heart failure, and that abnormalities may have an important role to identifying the condition.
