RESUMO
Fundamento y objetivo: Diferentes sociedades científicas proponen el uso de escalas de severidad más otros criterios adicionales para determinar el lugar de tratamiento de la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad. El objetivo de este estudio es correlacionar el riesgo según 3 reglas de predicción clínica (PSI, CURB-65 y PSCURXO-80) y criterios adicionales con la efectividad de la hospitalización a domicilio (HaD).Pacientes y método: Revisión de los casos de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad remitidos por el servicio de urgencias a HaD entre enero de 2000 y mayo de 2008. Se clasifican según 3 escalas de riesgo y presencia de criterios adicionales y se analiza su asociación con la inefectividad de HaD durante el tratamiento.Resultados: Se admitieron 146 mujeres y 181 hombres (edad media=60,3 años). La media de estancia en HaD fue de 8,6 días. Dos pacientes murieron, 25 (7,7%) fueron reenviados a hospitalización convencional, 219 fueron dados de alta sin incidencias y 81 tras superar complicaciones. La HaD fue efectiva en el 92,3% de los pacientes. El porcentaje fue del 85% para PSI=IV o V sin o con CA, del 80% para CURB-65=2 y del 77,5% para valores entre 1019 de PSCURXO-80. La eficacia de HaD se relaciona inversamente con la severidad.Conclusiones: La eficacia de HaD en el tratamiento de neumonía adquirida en la comunidad es menor en los pacientes con mayor gravedad definida por medio de diferentes escalas de predicción clínica, pero es eficaz en un elevado porcentaje de casos en los que está indicado el ingreso hospitalario (AU)
Background and objective: Different scientific societies propose the use of scales of severity and additional criteria (AC) in order to determine the setting for the treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP).The objective of this study is to correlate the risk regarding three clinical prediction rules (PSI, CURB-65 and PSCRUXO-80) and AC with the effectiveness of hospital at home (HaH). Patients and method: Evaluation of cases of CAP referred from the Emergency Unit to HaH between January 2000 and May 2008. They were classified regarding three risk scales and presence of AC and its association with the effectiveness of HaH during the treatment was analysed. Results: 146 women and 181 men were admitted, (mean age, 60.3 years). The average stay in HaH was 8.6 days. Two patients died, 25 (7.7%) were admitted to hospital, 219 progressed favourably throughout and 81 after overcoming complications. Hospital at Home was effective in 92.3% of total patients. The rate was 85% for those in PSI=IV or V with or without additional criteria; 80% for CURB-65=2 and 77.5% for a PSCURXO-80 score of 1019. The effectiveness of HaH is inversely related to severity (AU)ConclusionsHospital a Home (HaD) is an effective and safe care option for many cases of CAP in which hospital admission is normally recommended on the basis of prediction rule scores or additional admission criteria
Assuntos
Humanos , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/terapia , Infecção Hospitalar/terapia , Pneumonia/etiologia , Pneumonia/terapia , Hospitalização , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Different scientific societies propose the use of scales of severity and additional criteria (AC) in order to determine the setting for the treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP).The objective of this study is to correlate the risk regarding three clinical prediction rules (PSI, CURB-65 and PSCRUXO-80) and AC with the effectiveness of hospital at home (HaH). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Evaluation of cases of CAP referred from the Emergency Unit to HaH between January 2000 and May 2008. They were classified regarding three risk scales and presence of AC and its association with the effectiveness of HaH during the treatment was analysed. RESULTS: 146 women and 181 men were admitted, (mean age, 60.3 years). The average stay in HaH was 8.6 days. Two patients died, 25 (7.7%) were admitted to hospital, 219 progressed favourably throughout and 81 after overcoming complications. Hospital at Home was effective in 92.3% of total patients. The rate was 85% for those in PSI=IV or V with or without additional criteria; 80% for CURB-65=2 and 77.5% for a PSCURXO-80 score of 10-19. The effectiveness of HaH is inversely related to severity. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital a Home (HaD) is an effective and safe care option for many cases of CAP in which hospital admission is normally recommended on the basis of prediction rule scores or additional admission criteria.
