RESUMO
In patients with systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE), interstitial cystitis(lupus cystitis) is an uncommon, but important manifestation. We report two Japanese patients with lupus cystitis. Case 1 was a 49-year-old woman diagnosed as having rheumatoid arthritis and membranous nephropathy. She was treated with prednisolone(5 mg daily). Case 2 was a 41-year-old woman also diagnosed as having rheumatoid arthritis previously and treated with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Both cases presented abdominal pain, vomiting, dysuria and frequency of micturition. We diagnosed these cases as SLE on the basis of arthritis, renal disorder(proteinuria and hematuria), and positive antinuclear and anti-dsDNA antibodies. In addition, bilateral hydronephrosis was found in both cases. Thus, they were also diagnosed as probable lupus cystitis. The patients were treated with one cycle of methylprednisolone pulse therapy. Thereafter they were treated with 60 mg/day of prednisolone and their symptoms resolved promptly. Furthermore, no abnormal finding was found by abdominal ultrasonography and/or the intravenous pyelogram after therapy. Renal biopsies were performed and both cases showed lupus glomerulopathy (case 1: WHO class Vb, case II: WHO class IVb). Abdominal pain and/or dysuria, which is common in SLE patients, requires further examinations to evaluate the lupus cystitis.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Cistite Intersticial/tratamento farmacológico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Nefrite Lúpica/tratamento farmacológico , Prednisolona/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Cistite Intersticial/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/complicações , Nefrite Lúpica/complicações , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , PulsoterapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bucillamine, a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug widely prescribed in Japan, is reported to be a cause of proteinuria. However, to date, the clinical course of the nephropathy associated with the use of bucillamine has not been described in detail. METHODS: We analyzed renal biopsy findings from 10 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and concomitant bucillamine-induced nephropathy. Each patient was followed up until proteinuria had resolved. RESULTS: Proteinuria appeared 2-11 months after the initiation of the treatment with bucillamine. Nine patients, who stopped bucillamine treatment immediately (within 3 months) after the onset of proteinuria, were diagnosed as having stage I membranous nephropathy. Only one patient, who used bucillamine for 9.5 months after the onset of proteinuria, was diagnosed as having stage II membranous nephropathy. In all patients with stage I membranous nephropathy, the proteinuria disappeared within 7 months after they stopped bucillamine treatment. On the other hand, in the patient with stage II membranous nephropathy, the proteinuria persisted for 14 months after the use of bucillamine was stopped. In all the patients, the proteinuria resolved completely without deterioration of renal function. None of the patients has experienced recurrence of proteinuria. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with proteinuria induced by treatment with bucillamine, membranous nephropathy is the most common disorder. Immediate withdrawal of bucillamine results in prompt and complete resolution of proteinuria without deterioration of renal function.Bucillamine, a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug widely prescribed in Japan, is reported to be a cause of proteinuria. However, to date, the clinical course of the nephropathy associated with the use of bucillamine has not been described in detail.