Implementation of a geriatric care bundle for older adults with acute burns.

BACKGROUND: Frailty and comorbidities are important outcome determinants in older patients (age ≥65) with burns. A Geriatric Burn Bundle (Geri-B) was implemented in 2019 at a regional burn center to standardize care for older adults. Components included frailty screening and protocolized geriatric co-management, malnutrition screening with nutritional support, and geriatric-centered pain regimens. METHODS: This study aimed to qualitatively evaluate the implementation of Geri-B using the Proctor Framework. From June-August 2022, older burn-injured patients, burn nurses, and medical staff providers (attending physicians and advanced practice providers) were surveyed and interviewed. Transcribed interviews were coded and thematically analyzed. From May 2022 to August 2023, the number of inpatient visits aged 65 + with a documented frailty screening was monitored. RESULTS: The study included 23 participants (10 providers, 13 patients). Participants highly rated Geri-B in all implementation domains. Most providers rated geriatric care effectiveness as 'good' or 'excellent' after Geri-B implementation. Providers viewed it as a reminder to tailor geriatric care and a safeguard against substandard geriatric care. Staffing shortages, insufficient protocol training, and learning resources were reported as implementation barriers. Many providers advocated for better bundle integration into the hospital electronic health record (EHR) (e.g., frailty screening tool, automatic admission order sets). Most patients felt comfortable being asked about their functional status with strong patient support for therapy services. The average frailty screening completion rate from May 2022 to August 2023 was 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Geri-B was perceived as valuable for the care of older burn patients and may serve as a framework for other burn centers.

Availability of Pharmacist-Prescribed Contraception in Hawai'i.

In 2017, the state of Hawai'i passed Act 067 which allows trained pharmacists to prescribe hormonal contraceptives in an effort to expand access to contraception. The extent to which this policy has been implemented is not known. This study aimed to determine the proportion of Hawai'i pharmacies that currently provide pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraceptives. In June 2020, a list of retail pharmacies was compiled using Google and Google Maps searches and pharmacy directories from major health insurance providers. Between June 23, 2020, and July 2, 2020, two trained interviewers called pharmacies and inquired about the availability of pharmacist-prescribed contraceptives using a "secret shopper" technique. Of the 175 pharmacies included in our analysis, 54 (31%) offered pharmacist-prescribed contraceptives. Kaua'i (40%) had the highest proportion of pharmacies offering pharmacist-prescribed contraceptives, followed by Maui (35%), O'ahu (30%), and Hawai'i Island (29%) (P=.88). Among pharmacies located in rural communities, 20 of 63 (32%) prescribed contraceptives, compared to 34 of 112 (30 %) pharmacies located in urban communities (P=.85). Of the 118 pharmacies that did not prescribe contraceptives and provided a reason for not doing so 33% cited lack of training and 28% lack of knowledge about Act 067. Thirty-one pharmacies provided information on the cost of pharmacist-prescribed contraceptives with 71% (22) stating that the patient would have to pay extra for the consultation (mean cost = $34.6, range $30-$45). Findings from this study can help inform future public health policies and implementation strategies aimed at improving contraceptive access in Hawai'i.

College Students' Reasons for Using JUULs.

PURPOSE: To identify reasons that college students use JUUL and explore associations between reasons for using JUUL and social and behavioral (tobacco use) factors. DESIGN: On-line, cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Large southwestern university in the US. SUBJECTS: Undergraduate students (n = 605) who owned JUUL and used it weekly. MEASURES: The study measured age of JUUL initiation, JUUL dependence, and use of other e-cigarettes and other tobacco products. Participants described reasons for JUUL use as brief open-ended responses. ANALYSIS: Responses were categorized by 2 researchers using an inductive procedure. Logistic regressions examined associations between demographics and use frequency and categorized reasons for using JUUL. RESULTS: Four reasons for using JUUL emerged: self-help (48.4%), social (30.4%), experience (42.8%), and substance use/addiction (42.3%). Daily JUUL users were 1.66 (95% CI: 1.05-2.63) times as likely to use JUUL for self-help than those who used JUUL 1-3 days/week. Those who had never tried a cigarette were twice (OR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.22-3.54) as likely as cigarette-first users to use JUUL for social reasons. Males (OR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.32-2.65) had higher odds of using JUUL for the experience than females, and JUUL and other e-cigarettes users were 4.37 (95% CI: 1.83-10.45) times as likely as JUUL-only users to use JUUL due to substance use/addiction. CONCLUSION: JUUL users report unique reasons for use (e.g., addiction) not previously reported for older models of e-cigarette devices.

Young Adult JUUL Users' Beliefs About JUUL.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test beliefs (risks to individual health, tobacco industry affiliation, and harm to others) with young adult current JUUL users to prompt decreased JUUL use. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed-method design was used. Undergraduates aged 18-24 years at a large southwest university who owned and used a JUUL at least once a week completed an online survey (n = 667) in March 2019. Participant reactions to 6 JUUL-specific statements (harm to lungs and brain, tobacco industry ownership, communication device inside JUUL, harm to others and the environment) were assessed. Then, 51 participants completed an in-person interview 1-2 weeks later to explain what influenced their responses. RESULTS: Across beliefs, females were more likely and those who used other tobacco products were less likely to say they would reduce JUUL use. Beliefs about harm to the brain, others, and the environment had the most influence on interview participants. Tobacco industry affiliation with JUUL was not viewed negatively and likely would not affect participant decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Messaging developed for other tobacco products may not have the same impact with young adult JUUL users. These findings provide guidance to tobacco use regulators by informing marketing message regulations to prevent initiation or prolonged use of JUUL and other pod-based products.