Relationship between device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and heart failure in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a leading preventable cause of heart failure (HF) for which early detection and treatment is critical. Subclinical-AF is likely to go untreated in the routine care of patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis of our study is that subclinical-AF is associated with HF hospitalization and increasing an inappropriate therapy. METHODS: We investigated 153 patients with an ejection fraction less than 35%. We divided into three groups, subclinical-AF (n = 30), clinical-AF (n = 45) and no-AF (n = 78). We compared the baseline characteristics, HF hospitalization, and device therapy among three groups. The follow-up period was 50 months after classification of the groups. RESULTS: The average age was 66 ± 15 years and the average ejection fraction was 26 ± 8%. Inappropriate therapy and biventricular pacing were significantly different between subclinical-AF and other groups (inappropriate therapy: subclinical-AF 13% vs clinical-AF 8.9% vs no-AF 7.7%: P = .04, biventricular pacing: subclinical-AF 81% vs clinical-AF 85% vs no-AF 94%, P = .001). Using Kaplan-Meier method, subclinical-AF group had a significantly higher HF hospitalization rate as compared with other groups. (subclinical-AF 70% vs clinical-AF 49% vs no-AF 38%, log-rank: P = .03). In multivariable analysis, subclinical-AF was a predictor of HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical-AF after CRT-D implantation was associated with a significantly increased risk of HF hospitalization. The loss of the biventricular pacing and increasing an inappropriate therapy might affect the risk of HF hospitalization.

J-Wave Elevation in the Inferior Leads Predicts Lethal Ventricular Arrhythmia Initiated by Premature Ventricular Contractions With Right Bundle Branch Block and Superior Axis.

BACKGROUND: Lethal ventricular arrhythmia (VA) can be initiated by idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) originating from the left ventricular (LV) inferior wall. Furthermore, J-wave elevation in the inferior leads on ECG is sometimes associated with lethal VA. However, the relationship between these PVCs and J-wave elevation in patients with lethal VA is unclear, so we investigated it in the present study.Methods and Results:We studied 32 consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency (RF) ablation of idiopathic PVCs with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and superior axis. Thee PVCs were originating from the inferior wall of the LV. Lethal VA was defined as ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) with loss of consciousness (LOC). Among 32 patients, 3 had VF and 2 had VT with LOC. Other 27 had non-lethal VA. Baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly difference between lethal and non-lethal VA. The ratio of J-wave elevation in lethal VA was significantly higher as compared with non-lethal VA (100% vs. 11.1%, P<0.0001). Furthermore, no patients with J-wave elevation in the inferior leads had recurrence of lethal VA after RF ablation of the PVCs. CONCLUSIONS: We speculate that J-wave elevation in the inferior leads might be a predictor of lethal VA initiated by PVCs with RBBB and superior axis. RF ablation of these PVCs was a useful method of treating lethal VA.

Idiopathic basal crux ventricular arrhythmias with left bundle branch block and superior axis: A comparison with inferior-septal valvular arrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) with superior axis is common in patients with idiopathic-ventricular arrhythmia (VA) originating from the tricuspid annulus (TA) and rarely from the cardiac basal crux and mitral annulus (MA). We described the electrocardiography and electrophysiological findings of idiopathic-VA presenting with LBBB and superior axis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We described 42 idiopathic-VA patients who had an LBBB and superior axis; 15 basal crux-VA, 17 TA-VA, and 10 MA-VA. No patient had a structural heart disease. Among patients with idiopathic-VA referred for ablation, we investigated the electrocardiogram and clinical characteristics of basal crux-VA as compared with other LBBB and superior axis-VA. The left ventricular ejection fraction with MA-VA was significantly lower in comparison with basal crux-VA (P = .01). All patients had a positive R wave in lead I and aVL. The maximum deflection index with basal crux-VA was significantly higher in comparison with TA-VA or MA-VA (P = .01). Patients with basal crux-VA presented with QS wave in lead II more frequently as compared with TA-VA or MA-VA (P = .001). All MA-VA patients had Rs wave in V6, and basal crux-VA, and TA-VA patients had a monophasic R wave or Rs wave in V6. Basal crux-VA patients underwent ablation in the middle cardiac vein (MCV) or coronary sinus (success rate: 94%, recurrence rate: 6%). CONCLUSIONS: We could distinguish basal crux-VA, TA-VA, and MA-VA, using a combination of clinical and electrocardiographic findings. These findings might be useful for counseling patients about an ablation strategy. Ablation via the MCV is effective for eliminating basal crux-VA.

