Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Data Brief ; 32: 106167, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32904335

RESUMO

Following the piloting of VaxTrac, an electronic immunization registry (EIR), we conducted a rapid assessment in November-December 2017 to evaluate the use of the EIR in 10 health facilities in Western Area Urban district in Sierra Leone [1]. In this data-in-brief report, we provide additional descriptive data from the assessment of the VaxTrac EIR in Sierra Leone. The assessment comprised aggregate data on vaccine doses administered that were abstracted from VaxTrac and three paper-based sources (daily tally sheets, register of children under the age of 2 years, and a summary form of doses administered). Data were abstracted for the following six vaccine doses in the immunization schedule in Sierra Leone: 1) Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine, 2) first dose of pentavalent vaccine, 3) second dose of pentavalent vaccine, 4) third dose of pentavalent vaccine, 5) first dose of measles-containing vaccine, and 6) second dose of measles-containing vaccine. We descriptively analysed the abstracted data to examine the congruity between VaxTrac records and the three paper-based sources. Bar graphs were generated to visually depict the variations in number of administered vaccine doses by data source for each health facility. We provide the aggregated data for each vaccine dose abstracted by data source from each health facility as supplemental material (Excel file). The supplementary data reveal patterns in the congruity of vaccine doses captured that have implications for policy and programmatic decisions regarding the use of VaxTrac and other similar EIRs in low resource urban settings.

2.
Vaccine ; 38(39): 6103-6111, 2020 09 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32753291

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation (MoHS) piloted VaxTrac, an electronic immunization registry (EIR), in an urban district to improve management of vaccination records and tracking of children who missed scheduled doses. We aimed to document lessons learned to inform decision-making on VaxTrac and similar EIRs' future use. METHODS: Ten out of 50 urban health facilities that implemented VaxTrac were purposively selected for inclusion in a rapid mixed-method assessment from November to December 2017. For a one-month period, records of six scheduled vaccine doses among children < 2 years old in VaxTrac were abstracted and compared to three paper-based records (register of under-two children, daily tally sheet, and monthly summary form). We used the under-two register as the reference gold standard for comparison purposes. We interviewed and observed 10 heath workers, one from each selected facility, who were using VaxTrac. RESULTS: Overall, VaxTrac captured < 65% of the vaccine doses reported in the paper-based sources, but in the largest health facility VaxTrac captured the highest number of doses. Two additional notable patterns emerged: 1) the aggregated data sources reported higher doses administered compared to the under-two register and VaxTrac; 2) data sources that need real-time data capture during the vaccination session reported fewer doses administered compared to the monthly HF2 summary form. Health workers expressed that the EIR helped them to shorten the time to manage, summarize, and report vaccination records. Workflows for data entry in VaxTrac were inconsistent among facilities and rarely integrated into existing processes. Data sharing restrictions contributed to duplicate records. CONCLUSION: Although VaxTrac helped to shorten the time to manage, summarize, and report vaccination records, data sharing restrictions coupled with inconsistent and inefficient workflows were major implementation challenges. Readiness-to-introduce and sustainability should be carefully considered before implementing an EIR.


Assuntos
Confiabilidade dos Dados , Imunização , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Eletrônica , Humanos , Políticas , Sistema de Registros , Serra Leoa/epidemiologia , Vacinação
3.
Pan Afr Med J ; 25(Suppl 1): 10, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28149435

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a chronic, zoonotic, multi-species disease of cattle caused by Mycobacterium bovis. In developed countries, effective surveillance and enforcement of regulations on bTB control resulted in significant reduction of infections in cattle and hence, humans. However, in developing countries, weak surveillance systems affect accurate and timely reporting of bTB in humans and cattle. In Ghana, transhumance movement of cattle increases the risk of bTB importation and spread, however, the extent to which surveillance detects bTB is unknown. We therefore evaluated the bTB surveillance system in the Greater-Accra Region to determine its performance and assessed its attributes. METHODS: We interviewed stakeholders, and reviewed bTB surveillance data for all ten districts in the region from 2006-2011 using the CDC Guidelines for Evaluation of public health surveillance systems. RESULTS: From 2006-2011, bTB was suspected in 284/244,576 (0.12%) cattle slaughtered, of which 7/284 (2.5%) were submitted for laboratory confirmation and all tested positive. Predictive value positive was 100%. There is no standard case definition which guides bTB detection. Fifty percent of carcasses slip through inspection, and confirmed cases are not traced back. There were 99/284 (34.9%) condemnations from suspected carcasses and 57/97 (58.8%) from positive reactors from screening. Ninety percent (9/10) of districts submitted reports late to the region whereas representativeness was 30%. Regional and district data were manually stored with no electronic backups. The region's cattle population is unknown. CONCLUSION: Although the bTB surveillance system is sensitive, it is under performing, and the possibility of bTB transmission from cattle to humans is high.


Assuntos
Mycobacterium bovis/isolamento & purificação , Vigilância em Saúde Pública/métodos , Tuberculose Bovina/epidemiologia , Animais , Bovinos , Gana/epidemiologia , Guias como Assunto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
4.
Pan Afr Med J ; 25(Suppl 1): 16, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28149441

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) continue to pose threats to human health and development worldwide. Though preventable, NCDs kill more people annually than all other diseases combined. The four major NCDs namely cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes and cancers share common modifiable risk factors. In order to prevent and control NCDs, Ghana has adopted the World Health Organisation Package for Essential NCD (WHO-PEN) intervention, to be piloted in selected districts before a nationwide scale-up. We assessed the capacity of these facilities for the implementation of the WHO-PEN pilot. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional health facility-based survey using a multistage sampling technique. We collected data on human resource, equipment, service utilization, medicines availability and health financing through interviews and observation. Descriptive data analysis was performed and expressed in frequencies and relative frequencies. RESULTS: In all, 23 health facilities comprising two regional hospitals, three district hospitals, nine health centres and nine Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) compounds from three regions were surveyed. All the hospitals had medical officers whilst 4 (44.4%) of the health centres had physician assistants. Health financing is mainly by the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). None of the health facilities had spacers and only one health centre had oxygen cylinder, glucometer and nebulizer. CONCLUSION: Gaps exist in the human resource capacity and service delivery at the primary care levels, the focus of WHO-PEN intervention. Adequately equipping the primary health care level with trained health workers, basic equipment, medications and diagnostics will optimize the performance of WHO-PEN intervention when implemented.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Instalações de Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doença Crônica , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/prevenção & controle , Gana , Financiamento da Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias/etiologia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Projetos Piloto , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...