Antiviral RNA silencing suppression activity of Tomato spotted wilt virus NSs protein.

In addition to regulating gene expression, RNA silencing is an essential antiviral defense system in plants. Triggered by double-stranded RNA, silencing results in degradation or translational repression of target transcripts. Viruses are inducers and targets of RNA silencing. To condition susceptibility, most plant viruses encode silencing suppressors that interfere with this process, such as the Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) NSs protein. The mechanism by which NSs suppresses RNA silencing and its role in viral infection and movement remain to be determined. We cloned NSs from the Hawaii isolate of TSWV and using two independent assays show for the first time that this protein restored pathogenicity and supported the formation of local infection foci by suppressor-deficient Turnip mosaic virus and Turnip crinkle virus. Demonstrating the suppression of RNA silencing directed against heterologous viruses establishes the foundation to determine the means used by NSs to block this antiviral process.

First Report of Lettuce big-vein associated virus (Varicosavirus) Infecting Lettuce in Mexico.

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) is a common consumed vegetable and a major source of income and nutrition for small farmers in Mexico. This crop is infected with at least nine viruses: Mirafiori lettuce big-vein virus (MiLBVV), Lettuce big-vein associated virus (LBVaV), both transmitted by the soil-borne fungus Olpidium brassicae; Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), Tomato chlorotic spot virus (TCSV), Groundnut ringspot virus (GRSV), Lettuce mottle virus (LMoV), Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Bidens mosaic virus (BiMV), and Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV) (1). From March to May 2012, a disease on lettuce was observed in the south region of Mexico City displaying mild to severe mosaic, leaf deformation, reduced growth, slight thickening of the main vein, and plant death. At the beginning of the epidemic there were just a few plants with visible symptoms and 7 days later the entire crop was affected, causing a loss of 93% of the plants. It was estimated by counting the number of severely affected or dead plants in three plots. No thrips, aphids, or whiteflies were observed in the crop during this time. Twenty plants with similar symptoms were collected and tested by RT-PCR using the primers LBVaVF 5'-AACACTATGGGCATCCACAT-3' and LBVaVR 5'-GCATGTCAGCAATCAGAGGA-3' specific for the coat protein gene of LBVaV, amplifying a 322-bp fragment. Primers CP829F 5'-CCWACTTCATCAGTTGAGCGCTG-3' and CP1418R 5'-TATCAGCTCCCTACACTATCCTCGC-3' were used to detect MiLBVV (2). No amplification was obtained for MiLBVaV in any plants tested. PCR products of approximately 300 bp were obtained from four out of 20 symptomatic lettuce samples tested for LBVaV, but not from healthy plant and water controls. These results suggest the presence of another virus in symptomatic lettuce plants. Amplicons were gel-purified and sequenced using LBVaVF and LBVaVR primers. A consensus sequence was generated using the Bioedit v. 5 program. Both sequences of these Mexican lettuce isolates were 100% identical (Accession Nos. KC776266.1 and KC776267.1) and had identities between 94 and 99% to all sequences of LBVaV available in GenBank. Additionally, when alignments were made using ClustalW, these sequences showed identities of 99.7% to Almeria-Spanish isolate (Accession No. AY581686.1); 99.4% to Granada-Spanish isolate (AY581689.1); 99.1% to Dutch isolate (JN710441.1), Iranian isolate (JN400921.1), Australian isolate (GU220725.1), Brazilian isolate (DQ530354.1), England isolate (AY581690.1), and American isolate (AY496053.1); 96.2% to Australian isolate (GU220722.1); 96.3% to Japanese isolate (AB190527.1); and 92.8% to Murcia-Spanish isolate (AY581691.1). Twenty lettuce plants were mechanically inoculated with leaf tissue taken from the four plants collected in the field and tested positive for LBVaV by RT-PCR; 12 days after inoculation, mosaic symptoms were observed in all inoculated plants and six of them were analyzed individually by RT-PCR obtaining a fragment of the expected size. To our knowledge, this is the first report of LBVaV infecting lettuce in Mexico. Further surveys and monitoring of LBVaV incidence and distribution in the region, vector competence of olpidium species, and impact on the crop quality are in progress. References: (1) P. M. Agenor et al. Plant Viruses 2:35, 2008. (2) R. J. Hayes et al. Plant Dis. 90:233, 2006.