Association left ventricular lead and ventricular arrhythmias after upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: There are some controversial reports related to the pro-arrhythmic or anti-arrhythmic potential of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and little is known about the relationship between ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and left ventricular (LV)-lead threshold. HYPOTHESIS: Upgrade CRT is anti-arrhythmic effect of VA with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients and has a relationship with the incident of VA and LV-lead threshold. METHODS: Among 384 patients with the implantation of CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D), 102 patients underwent an upgrade from ICD to CRT-D. We divided patients into three groups; anti-arrhythmic effect after upgrade (n = 22), pro-arrhythmic effect (n = 14), and unchanging-VA events (n = 66). The VA event was determined by device reports. We described the electrocardiography parameters, LV-lead characteristics, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Before upgrade, the numbers of VA were 305 episodes and the numbers of ICD therapy were 157 episodes. While after upgrade, the numbers of VA were 193 episodes and the number of ICD therapy were 74 episodes. Ventricular tachycardia cycle length (VT-CL) after upgrade was significantly slower as compared to those with before upgrade. Pro-arrhythmic group was significantly higher with delta LV-lead threshold (after 1 month-baseline) as compared to those with anti-arrhythmic group (0.74 vs -0.21 V). Furthermore, pro-arrhythmic group was significantly bigger with delta VT-CL (after 3 months-before 3 months) as compared to those with anti-arrhythmic group (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: We described upgrade-CRT was associated with reduction of VA, ICD therapies and VT-CL. While 14 patients had a pro-arrhythmic effect and LV lead threshold might be associated with VA-incidents.

Predictors of Mortality, Rehospitalization for Syncope and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Cardiovascular Syncope.

BACKGROUND: Predictors of poor outcomes remain unknown for cardiovascular syncope patients after discharge.Methods and Results:We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients admitted to hospital with cardiovascular syncope. We then performed Cox stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify significant independent factors for death, rehospitalization for syncope, and cardiovascular events. The study group was 206 patients with cardiovascular syncope. Of them, bradycardia was diagnosed in 50%, tachycardia in 27%, and structural disease in 23%. During a 1-year follow-up period, 18 (8%) and 45 (23%) patients, respectively, were rehospitalized for syncope or a cardiovascular event, and 10 (4%) died. Independent predictors of cardiovascular events were systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (odds ratio [OR] 3.25; 95%confidence interval [CI] 1.41-7.51, P=0.006) and implantation of a pacemaker (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.51, P=0.0005) (inverse association). Drug-induced syncope (OR 4.57; 95% CI 1.54-12.8, P=0.007) was an independent risk factor for rehospitalization. Finally, a history of congestive heart failure (OR 11.0; 95% CI 2.78-54.7, P=0.0006) and systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (OR 5.40; 95% CI 1.30-22.7, P=0.02) were identified as significant independent prognostic factors for death. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-induced syncope, hypotension, no indication for a pacemaker, and a history of congestive heart failure are risk factors post-discharge for patients with cardiovascular syncope and careful follow-up of these patients for at least 1 year is recommended.

Effects of Aging on the Coagulation Fibrinolytic System in Outpatients of the Cardiovascular Department.

BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials demonstrate that the elderly with atrial fibrillation have risks of thrombosis and bleeding, the relationship between aging and coagulation fibrinolytic system in "real-world" cardiology outpatients is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated 773 patients (mean age: 58 years; 52% men; Asian ethnicity). To thoroughly investigate markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis, we simultaneously measured levels of D-dimer, prothrombin-fragment1+2 (F1+2), plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), and thrombomodulin (TM). There were correlations between aging and levels of F1+2, D-dimer, PIC, and TM (R=0.61, 0.57, 0.49, and 0.30, respectively). We compared 3 age groups, which were defined as the Y group (<64 years), M group (65-74 years), and the O group (>75 years). Levels of markers were higher in older individuals (D-dimer: 1.0±0.8 vs. 0.8±0.8 vs. 0.6±0.4 µg/ml, F1+2: 281.8±151.3 vs. 224.6±107.1 vs. 155.5±90.0 pmol/L, PIC: 0.9±0.3 vs. 0.8±0.3 vs. 0.6±0.5 µg/ml, and TM: 2.9±0.8 vs. 2.7±0.7 vs. 2.5±0.7FU/ml). We performed logistic regression analysis to determine F1+2 and PIC levels. Multivariate analysis revealed that aging was the most important determinant of high F1+2 and PIC levels. CONCLUSIONS: Hypercoagulable states develop with advancing age in "real-world" cardiology outpatients. (Circ J 2016; 80: 2133-2140).