RESUMO
To clinically evaluate the patient satisfaction and associated costs of dentures made using a simplified procedure that eliminates assembly on the articulator and dentures made with the conventional technique. Single-blind randomised clinical trial. Forty edentulous patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. One group received dentures made using the conventional method (CG), and the other using a simplified technique (SG) that omits the use of functional impressions (with modelling compound and ZOE impression paste) and an articulator to assemble the models. Overall patient satisfaction was assessed at 3 and 6 months by means of a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The comparisons were made using a repeated measures ANOVA (P = .05). No significant differences were found in terms of the satisfaction stated by the patients or the quality of the prosthesis evaluated by a professional among the dentures made using the traditional (n = 17) and simplified (n = 21) techniques. The rehabilitation of an edentulous patient with a simplified technique for the preparation of a total prosthesis is a feasible, more economical alternative and accepted by most patients.
Assuntos
Técnica de Moldagem Odontológica , Planejamento de Dentadura , Prótese Total , Boca Edêntula/reabilitação , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnica de Moldagem Odontológica/economia , Planejamento de Dentadura/economia , Retenção de Dentadura , Prótese Total/economia , Estética Dentária , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Cryocooled insulin and thaumatin crystals were irradiated in a series of alternating data collections and high-dose-rate exposures using either a vertically focused or vertically defocused beam. The main result is that the radiation damage is limited to the exposed region, which can be explained by the short range of the photoelectrons and the Auger electron cascade produced by light elements. Consequently, the unexposed angular range provides significantly improved data quality and electron density compared with previously exposed angular wedges of the crystal when a vertically focused beam is used, while no differences are observed between a fresh wedge and an exposed region for the vertically defocused beam. On the other hand, the focused beam provides higher I/sigma(I) ratios at high resolution than homogeneous sample illumination but also causes more rapid sample deterioration.
