Are popular books about diet and health written based on scientific evidence? A comparison of citations between the USA and Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the references cited in popular books about diet and health between the USA and Japan. DESIGN: Books were selected based on their best-seller rankings in the diet and health category of online bookstores. We identified references throughout all pages of the books and examined the number of references, reference format (identifiable or not) and presence of specific types of references, such as systematic reviews of human research. We compared the characteristics of references between the two countries and examined related factors to citation. SETTING: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Books (n 100 in each country). RESULTS: Among 100 books from each country, sixty-five US and sixty-six Japanese books had references. Forty-five US books cited more than 100 references, against only five Japanese books. The number of books that cited systematic reviews of human research differed between the USA (n 49) and Japan (n 9). Additionally, the number of books that provided identifiable information for all references was significantly higher in the USA (n 63) than in Japan (n 42). Books whose first authors have licences of medical doctors were more likely to cite references than those without in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of books about diet and health cited references in both the USA and Japan, but Japanese books cited fewer references and were less likely to cite systematic reviews and provide identifiable references than US books. Further research into the scientific reliability of information in books about diet and health is warranted.

Extended phase-correlated rescanning irradiation to improve dose homogeneity in carbon-ion beam liver treatment.

We previously reported that an adequate number of simple layered phase-correlated rescanning (PCR) irradiations improve dose conformation to a moving target. However, if PCR is not completed within a single gating window due to the particular irradiation specifications selected in advance and/or layer size, the iso-energy layer is completed using next gating window, and the effect of rescanning is effectively nullified. To solve this problem, we developed extended PCR irradiation. Extended PCR is conceptually based on simple PCR. It differs in that the dose rate is adjusted to irradiate the number of rescans within multiple gating windows when simple PCR is not finished within a single gating window. This process is repeated until the total prescribed dose is given. Here, 4DCT imaging was performed under free-breathing conditions in 10 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. 4D dose distributions for a single field approach were performed with simple PCR and extended PCR using 4DCT. A total dose of 11.25 Gy(RBE) was administered to the field-specific target volume. The number of rescans was changed from 1 to 10. Respiratory gating of a 30% duty cycle around exhalation was applied. Dose assessment metrics (CTV-D95, CTV-Dmin, CTV-Dmax) with PCR improved with an increasing number of rescans, and largely plateaued at five or more rescans. Minimum D95 and Dmin values, and maximum Dmax and HI values fluctuated at odd and even numbers of rescans. Extended PCR improved all dose assessment metrics whereas PCR did not. Values with extended PCR were mostly constant with three or more rescans, or in other words independent of the number of rescans. Extended PCR improved dose conformation to a moving target with greater efficacy than simple PCR when more than two gating windows were necessary. Extended PCR can be applied to irradiation machines having a low maximum dose rate.

Influence of nuclear interactions in polyethylene range compensators for carbon-ion radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: A recent study revealed that polyethylene (PE) would cause extra carbon-ion attenuation per range shift by 0.45%/cm due to compositional differences in nuclear interactions. The present study aims to assess the influence of PE range compensators on tumor dose in carbon-ion radiotherapy. METHODS: Carbon-ion radiation was modeled to be composed of primary carbon ions and secondary particles, for each of which the dose and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) were estimated at a tumor depth in the middle of spread-out Bragg peak. Assuming exponential behavior for attenuation and yield of these components with depth, the PE effect on dose was calculated for clinical carbon-ion beams and was partly tested by experiment. The two-component model was integrated into a treatment-planning system and the PE effect was estimated in two clinical cases. RESULTS: The attenuation per range shift by PE was 0.1%-0.3%/cm in dose and 0.2%-0.4%/cm in RBE-weighted dose, depending on energy and range-modulation width. This translates into reduction of RBE-weighted dose by up to 3% in extreme cases. In the treatment-planning study, however, the effect on RBE-weighted dose to tumor was typically within 1% reduction. CONCLUSIONS: The extra attenuation of primary carbon ions in PE was partly compensated by increased secondary particles for tumor dose. In practical situations, the PE range compensators would normally cause only marginal errors as compared to intrinsic uncertainties in treatment planning, patient setup, beam delivery, and clinical response.

First experience of carbon-ion radiotherapy for early breast cancer.

Breast cancer is increasingly being detected at earlier stages, and partial breast irradiation for patients with low-risk-group tumor has come to be applied in the US and Europe as an alternative to whole-breast irradiation. Based on those experiences, some institutes have tried using particle beams for partial breast irradiation for postoperative or radical intent for early breast cancer, but technical difficulties have hindered its progress. The National Institute of Radiological Sciences has been preparing for carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) with radical intent for stage I breast cancer since 2011, and we carried out the first treatment in April 2013. In this case report, we explain our first experience of C-ion RT as a treatment procedure for breast tumor and present the radiation techniques and preliminary treatment results as a reference for other institutes trying to perform the same kind of treatment.

Evaluation of plastic materials for range shifting, range compensation, and solid-phantom dosimetry in carbon-ion radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Beam range control is the essence of radiotherapy with heavy charged particles. In conventional broad-beam delivery, fine range adjustment is achieved by insertion of range shifting and compensating materials. In dosimetry, solid phantoms are often used for convenience. These materials should ideally be equivalent to water. In this study, the authors evaluated dosimetric water equivalence of four common plastics, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polyoxymethylene (POM). METHODS: Using the Bethe formula for energy loss, the Gottschalk formula for multiple scattering, and the Sihver formula for nuclear interactions, the authors calculated the effective densities of the plastics for these interactions. The authors experimentally measured variation of the Bragg peak of carbon-ion beams by insertion of HDPE, PMMA, and POM, which were compared with analytical model calculations. RESULTS: The theoretical calculation resulted in slightly reduced multiple scattering and severely increased nuclear interactions for HDPE, compared to water and the other plastics. The increase in attenuation of carbon ions for 20-cm range shift was experimentally measured to be 8.9% for HDPE, 2.5% for PMMA, and 0.0% for POM while PET was theoretically estimated to be in between PMMA and POM. The agreement between the measurements and the calculations was about 1% or better. CONCLUSIONS: For carbon-ion beams, POM was dosimetrically indistinguishable from water and the best of the plastics examined in this study. The poorest was HDPE, which would reduce the Bragg peak by 0.45% per cm range shift, although with marginal superiority for reduced multiple scattering. Between the two clear plastics, PET would be superior to PMMA in dosimetric water equivalence.