The effect of social frailty on mental health and quality of life in older people: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate anxiety, depression, loneliness, death anxiety, and quality of life and investigate their relationship with social frailty in the geriatric population. Additionally, it aimed to identify social frailty predictors. METHODS: The study included 136 participants admitted to the geriatric outpatient clinic. The 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G), the Templer Death Anxiety Scale (T-DAS), the Loneliness Scale for the Elderly (LSE), the Quality of Life Scale (CASP-19), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Test (GAD-7), the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), the FRAIL Scale, and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) were performed. The TFI was used to collect data about social frailty. RESULTS: There were 61.8% females, and the median age (min-max) was 72.2 (65.3-90.3) years. The prevalence rate of social frailty was 26.7%. The rates of depression, loneliness, anxiety, death anxiety, the burden of chronic disease, and frailty were higher in the social frailty group. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis revealed a strong relationship between social frailty status and widowhood (odds ratio (OR) 6.86; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.42-19.37; p < 0.001), moderate to severe anxiety symptoms (OR 4.37; 95% CI 1.08-17.68; p = 0.038), and a TFI-physical frailty score (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.12-1.73; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In older adults, the social dimension of frailty is associated with quality of life and psychological state. Physical frailty and sociodemographic characteristics may affect the development of social frailty.

Which comorbidity index is more appropriate for geriatric patients from the frailty perspective?

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between comorbidity indices and physical, psychologic and social frailty and 1-year mortality. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 136 community-dwelling older adults. The relationship of 4 comorbidity indices (CIRS-G, ACCI, GIC, ICED) with 3 different frailty scales (FRAIL, CFS, TFI) was examined. RESULTS: The participants' median age was 72 years (65-90); 62% of the participants were female. Overall, 15.4% of the participants were living with frailty according to the FRAIL scale, 27.9% of them according to the CFS, 58.8% of them according to the TFI, 47.7% of them living with psychological frailty, and 28.6% of them living with social frailty. There were significant and moderate correlations between CIRS-G and FRAIL, CFS and TFI total scores, TFI-Psychological scores and TFI-Social scores (respectively; p < 0.001, r = 0.530; p < 0.001, r = 0.471; p < 0.001, r = 0.535; p < 0.001, r = 0.402; p = 0.016 r = 0.206). AUC for CIRS-G was calculated as 0.716 among comorbidity indices in predicting the presence of frailty according to the FRAIL scale (p = 0.002, 95%CI [0.60-0.82]), 0.765 according to the CFS (p < 0.001, 95%CI [0.66-0.86]), 0.746 according to the TFI (p < 0.001, 95%CI [0.66-0.82]). CONCLUSION: The CIRS-G index was found to be superior to other indices in predicting the presence of frailty of comorbidity indices, and only GIC scores showed significant results in predicting mortality. However, it would not be the right approach to recommend a single comorbidity index when evaluating older adults.