Instruments to assess post-intensive care syndrome assessment: a scoping review and modified Delphi method study.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) is challenging due to the numerous types of instruments. We herein attempted to identify and propose recommendations for instruments to assess PICS in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review to identify PICS follow-up studies at and after hospital discharge between 2014 and 2022. Assessment instruments used more than two times were included in the modified Delphi consensus process. A modified Delphi meeting was conducted three times by the PICS committee of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and each score was rated as not important (score: 1-3), important, but not critical (4-6), and critical (7-9). We included instruments with ≥ 70% of respondents rating critical and ≤ 15% of respondents rating not important. RESULTS: In total, 6972 records were identified in this scoping review, and 754 studies were included in the analysis. After data extraction, 107 PICS assessment instruments were identified. The modified Delphi meeting reached 20 PICS assessment instrument recommendations: (1) in the physical domain: the 6-min walk test, MRC score, and grip strength, (2) in cognition: MoCA, MMSE, and SMQ, (3) in mental health: HADS, IES-R, and PHQ-9, (4) in the activities of daily living: the Barthel Index, IADL, and FIM, (5) in quality of life: SF-36, SF-12, EQ-5D-5L, 3L, and VAS (6), in sleep and pain: PSQI and Brief Pain Inventory, respectively, and (7) in the PICS-family domain: SF-36, HADS, and IES-R. CONCLUSION: Based on a scoping review and the modified Delphi method, 20 PICS assessment instruments are recommended to assess physical, cognitive, mental health, activities of daily living, quality of life, sleep, and pain in ICU survivors and their families.

Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Patients 2023 (J-ReCIP 2023).

Providing standardized, high-quality rehabilitation for critically ill patients is a crucial issue. In 2017, the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (JSICM) promulgated the "Evidence-Based Expert Consensus for Early Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Unit" to advocate for the early initiation of rehabilitations in Japanese intensive care settings. Building upon this seminal work, JSICM has recently conducted a rigorous systematic review utilizing the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This endeavor resulted in the formulation of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs), designed to elucidate best practices in early ICU rehabilitation. The primary objective of this guideline is to augment clinical understanding and thereby facilitate evidence-based decision-making, ultimately contributing to the enhancement of patient outcomes in critical care settings. No previous CPGs in the world has focused specifically on rehabilitation of critically ill patients, using the GRADE approach. Multidisciplinary collaboration is extremely important in rehabilitation. Thus, the CPGs were developed by 73 members of a Guideline Development Group consisting of a working group, a systematic review group, and an academic guideline promotion group, with the Committee for the Clinical Practice Guidelines of Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation in Intensive Care of the JSICM at its core. Many members contributed to the development of the guideline, including physicians and healthcare professionals with multiple and diverse specialties, as well as a person who had been patients in ICU. Based on discussions among the group members, eight important clinical areas of focus for this CPG were identified. Fourteen important clinical questions (CQs) were then developed for each area. The public was invited to comment twice, and the answers to the CQs were presented in the form of 10 GRADE recommendations and commentary on the four background questions. In addition, information for each CQ has been created as a visual clinical flow to ensure that the positioning of each CQ can be easily understood. We hope that the CPGs will be a useful tool in the rehabilitation of critically ill patients for multiple professions.

Lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor-targeted antibody-drug conjugate demonstrates potent antitumor activity against epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a lethal malignant tumor, for which new treatment options are urgently required. Lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptor (LSR) is widely expressed in EOC, and it is associated with poor prognosis. In this study, we developed an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting LSR as a new therapeutic approach to EOC. METHODS: We, herein, developed novel anti-LSR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and an LSR-ADC by conjugating monomethyl auristatin E as a payload. We subsequently evaluated the in vitro and in vivo (on xenograft models) antitumor effect of the LSR-ADC. RESULTS: An overexpression of LSR was observed not only in the primary EOC tumor but also in its lymph node and omental metastases. The EOC cell lines NOVC7-C and OVCAR3 strongly expressed LSR (as compared to ES2 cells). Both the anti-LSR mAb and the LSR-ADC were able to specifically bind to LSR-positive cells and were rapidly internalized and trafficked to the lysosomes. The LSR-ADC demonstrated a potent antitumor effect against NOVC-7C and OVCAR3, but little activity against ES2 cells. In vitro, the LSR-ADC exhibited a potent antitumor effect against NOVC-7C and OVCAR3. Moreover, in the OVCAR3 xenograft models as well as in the patient-derived xenograft models of LSR-positive EOC, the LSR-ADC significantly inhibited tumor growth. The LSR-ADC also suppressed the omental/bowel metastases in OVCAR3-Luc xenografts and improved the median survival. CONCLUSION: The developed LSR-ADC demonstrated a significant antitumor activity against LSR-positive EOC cell lines and tumors. Our preclinical data support the use of the LSR-ADC as a novel therapy for patients with LSR-positive ovarian cancer.

