High Circulating Dipeptidyl Peptidase 3 Predicts Mortality and Need for Organ Support in Cardiogenic Shock: An Ancillary Analysis of the ACCOST-HH Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is burdened with high mortality. Efforts to improve outcome are hampered by the difficulty of individual risk stratification and the lack of targetable pathways. Previous studies demonstrated that elevated circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (cDPP3) is an early predictor of short-term outcome in CS, mostly of ischemic origin. Our objective was to investigate the association between cDPP3 and short-term outcomes in a diverse population of patients with CS. METHODS AND RESULTS: cDPP3 was measured at baseline and after 72 hours in the AdreCizumab against plaCebO in SubjecTs witH cardiogenic sHock (ACCOST-HH) trial. The association of cDPP3 with 30-day mortality and need for organ support was assessed. Median cDPP3 concentration at baseline was 43.2 ng/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.2-74.0 ng/mL) and 77 of the 150 patients (52%) had high cDPP3 over the predefined cutoff of 40 ng/mL. Elevated cDPP3 was associated with higher 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.9), fewer days alive without cardiovascular support (aHR, 3 days [95% CI, 0-24 days] vs aHR, 21 days [95% CI, 5-26 days]; P < .0001) and a greater need for renal replacement therapy (56% vs 22%; P < .0001) and mechanical ventilation (90 vs 74%; P = .04). Patients with a sustained high cDPP3 had a poor prognosis (reference group). In contrast, patients with an initially high but decreasing cDPP3 at 72 hours had markedly lower 30-day mortality (aHR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.084-0.34), comparable with patients with a sustained low cDPP3 (aHR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12-0.41). The need for organ support was markedly decreased in subpopulations with sustained low or decreasing cDPP3. CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms the prognostic value of cDPP3 in a contemporary population of patients with CS.

Systemic Hemodynamics, Cardiac Mechanics, and Signaling Pathways Induced by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Cardiogenic Shock Model.

Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly being used in patients suffering from refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Although considered life-saving, peripheral VA-ECMO may also be responsible for intracardiac hemodynamic changes, including left ventricular overload and dysfunction. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may also increase myocardial wall stress and stroke work, possibly affecting the cellular cardioprotective and apoptosis signaling pathways, and thus the infarct size. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of increasing the peripheral VA-ECMO blood flow (25-100% of the baseline cardiac output) on systemic and cardiac hemodynamics in a closed-chest CS model. Upon completion of the experiment, the hearts were removed for assessment of infarct size, histology, apoptosis measurements, and phosphorylation statuses of p38 and protein Kinase B (Akt), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinases (ERK-MAPK). Peripheral VA-ECMO restored systemic perfusion but induced a significant and blood flow-dependent increase in left ventricular preload and afterload. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation did not affect infarct size but significantly decreased p38-MAPK phosphorylation and cardiac myocyte apoptosis in the border zone.

Multidisciplinary cardiogenic shock team approach improves the long-term outcomes of patients suffering from refractory cardiogenic shock treated with short-term mechanical circulatory support.

AIMS: Short-term mechanical circulatory support (STMCS) may be used as an intentional escalation strategy to treat refractory cardiogenic shock (rCS). However, with growing technical possibilities, making the right choice at the right time can be challenging. We established a shock team in January 2013 comprising a cardiac anaesthetist-intensivist, an interventional cardiologist, and a cardiac surgeon. Since then, a diagnosis of rCS has triggered a multidisciplinary team meeting based on a common algorithm. This study aimed to compare the decision-making process for STMCS for rCS before (2007-2013) and after (2013-2019) the creation of the shock team. METHODS AND RESULTS: This before-and-after cohort study was conducted over a 156-month period. Post-cardiotomy rCS were excluded. The primary outcome was a 1-year survival rate. In total, 250 consecutive adult patients were included in the analysis (84 in the control group and 166 in the shock team group). At baseline, the CardShock score was not different between the two groups (5[3-5] vs. 5[4-6], P = 0.323). The 1-year survival rate was significantly higher in the shock team group compared with the control group (59% vs. 45%, P = 0.043). After a Cox regression analysis, the shock team intervention was independently associated with a significantly improved 1-year survival rate (HR: 0.592, 95% CI: 0.398-0.880, P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary shock team-based decision for STMCS device implantation in rCS is associated with better 1-year survival rates.