Reproducibility and its confounders of CMR feature tracking myocardial strain analysis in patients with suspected myocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) is an emerging technique for assessing myocardial strain with valuable diagnostic and prognostic potential. However, the reproducibility of biventricular CMR-FT analysis in a large cardiovascular population has not been assessed. Also, evidence of confounders impacting reader reproducibility for CMR-FT in patients is unknown and currently limits the clinical implementation of this technique. METHODS: From a dual-center database of patients referred to CMR for suspected myocarditis, 125 patients were randomly selected to undergo biventricular CMR-FT analysis for 2-dimensional systolic and diastolic measures, with additional 3-dimensional analysis for the left ventricle. All image analysis was replicated by a single reader and by a second reader for intra- and inter-reader analysis (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). Reliability was tested with intraclass correlation (ICC) tests, and the impact of imaging confounders on agreement was assessed through multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Left and right ventricular ejection fractions were reduced in 34% and 37% of the patients, respectively. Good to excellent reliability was shown for 2D (all ICC > 0.85) and 3D (all ICC > 0.70) peak strain and early diastolic strain rate for both ventricles in longitudinal orientation as well as circumferential orientations for the left ventricle. An increased slice number improved agreement while the presence of pericardial effusion compromised diastolic strain rate agreement, and arrhythmia compromised right ventricular agreement. CONCLUSION: In a large clinical cohort, we could show CMR-FT yields excellent inter-reader and intra-reader reproducibility. Multi-parametric CMR-FT of the right and left ventricles appears to be a robust tool in cardiovascular patients referred to CMR. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03470571, NCT04774549. Key Points • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) is an emerging technique to measure myocardial strain in cardiovascular patients referred for CMR; however, the evaluation of its reproducibility in a large cohort has not yet been performed. • In a large clinical cohort, CMR-FT yields excellent inter-reader and intra-reader reproducibility for both left and right ventricular systolic and diastolic parameters. • Arrhythmia and pericardial effusion compromise agreement of select FT parameters, but poor ejection fraction does not.

Feature Tracking Myocardial Strain Incrementally Improves Prognostication in Myocarditis Beyond Traditional CMR Imaging Features.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the association of cardiovascular cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) with outcome in a patient cohort with myocarditis and evaluated the possible incremental prognostic benefit beyond clinical features and traditional CMR features. BACKGROUND: CMR is used to diagnose and risk stratify patients with myocarditis. CMR-FT allows quantitative strain analysis of myocardial function; however, its prognostic benefit in myocarditis is unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients with clinically suspected myocarditis and presence of midmyocardial or epicardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and/or myocardial edema in CMR were included. Clinical and CMR features were analyzed with regard to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (i.e., hospitalization for heart failure, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and all-cause mortality). RESULTS: Of 740 patients with clinically suspected myocarditis, 455 (61%) met our final diagnostic criteria based on CMR tissue characterization. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, MACE occurred in 74 (16%) patients. In the univariable analysis, CMR-FT global longitudinal peak strain (GLS) was significantly associated with MACE. In a multivariable model adjusting for clinical variables (age, sex, body mass index, and acuteness of symptoms) and traditional CMR features (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] and LGE extent), GLS remained independently associated with outcome (GLS hazard ratio: 1.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.36; p = 0.001) and incrementally improved prognostication (chi-square increases from 42.6 to 79.8 to 88.5; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial strain using CMR-FT provides independent and incremental prognostic value over clinical features, LVEF, and LGE in patients with myocarditis. CMR-FT may serve as a novel marker to improve risk stratification in myocarditis. (CMR Features in Patients With Suspected Myocarditis [CMRMyo]; NCT03470571).