Assessment of genotyping array performance for genome-wide association studies and imputation in African cattle.

BACKGROUND: In cattle, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have largely focused on European or Asian breeds, using genotyping arrays that were primarily designed for European cattle. Because there is growing interest in performing GWAS in African breeds, we have assessed the performance of 23 commercial bovine genotyping arrays for capturing the diversity across African breeds and performing imputation. We used 409 whole-genome sequences (WGS) spanning global cattle breeds, and a real cohort of 2481 individuals (including African breeds) that were genotyped with the Illumina high-density (HD) array and the GeneSeek bovine 50 k array. RESULTS: We found that commercially available arrays were not effective in capturing variants that segregate among African indicine animals. Only 6% of these variants in high linkage disequilibrium (LD) (r2 > 0.8) were on the best performing arrays, which contrasts with the 17% and 25% in African and European taurine cattle, respectively. However, imputation from available HD arrays can successfully capture most variants (accuracies up to 0.93), mainly when using a global, not continent-specific, reference panel, which partially reflects the unusually high levels of admixture on the continent. When considering functional variants, the GGPF250 array performed best for tagging WGS variants and imputation. Finally, we show that imputation from low-density arrays can perform almost as well as HD arrays, if a two-stage imputation approach is adopted, i.e. first imputing to HD and then to WGS, which can potentially reduce the costs of GWAS. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the choice of an array should be based on a balance between the objective of the study and the breed/population considered, with the HD and BOS1 arrays being the best choice for both taurine and indicine breeds when performing GWAS, and the GGPF250 being preferable for fine-mapping studies. Moreover, our results suggest that there is no advantage to using the indicus-specific arrays for indicus breeds, regardless of the objective. Finally, we show that using a reference panel that better represents global bovine diversity improves imputation accuracy, particularly for non-European taurine populations.

Low Zika virus seroprevalence among pregnant women in North Central Nigeria, 2016.

BACKGROUND: Zika virus (ZIKV) has been known for decades in Africa but contemporary data is lacking at large. OBJECTIVES: To describe the seroepidemiology of ZIKV in North Central Nigeria. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional study at six health care facilities in North Central Nigeria from January to December 2016. Detection of ZIKV antibodies was done using an anti-ZIKV recombinant non-structural protein 1 (NS1)-based ELISA. A colorimetric assay to detect ZIKV neutralizing antibodies was used on ELISA reactive and randomly selected ELISA non-reactive samples. ZIKV real-time RT-PCR was done on a subset of samples. RESULTS: A total of 468 individual samples were included with almost 60% from pregnant women. Using NS1-based ELISA, an anti-ZIKV positive rate of 6% for IgM and 4% for IgG was found. Pregnant women showed anti-ZIKV positive rates of 4% for IgM and 3% for IgG. None of the ZIKV antibody positive samples tested ZIKV RT-PCR positive. An association with male sex was found for anti-ZIKV IgG ELISA positivity (prevalence ratio 3.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.48-8.25; p = .004). No association with pregnancy, yellow fever vaccination or malaria was found for anti-ZIKV IgM or IgG positivity. ZIKV neutralizing antibodies were detected in 17/18 (94%) anti-ZIKV NS1 positive/borderline samples and in one sample without detectable ZIKV NS1 antibodies. Partial ZIKV E gene sequence was retrieved in one sample without ZIKV antibodies, which clustered within the West African ZIKV lineage. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a largely ZIKV immunologically naïve population and reinforce the importance of ZIKV surveillance in Africa.