Targeted Combined Endpoint Improvement in Patient and Disease Domains in Atopic Dermatitis: A Treat-to-Target Analysis of Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Upadacitinib.

A treat-to-target approach was recently developed to guide systemic treatment for adults with atopic dermatitis (AD). Recommendations outlined criteria for a 3-month initial acceptable treatment target and a 6-month optimal target, evaluated using global assessment of patient-reported disease severity, as well as Eczema Area and Severity Index, itch assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale, Dermatology Life Quality Index, or Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure. Achievement of these targets with once-daily upadacitinib (15 mg and 30 mg) monotherapy was evaluated using integrated adult data from the Measure Up 1 and 2 phase 3 studies. Among the 852 patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg, the 3-month initial acceptable target was achieved by >80%, >78%, and ≥87% of patients, and the 6-month optimal target was achieved by ≥53%, >61%, and >73% of patients at weeks 2, 16, and 52, respectively. Achievement of all 6 individual criteria for each of the target goals also increased over time. These findings suggest that upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg may help improve standards of care in patients with moderate-to-severe AD by achieving 6-month target goals at 16 weeks and as early as 2 weeks for most patients.

Aggregate Response Benefit in Skin Clearance and Itch Reduction With Upadacitinib or Dupilumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis®.

Background: In patients with moderate-to-severe atopic Dermatitis® (AD), greater skin clearance and itch reduction are associated with more pronounced improvements in quality of life (QoL). Objective: To characterize the aggregate response benefit with upadacitinib versus dupilumab or placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: Degree of skin clearance and itch response in 3 phase 3 studies (Heads Up [NCT03738397] and Measure Up 1/2 [integrated; NCT03569293/NCT03607422]) were assessed by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS), respectively, using mutually exclusive categories. The aggregate response benefit with upadacitinib over dupilumab or placebo was determined by summing incremental differences for each EASI or WP-NRS category across the full distribution of patient responses. Results: Comparisons across EASI improvement threshold distributions, EASI severity levels, and WP-NRS categories demonstrated an aggregate response benefit favoring upadacitinib over dupilumab as early as week 4 and continuing at weeks 16 and 24. Similar trends were observed for upadacitinib 15 and 30 mg versus placebo. Conclusions: The aggregate response benefit in skin clearance and itch reduction favored upadacitinib 30 mg over dupilumab and upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg over placebo. These benefits may translate to overall greater improvements in patient QoL.

Venous thromboembolism risk is lower in patients with atopic dermatitis than other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A retrospective, observational, comparative cohort study using US claims data.

BACKGROUND: Certain immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) may increase patients' risk for venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), yet how atopic dermatitis (AD) influences VTE risk remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Describe VTE incidence in patients with AD compared with other IMIDs and unaffected, AD-matched controls. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, comparative cohort study used Optum Clinformatics United States claims data (2010-2019) of adults with AD, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Unaffected control patients were matched 1:1 with patients with AD. RESULTS: Of 2,061,222 patients with IMIDs, 1,098,633 had AD. Patients with AD had a higher VTE incidence (95% CI) than did unaffected, AD-matched controls (0.73 [0.72-0.74] versus 0.59 [0.58-0.60] cases/100 person-years). When controlling for baseline VTE risk factors, however, AD was not associated with increased VTE risk (HR 0.96 [0.90-1.02]). VTE risk was lower in patients with AD versus RA, UC, CD, AS, or PsA; VTE risk was similar to patients with PsO. LIMITATIONS: Disease activity and severity were not accounted for. CONCLUSION: AD did not increase VTE risk when accounting for underlying risk factors. AD was associated with lower VTE risk compared with several rheumatologic and gastrointestinal IMIDs.