Preoperative radiochemotherapy and radical resection for stages II to IV oral and oropharyngeal cancer: grade of regression as crucial prognostic factor.

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of histological response to preoperative radiochemotherapy in an established multimodal therapy concept for advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Two hundred and twenty-two patients who underwent preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT: 50 Gy, mitomycin C and fluorouracil) and radical surgery were retrospectively evaluated. Resected tumours of all patients were histologically analysed and response to RCT was classified in histopathological grades of regression (RG). In a multivariate statistical analysis, RG was compared with established factors regarding their predictive value for overall and disease-specific survival. The 5-year overall survival probability in the different groups of histopathological regression grades were: RG1 (no vital tumour): 73.4%, RG2 (minimal tumour remnants encompassing less than 5%): 72.1%, RG3 (5-50% vital tumour cells): 41.9%, RG4 (more than 50% vital tumour): 37.9%. For disease-specific survival probability no significant differences were found between both groups of "responders" (RG1 and RG2) nor between "non-responders" (RG3 and RG4), whereas responders and non-responders differed significantly from each other (log-rank test; p < 0.001). T-classification, N-classification and disease stage, histological grading, tumour site, age, and sex had less prognostic value than RG in a Cox regression model. In the neoadjuvant multimodal therapy concept, histological response to preoperative RCT is a crucial prognostic factor even when surgical R0-resection is accomplished. Thus, non-responders have to be regarded as high-risk patients for recurrence and may benefit from further therapy.

[Isolated fractures of the orbital floor]. / Isolierte Orbitabodenfrakturen. Korrelation von CT-Vermessungsdaten und ophthalmologischen Daten.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this retrospective study was quantitative calculation of area and volume of isolated orbital floor fractures from computed tomography (CT) and correlation of these data with post-traumatic ophthalmologic findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 76 patients with isolated orbital floor fractures were evaluated radiologically and clinically. CT scanning was performed in coronal sections (1.5-mm to 3.0-mm slice thickness) with contiguous table feed. Orbital floor and fracture area as well as volume of displaced tissue were measured and calculated from the CT dataset. The relation of quantitative CT data to ophthalmologic findings (motility, diplopia, and globe position) was assessed statistically. RESULTS: Calculation of the CT dataset revealed a mean orbital floor area of 6.33+/-1.05 cm(2), a mean fracture area of 2.60+/-1.14 cm(2), and a mean volume of displaced tissue of 1.16+/-0.80 cm(3). Volume of displaced tissue correlated significantly with ophthalmologic findings (p< or =0.01). Fracture area correlated significantly with globe position (p< or =0.01) and was less associated with diplopia and motility disturbances (p<0.10). CONCLUSION: Efficient evaluation of two-dimensional CT data enables quantitative assessment of orbital floor fractures. Position and function of the globe are mainly affected by the volume of displaced periorbital tissue.

Follow-up study of treatment of orbital floor fractures: relation of clinical data and software-based CT-analysis.

This retrospective study quantifies isolated orbital floor fractures using software-based CT-analysis and compares the clinical outcome across surgical and non-surgical treatment groups. Depending on the surgeon's interpretation of the clinical and radiological appearance, 10 fractures were treated non-surgically and 20 fractures surgically, either with antral balloon catheter alone or in combination with an orbital implant. Ophthalmologic findings were evaluated until 12 weeks after injury. Fracture area, and volume of displaced tissue (VDT) were assessed by software-based CT-analysis. VDT was marginally significantly smaller in non-surgically than in surgically-treated patients (P=0.08). Ophthalmologic findings improved in all groups during follow-up and no statistical difference was found between the groups. Diplopia remained moderate in three patients with balloon catheter alone, and minimal in four patients in both surgical groups. In one patient with non-surgical treatment, diplopia remained minimal after 12 weeks. Although CT-analysis revealed no significant difference between both surgical groups, patients treated with balloon catheter alone presented more diplopia after 12 weeks. Using balloon catheters for fracture repair a combined approach should be performed when large fractures involve the orbital floor to achieve sufficient reduction of orbital content and placement of an orbital implant. Software-based CT-analysis is helpful for objective interpretation in managing of orbital fractures.