A comparison of manual versus hydrostatic reduction in children with intussusception: single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: In recent years several techniques have been recommended for intussusception treatment. In this study, an evaluation was made of intussusception cases that presented at our clinic and had reduction applied together with saline under ultrasonography (USG) and cases, which were surgically treated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was made of the records of 72 cases treated for a diagnosis of intussusception between January 2010 and July 2012. Patients were evaluated demographics, clinical presentation, management strategy, during the hospitalisation and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 72 cases which consists of 44 male and 28 female with age range between 5 and 132 months were treated with a diagnosis of intussusception. USG was applied to all cases on initial presentation. As treatment, hydrostatic reduction (HR) together with USG was applied to 47 cases. Of these, the HR was unsuccessful in 13 cases. Surgical treatment was applied to 38 cases. Of these cases, ileocolic intussusception was observed in 30 cases, ileoileal in seven cases and colocolic in one case. Meckel diverticulum was determined in five of these cases, polyps in two cases, lymphoma in two cases, lymph nodule in one case and 28 cases were observed to be idiopathic. There was no mortality in any case. CONCLUSION: HR together with USG is a safe technique in the treatment of intussusception, which also shortens the duration of hospitalisation and significantly reduces the treatment costs.

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy of diltiazem, glyceryl trinitrate, and lidocaine for the treatment of anal fissure in children.

PURPOSE: Anal fissure (AF) is a common perianal condition in children. Although adult patients with AF have been treated successfully using diltiazem, it has not been studied in children. The present randomized, prospective, double-blind study assessed the response, side effects, and recurrence of diltiazem. METHODS: Ninety-three children with AF were randomly divided into three groups. Each group received topical ointment. Group GTN received 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate, group L received 10% lidocaine, and group D received 2% diltiazem ointment. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients completed the 12-month study. At the end of the first 8-week course, the healing rate in group D was significantly higher than that of the other groups (p < 0.0001, χ (2) = 19.82). Nonresponders received a second course of the same treatment. Group D showed significantly higher healing rates than the other groups (p < 0.05, χ (2) = 7.227) at the end of the second 8-week course. The group D recurrence rate was significantly different than that of the other groups (p < 0. 002, χ (2) = 12.79). CONCLUSION: Diltiazem application is effective and safe for the treatment of AF in children, and has a low recurrence rate. The smooth dose-concentration curve causes minimal side effects.