Adherence to adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring among adults with disabilities.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with developmental and/or intellectual disabilities (I/DD) are at a greater risk for atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia. AF is associated with heart failure, stroke, poor mental health, and reduced quality of life. Management and treatment decisions are based on the ability to detect AF; however, noninvasive, remote cardiac monitoring may not be tolerated by individuals with I/DD. OBJECTIVE: To examine adherence to the placement of an ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring patch device by adult patients with I/DD. METHODS: Investigators extracted chart data from a consecutive series of adult patients (18 years+) who received the patch device as part of standard treatment at an adult health center between November 1, 2015 and October 31, 2019. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included in data analysis. Average age of subjects was 53.8 ± 13.9 years (range: 20.2-88.5); 66.7% were male. All subjects had intellectual disabilities as follows: mild, 37.9%; moderate, 29.5%; severe, 21.0%; and, profound, 11.6%. With a prescribed duration of 14 days, subjects wore the device a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 12.2 days (4.1-14.0); total analysis time was a median of 9.5 days (3.4-13.5). A total of 29 subjects (30.5%) received cardiac diagnoses not previously identified (median = 1 new diagnosis; range: 1-5). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests the possible utility of an ambulatory monitoring patch device in an adult population with I/DD. Investigators recommend larger studies to confirm such preliminary findings to ultimately improve clinical management and patient quality of life.

Technology and social media use by adult patients with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities.

BACKGROUND: Technology and social media offer individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (I/DD) unique and innovative ways to facilitate active participation in their own healthcare process. What remains unclear is the extent to which devices are currently used by this growing patient population. OBJECTIVE: To explore the prevalence of technology and social media use, as well as the possible barriers, among adult patients with I/DD. METHODS: A cross-sectional study utilizing an anonymous, accessible survey was used to obtain data from all adult patients (18 + years of age) with I/DD presenting for primary care services at a healthcare facility in New York between September and December of 2016. RESULTS: A total of 370 individuals completed the survey (529 approached, 69.9% response rate). Less than half (44.6%) of respondents used devices such as a tablet, smartphone or desktop; most (86.8%) did not use social media. Only 21.6% of respondents indicated that they use some type of assistive technology. While some respondents (46.0%) were identified by their caregivers as having a disability that would prevent them from learning/using technology, other respondents reported having no challenges (18.0%), needing training and/or ongoing support (7.4%), or being uncertain as to whether they would experience any challenges (15.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Many adult patients with I/DD do not use technology and social media that could promote self-determination and participation in their healthcare. Continued efforts must be made to promote technology use among adults with I/DD and to ensure that appropriate training is available for both the individual and his/her caregivers to achieve adoption and utilization.