Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Surg ; 33(7): 1368-73, 2009 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19430829

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has become popular during the last decade, mainly because it is associated with fewer postoperative complications than the conventional open approach. It remains unclear, however, if this benefit is observed after laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU). The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether laparoscopic closure of a PPU is as safe as conventional open correction. METHODS: The study was based on a randomized controlled trial in which nine medical centers from the Netherlands participated. A total of 109 patients with symptoms of PPU and evidence of air under the diaphragm were scheduled to receive a PPU repair. After exclusion of 8 patients during the operation, outcomes were analyzed for laparotomy (n = 49) and for the laparoscopic procedure (n = 52). RESULTS: Operating time in the laparoscopy group was significantly longer than in the open group (75 min versus 50 min). Differences regarding postoperative dosage of opiates and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scoring system were in favor of the laparoscopic procedure. The VAS score on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 was significant lower (P < 0.05) in the laparoscopic group. Complications were equally distributed. Hospital stay was also comparable: 6.5 days in the laparoscopic group versus 8.0 days in the open group (P = 0.235). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair of PPU is a safe procedure compared with open repair. The results considering postoperative pain favor the laparoscopic procedure.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparotomia/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Úlcera Péptica Perfurada/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Probabilidade , Medição de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Obes Surg ; 17(4): 533-9, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17608267

RESUMO

Eating behavior is determined by a balance of memories in terms of reward and punishment to satisfy the urge to consume food. Refilling empty energy stores and hedonistic motivation are rewarding aspects of eating. Overfeeding, associated adverse GI effects, and obesity implicate punishment. In the current review, evidence is given for the hypothesis that bariatric surgery affects control over eating behavior. Moreover, any caloric overload will reduce the feeling of satiety. Durable weight loss after bariatric surgery is probably the result of a new equilibrium between reward and punishment, together with a better signaling of satiation due to beneficial metabolic changes. We propose to introduce three main treatment goals for bariatric surgery: 1) acceptable weight loss, 2) improvement of eating control, and 3) metabolic benefit. To achieve this goal, loss of 50% to 70% of excess weight will be appropriate (i.e. 30% to 40% loss of initial weight), depending on the degree of obesity prior to operation.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Metabolismo Energético , Comportamento Alimentar , Obesidade/metabolismo , Obesidade/psicologia , Redução de Peso/fisiologia , Humanos , Obesidade/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA