Leptin, ghrelin, & insulin levels and food intake in premenstrual syndrome: A case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between food intake and serum levels of leptin and ghrelin in the luteal (LP) and follicular (FP) phases of the MC (menstrual cycle) in participants with and without PMS (premenstrual syndrome). METHODS: This was a case-control study with healthy participants aged 20-45 years with regular menstrual cycles (24-35 days) with and without PMS. After the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) was filled out for two months (PMS diagnosis), a nutritional assessment was carried out based on twelve food intake records (for two menstrual cycles) to quantify food intake. RESULTS: Of the 69 participants analyzed, 35 experienced PMS and 34 did not experience PMS. For participants with PMS, calorie and carbohydrate intake was higher during LP than in FP (p = 0.004 and p = 0.003, respectively), whereas these changes were not observed in participants without PMS (p > 0.05). There were interactions between the groups and the MC phases (LP and FP) for the intake of calories (p = 0.028) and carbohydrates (p = 0.001). There was a marginal negative relationship between the levels of ghrelin and calorie intake in FP (rS = -0.314, p = 0.066) in the PMS group and a negative relationship between the levels of ghrelin and leptin in LP (rS = -0.490, p = 0.004) in the group without PMS. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated a higher calorie and carbohydrate intake during LP in participants with PMS, in addition to the hypothesis that the roles of ghrelin and leptin in energy regulation may be different in participants with PMS compared to those without PMS.

Premenstrual syndrome diagnosis: A comparative study between the daily record of severity of problems (DRSP) and the premenstrual symptoms screening tool (PSST) / Diagnóstico de síndrome pré-menstrual: um estudo comparativo entre o relato diário da gravidade dos problemas (DRSP) e o instrumento de rastreamento de sintomas pré-menstruais (PSST)

Abstract Objective To validate the premenstrual symptoms screening tool (PSST) in relation to the daily record of severity of problems (DRSP) for premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) diagnoses. Methods A cross-sectional study with 127 women (20 45 years) with PMS complaints. The women were evaluated in terms of weight, height and body mass index (BMI). After using the primary care evaluation of mental disorders (PRIME-MD) questionnaire to exclude the diagnosis of depression, the PSST was completed and the women were instructed to fill out the DRSP for two consecutive menstrual cycles. The agreement between the two questionnaires was assessed by the Kappa (k) and the prevalence-adjusted, bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) values. Results Two-hundred and eighty-two women met the eligibility criteria and answered the PSST. The DRSP was completed for two cycles by 127 women. The percentages of women with PMS and PMDD diagnoses by the DRSP were 74.8% and 3.9% respectively; by PSST, the percentages were41.7% and 34.6% respectively. The number of patients considered "normal" (with symptoms below the threshold for the diagnosis of PMS) was similar in both questionnaires. There was no agreement (Kappa = 0.12) in the results of PMS/ PMDD diagnosis (the PABAK coefficient confirmed this result = 0.39). The PSST had a high sensitivity (79%) and a low specificity (33.3%) for PMS/PMDD diagnosis. Conclusion The PSST should be considered a diagnostic screening tool. Positive PMS/PMDD cases by PSST should be further evaluated by DRSP to confirm the diagnosis.

Resumo Objetivo Validar o instrumento de rastreamento de sintomas pré-menstruais (PSST) em relação ao relato diário da gravidade dos problemas (DRSP) para o diagnóstico de síndrome pré-menstrual (SPM) e de transtorno disfórico pré-menstrual (TDPM). Métodos Um estudo transversal com 127 mulheres entre 20 e 45 anos com queixas de SPM. As mulheres foram avaliadas quanto ao peso, à altura e ao índice de massa corporal (IMC). Depois de excluir o diagnóstico de depressão pelo questionário de avaliação de distúrbios mentais para atenção primária (PRIME-MD), o PSST foi respondido e as mulheres receberam orientações sobre como preencher o DRSP por dois meses. A concordância entre os dois questionários foi conduzida através do índice de Kapa (k) e pelo PABAK. Resultados Duzentos e oitenta e duas mulheres com critérios elegíveis responderam ao PSST. O DRSP foi preenchido por dois ciclos por 127 mulheres. As porcentagens de mulheres com diagnósticos de SPM e de TDPM pelo DRSP foram de 74,8% e 3,9%, respectivamente; pelo PSST, as porcentagens foram de 41,7% e 34,6%, respectivamente. O número de pacientes consideradas "normais" (com sintomas abaixo do necessário para o diagnóstico de SPM) foi similar nos dois questionários. Análises demonstraram não haver concordância entre ambos os instrumentos para os resultados diagnósticos de SPM e TDPM (Kappa = 0,12, coeficiente de PABAK = 0,39). Para o diagnóstico de SPM/TDPM, o PSST apresentou uma alta sensibilidade (79%) e baixa especificidade (33,3%). Conclusão O PSST é considerado uma ferramenta de triagem. Conclui-se que casos positivos de SPM/TDPM pelo PSST devem ser melhor investigados pelo DRSP para confirmar o diagnóstico.