First Report of Pantoea agglomerans Causing Leaf Blight and Vascular Wilt in Maize and Sorghum in Mexico.

Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor are important crops for animal and human nutrition worldwide. In the Central Highland Valley of Mexico, both crops are extremely important, and research is aimed toward increasing yield, disease resistance, and crop adaptation from 1,900- to 2,700-m elevation. In a 3-year field breeding experiment (2004 to 2006), leaf blight and vascular wilt symptoms were frequently observed in contiguous plots of maize and sorghum crops in Montecillo, Mexico and maize plots in Tecamac, Mexico. To identify and characterize the causal agent of these symptoms, isolations were conducted on leaves from areas where healthy and diseased tissues converged. Leaf sections of 1 cm2 from both crops were disinfested, placed on casamino acid-peptone-glucose (CPG) medium, and incubated at 28°C. After 48 h, only yellow colonies were observed and 12 isolates were selected for further characterization. Physiological and biochemical tests indicated that the isolates were nonfluorescent on King's B medium, and API 50 CHE (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) revealed that they were negative for gelatin hydrolysis, indole production, acid production from raffinose and positive for utilization of glycerol, D-glucose, mannitol, arbutine, esculine, salicine, cellobiose, maltose, melibiose, D-fucose, and D-arabitol; all characteristics of Pantoea agglomerans. Further identification of these isolates was accomplished by DNA analysis. For DNA analysis, 1.4-kbp fragments of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified with primer set 8F/1492R (3) and sequenced with U514F/800R universal primers (2). Five sequences were obtained and deposited in GenBank (Accession Nos. EF050806 to EF050810). A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the UPGMA method (mega version 3.1). Results of the phylogenetic analysis grouped the species P. ananatis, P. stewartti, and P. agglomerans into three clusters. The five unknown sequences were grouped into the P. agglomerans cluster. There was a 98 to 99% similarity of the five 16S rRNA gene sequences with P. agglomerans strain type ATCC 27155. Pathogenicity of the 12 isolates was confirmed by injecting 108 CFU mL-1 of inoculum into stems of 3-week-old maize cv. Triunfo and sorghum cold tolerant hybrid (A1×B5)×R1 seedlings in the greenhouse at 28°C and 80% relative humidity. Also, seedlings were inoculated with water, nonpathogenic isolates of P. agglomerans from maize (GM13, and HLA1), and not inoculated as negative controls. Three replications were included for each isolate and control. All test strains developed water-soaked lesions on juvenile leaves at 8 days postinoculation and were followed by chlorotic to straw-colored leaf streaks and then leaf blight symptoms at 3 weeks postinoculation. All negative control seedlings did not develop symptoms. In addition, the 12 isolates were infiltrated at 107 CFU mL-1 into tobacco leaves that displayed a hypersensitive response at 4 days, indicating the presence of the type III secretion system (1). Isolates were reisolated, and the 16S rRNA gene fragments were 100% similar to their original isolate sequences. P. agglomerans has been reported to affect other crops, including chinese taro in Brazil (2007), onion in the United States (2006) and South Africa (1981), and pearl millet in Zimbabwe (1997); however, to our knowledge, this is the first report of P. agglomerans associated with leaf blight and vascular wilt symptoms in maize and sorghum in the Central Highland Valley of Mexico. References: (1) J. Alfano and A. Collmer. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol 42:385, 2004. (2) Y. Anzai et al. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:1563, 2000. (3) M. Sasoh et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:1825, 2006.