RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the volumetric abrasive wear of a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (hvGIC; Equia Fil) and a glass hybrid restorative system (ghRS; Equia Forte), each being recommended as amalgam alternatives. Both materials were applied with or without their respective resinous coating, and were compared with a conventional GIC (Ketac Fil) and a hybrid composite resin (CR; G-ænial Posterior). METHODS: 78 standardized occlusal Class I cavities were restored with the various materials (nâ¯=â¯13 per group). Before and after chewing simulation (30,000 cycles at 40â¯N), each sample underwent optical scanning procedures (Omnicam). A comparison of the total wear using a fluorescence-aided identification technique (OraCheck) followed, and differences (αâ¯=â¯5%) between groups were compared by means of MANOVA. RESULTS: Regarding the wear rates of hvGIC and ghRS, no differences could be observed (pâ¯>â¯.050), and this was not affected by the resinous coating. All hvGIC and ghRS restorations showed significantly higher abrasive wear than CR (pâ¯<â¯.001), while the conventional GIC displayed a significant underperformance compared with any other material (pâ¯<â¯.001). CONCLUSIONS: Resinous coating of hvGIC or ghRS does not appear to exert an effective long-term protection against advanced abrasive wear. Compared to the conventional GIC showing a considerable substance loss, both hvGIC and ghRS materials revealed an improved abrasion resistance, but clearly failed to meet the excellent values of the CR. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Occlusal loading should be carefully considered when using hvGIC or ghRS as amalgam (or composite resin) alternatives for the restoration of posterior teeth.