RESUMO
Recently published data have shown that an extended lymphadenectomy during the en bloc esophagectomy leads to a significant increased long-term survival for esophageal adenocarcinoma. On the other hand some studies indicate that the increased survival is based on stage migration and that the surgical complication rate is increased after extended lymphadenectomy. The aim of this review was to give an overview about all aspects of an extended lymphadenectomy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. The review of the literature shows clearly that the number of involved lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, an extended lymphadenectomy leads to an increased long-term survival. Some studies describe that 23 lymph nodes should be removed to predict survival; other studies 18 lymph nodes or 15 lymph nodes. Opponents indicate that the survival benefit is based on stage migration. The studies with a large study population have performed a Cox regression analyzes and identified the number of lymph nodes removed as an independent factor for improved survival, which means it is significant independently from other parameters. Under these circumstances is stage migration not an option to explain the survival benefit. An important difficulty is, that there is no standardized definition of an extended lymphadenectomy, which means the localization and number of removed lymph nodes differ depending from the performing centre. The controversies regarding the survival benefit of the lymphadenectomy is based on the lack of standardisation of the lymphadenectomy. The main goal of further studies should be to generate a clear definition of an extended lymphadenectomy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/normasRESUMO
The necessity of pyloroplasty after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up is debated. Disadvantages of a standard pyloroplasty include the potential for leak, shortening of the length of the graft, and complexity when done during a minimally invasive procedure. The aim of this study is to report our experience with a novel internal pyloroplasty technique using a circular stapler (CS pyloroplasty), which is applicable for both laparoscopic and open esophagectomy. The records of all patients who underwent an esophagectomy with gastric pull-up and pyloroplasty between 2002 and 2007 were reviewed. The CS pyloroplasty was performed through a lesser curve gastrotomy with a 21-mm CS, while the standard pyloroplasty entailed a longitudinal full thickness incision through the pylorus with mucosal closure in the same direction and a Graham patch. A CS pyloroplasty was performed in 144 and a standard pyloroplasty in 133 patients. The median patient age was 66years, and the median follow-up was 17months, and was similar for both types of pyloroplasty. Routine postoperative videoesophagram was significantly more likely to show a delay in contrast transit through the pylorus after standard pyloroplasty (16% standard vs. 8% CS pyloroplasty, P= 0.03). Significantly more patients had postoperative endoscopy after standard pyloroplasty (40% standard vs. 24% CS pyloroplasty, P= 0.004), but the frequency of pyloric dilatation was similar. There were no leaks with either technique. A circular stapled pyloroplasty is as efficacious as a standard pyloroplasty after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up. Potential advantages include the ease and simplicity of the procedure along with virtually no risk of a leak and no graft shortening. The technique is amenable to both open and minimally invasive procedures.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Piloro/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura , Idoso , Transtornos de Deglutição/etiologia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estômago/transplante , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentaçãoRESUMO
Because of changes in life expectancy, there is an increasing number of elderly patients with esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of esophagectomy for cancer in patients 80 years or older. A retrospective review was performed of the records of all patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer from 1992 to 2007. A cardiac and pulmonary evaluation was obtained on an individual basis in the younger patients and in all octogenarians. Among 560 patients with esophagectomy for cancer, 47 patients (8%) were octogenarians. The median age of the younger group (n= 513) was 63 years (interquartile range 56-71). Octogenarians had significantly more stage III disease (49% vs 31%, P= 0.02) but received less neoadjuvant therapy than younger patients (2% vs 21%, P= 0.0004). In octogenarians, the transhiatal resection was more common than in the younger group (79% vs 36%, P < 0.0001). Weight loss prior to surgery was similar in both groups, but body mass index was significantly lower in octogenarians (25 vs 28 kg/m(2) , P= 0.0002). Major complications occurred in 26% in octogenarians and 31% in the younger group (P= 0.51). Hospital mortality was similar (9% for octogenarians vs 4% in the younger group, P= 0.13). The median postoperative hospital stay was similar at 16 days (P= 0.69). There was no difference in cancer-related survival (median survival 48.9 vs 59.3 months, P= 0.31 log-rank test). Esophagectomy can be performed safely in carefully selected octogenarians with good cardiac and pulmonary function. Patients should not be denied an esophagectomy based only on their age.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/fisiopatologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomia , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Índice de Massa Corporal , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Testes de Função Cardíaca , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Testes de Função Respiratória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Identifying gastroesophageal reflux disease as the cause of respiratory and laryngeal complaints is difficult and depends largely on the measurements of increased acid exposure in the upper esophagus or ideally the pharynx. The current method of measuring pharyngeal pH environment is inaccurate and problematic due to artifacts. A newly designed pharyngeal pH probe to avoid these artifacts has been introduced. The aim of this study was to use this probe to measure the pharyngeal pH environment in normal subjects and establish pH thresholds to identify abnormality. METHODS: Asymptomatic volunteers were studied to define the normal pharyngeal pH environment. All subjects underwent esophagram, esophageal manometry, upper and lower esophageal pH monitoring with a dual-channel pH catheter and pharyngeal pH monitoring with the new probe. Analyses were performed at 0.5 pH intervals between pH 4 and 6.5 to identify the best discriminating pH threshold and calculate a composite pH score to identify an abnormal pH environment. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 55 normal subjects. The pattern of pharyngeal pH environment was significantly different in the upright and supine periods and required different thresholds. The calculated discriminatory pH threshold was 5.5 for upright and 5.0 for supine periods. The 95th percentile values for the composite score were 9.4 for upright and 6.8 for supine. CONCLUSION: A new pharyngeal pH probe which detects aerosolized and liquid acid overcomes the artifacts that occur in measuring pharyngeal pH with existing catheters. Discriminating pH thresholds were selected and normal values defined to identify patients with an abnormal pharyngeal pH environment.