Gene therapy with SOCS1 induces potent preclinical antitumor activities in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Constitutive activation of STAT3 promotes oncogenesis and growth of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). We investigated the mechanism of action of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1), an endogenous inhibitor of JAK, as gene therapy for OSCC. METHODS: Antitumor effect of SOCS1 was compared to JAK inhibitor I by cell proliferation assay, cell cycle analysis, and apoptosis analysis in vitro. In addition, antitumor effect was evaluated using xenograft mouse models in vivo. RESULTS: JAK inhibitor I inhibited the proliferation of KOSC2 cl3-43 or T3M-1 clone2 OSCC cell lines in vitro. While JAK inhibitor I arrested both cell lines at the G2/M phase, induction of apoptosis was observed in T3M-1 clone2 cells, but not KOSC2-cl3-43 cells. An adenoviral vector expressing SOCS1 (AdSOCS1) significantly decreased the proliferation of both OSCC cell lines and induced G2/M phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, suggesting that induction of apoptosis of KOSC2 cl3-43 cells by AdSOCS1 is regulated by the JAK/STAT independent pathway. Overexpression of SOCS1 inhibited activation of the JAK/STAT and p44/42 MAPK pathways, while JAK inhibitor I inhibited activation of the JAK/STAT pathway only. Consistently, expression of Mcl-1 was decreased by overexpression of SOCS1, but not JAK inhibitor I. Additionally, KOSC2 cl3-43 or T3M-1 clone2 OSCC cells were subcutaneously implanted in the flanks of two xenograft mouse models. As compared to a control adenovirus vector (AdLacZ), intratumor injection of AdSOCS1 significantly decreased the tumor volume and induced apoptosis in vivo. CONCLUSION: SOCS1 gene therapy may be a beneficial approach for the treatment of OSCC.

Minimum standards of clinical practice for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Early mobilization and rehabilitation has become common and expectations for physical therapists working in intensive care units have increased in Japan. The objective of this study was to establish consensus-based minimum clinical practice standards for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan. It also aimed to make an international comparison of minimum clinical practice standards in this area. METHODS: In total, 54 experienced physical therapists gave informed consent and participated in this study. A modified Delphi method with questionnaires was used over three rounds. Participants rated 272 items as "essential/unknown/non-essential". Consensus was considered to be reached on items that over 70% of physical therapists rated as "essential" to clinical practice in the intensive care unit. RESULTS: Of the 272 items in the first round, 188 were deemed essential. In round 2, 11 of the 62 items that failed to reach consensus in round 1 were additionally deemed essential. No item was added to the "essential" consensus in round 3. In total, 199 items were therefore deemed essential as a minimum standard of clinical practice. Participants agreed that 42 items were not essential and failed to reach agreement on 31 others. Identified 199 items were different from those in the UK and Australia due to national laws, cultural and historical backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to develop a consensus-based minimum clinical practice standard for physical therapists working in intensive care units in Japan.

Indirect Calorimetry Measurement of Energy Expenditure Related to Body Position Changes in Healthy Adults.

Early mobilization is advocated to prevent intensive care unit-acquired physical weakness, but the patient's workload and its changes in response to body position changes have not been established. We used indirect calorimetry to determine the energy expenditure (EE) in response to body position changes, and we assessed EE's correlation with respiratory parameters in healthy volunteers: 8 males and 8 females, mean age 23.4±1.3 years. The subjects started in the resting supine position followed by a 30° head-up position, a 60° head-up position, an upright sitting position, a standing position, and the resting supine position. EE was determined in real time by indirect calorimetry monitoring the subject's respiratory rate, tidal volume (VT), and minute volume (MV). The highest values were observed immediately after the subjects transitioned from standing to supine, and this was significantly higher compared to the original supine position (1,450±285 vs. 2,004±519 kcal/day, p<0.01). Moderate correlations were observed between VT and EE (r=0.609, p<0.001) and between MV and EE (r=0.576, p<0.001). Increasing VT or MV indicates an increasing patient workload during mobilization. Monitoring these parameters may contribute to safe rehabilitation. Further studies should assess EE in critically ill patients.