Premenstrual Syndrome Diagnosis: A Comparative Study between the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) and the Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool (PSST).

OBJECTIVE: To validate the premenstrual symptoms screening tool (PSST) in relation to the daily record of severity of problems (DRSP) for premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) diagnoses. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with 127 women (20-45 years) with PMS complaints. The women were evaluated in terms of weight, height and body mass index (BMI). After using the primary care evaluation of mental disorders (PRIME-MD) questionnaire to exclude the diagnosis of depression, the PSST was completed and the women were instructed to fill out the DRSP for two consecutive menstrual cycles. The agreement between the two questionnaires was assessed by the Kappa (k) and the prevalence-adjusted, bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) values. RESULTS: Two-hundred and eighty-two women met the eligibility criteria and answered the PSST. The DRSP was completed for two cycles by 127 women. The percentages of women with PMS and PMDD diagnoses by the DRSP were 74.8% and 3.9% respectively; by PSST, the percentages were41.7% and 34.6% respectively. The number of patients considered "normal" (with symptoms below the threshold for the diagnosis of PMS) was similar in both questionnaires. There was no agreement (Kappa = 0.12) in the results of PMS/ PMDD diagnosis (the PABAK coefficient confirmed this result = 0.39). The PSST had a high sensitivity (79%) and a low specificity (33.3%) for PMS/PMDD diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The PSST should be considered a diagnostic screening tool. Positive PMS/PMDD cases by PSST should be further evaluated by DRSP to confirm the diagnosis.

OBJETIVO: Validar o instrumento de rastreamento de sintomas pré-menstruais (PSST) em relação ao relato diário da gravidade dos problemas (DRSP) para o diagnóstico de síndrome pré-menstrual (SPM) e de transtorno disfórico pré-menstrual (TDPM). MéTODOS: Um estudo transversal com 127 mulheres entre 20 e 45 anos com queixas de SPM. As mulheres foram avaliadas quanto ao peso, à altura e ao índice de massa corporal (IMC). Depois de excluir o diagnóstico de depressão pelo questionário de avaliação de distúrbios mentais para atenção primária (PRIME-MD), o PSST foi respondido e as mulheres receberam orientações sobre como preencher o DRSP por dois meses. A concordância entre os dois questionários foi conduzida através do índice de Kapa (k) e pelo PABAK. RESULTADOS: Duzentos e oitenta e duas mulheres com critérios elegíveis responderam ao PSST. O DRSP foi preenchido por dois ciclos por 127 mulheres. As porcentagens de mulheres com diagnósticos de SPM e de TDPM pelo DRSP foram de 74,8% e 3,9%, respectivamente; pelo PSST, as porcentagens foram de 41,7% e 34,6%, respectivamente. O número de pacientes consideradas "normais" (com sintomas abaixo do necessário para o diagnóstico de SPM) foi similar nos dois questionários. Análises demonstraram não haver concordância entre ambos os instrumentos para os resultados diagnósticos de SPM e TDPM (Kappa = 0,12, coeficiente de PABAK = 0,39). Para o diagnóstico de SPM/TDPM, o PSST apresentou uma alta sensibilidade (79%) e baixa especificidade (33,3%). CONCLUSãO: O PSST é considerado uma ferramenta de triagem. Conclui-se que casos positivos de SPM/TDPM pelo PSST devem ser melhor investigados pelo DRSP para confirmar o diagnóstico.

Transposição de grandes vasos corrigida congenitamente e gestação: relato de caso / Congenitally corrected transposition of great vessels and pregnancy: case report

Este é um relato de caso com discussão dos desfechos materno-fetais de gestantes com transposição de grandes vasos congenitamente corrigida (TGVCC). Gestante com transposição de grandes artérias congenitamente corrigida TGACC, internada com 35 semanas de gestação por dispneia e cianose central, evoluindo para parto vaginal com fórcipe e recebendo alta com recém-nascido clinicamente estável. A mesma paciente é internada novamente após 1 ano, gestante e com as mesmas queixas, apresentando dor precordial no trabalho de parto. Foi indicada cesárea por desproporção cefalopélvica. Teve alta clinicamente estável. Os recém-nascidos não apresentaram malformações cardíacas. Em conclusão, gestantes portadoras de TGACC devem receber atenção multidisciplinar diferenciada devido à gestação de alto risco, tendo indicação de parto normal assistido e monitorado, visando diminuir a morbimortalidade materna.

Case report and discussion of maternal-fetal outcomes in pregnant patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great vessels (CCTGV). A pregnant woman with CCTGV was hospitalized at 35 weeks of gestation for dyspnea and central cyanosis. Her baby was born via forceps delivery and was clinically stable when discharged from hospital. The patient returned to the hospital 1 year later. She was pregnant and presented the same complaints, with precordial pain during labor. Cesarean delivery was indicated due to dystocia. She was clinically stable when discharged from hospital. Both newborns did not have cardiac malformations. Pregnant patients suffering from CCTGV should receive multidisciplinary attention due to the high-risk pregnancy, with recommendation of assisted and monitored vaginal labor to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.