Effects of Calcium Polystyrene Sulfonate Formulation Change from Dry Syrup to Oral Solution in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Calcium polystyrene sulfonate, a cation exchange resin preparation, is used to treat hyperkalaemia. The effects of switching from dry syrup to oral solution forms have been rarely evaluated. We investigated changes in serum potassium levels, incidence of adverse events, and patients' perception and satisfaction associated with the change in calcium polystyrene sulfonate dosage forms from dry syrup to oral solution in chronic kidney disease patients. The study population was comprised of 24 patients. The chronic kidney disease cause, glomerular filtration rate category, and albuminuria category was G4 in 10 cases (41.7%) and G5 in 8 cases (33.3%). No significant difference was observed between groups before and after the change in dosage form. Contrastingly, the ease of intake (P=0.0047), taste (P=0.0056), and satisfaction (P<0.001) indicated positive significant improvements. Changing the calcium polystyrene sulfonate dosage form from dry syrup to oral solution in patients with chronic kidney disease improved patient satisfaction while maintaining efficacy and safety. For patients in whom weight gain is not a problem, we recommend changing the dosage form from dry syrup to oral solution for calcium polystyrene sulfonate.

Relationship between compliance with management target values and renal prognosis in multidisciplinary care for outpatients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Although multidisciplinary care (MDC) is necessary for controlling chronic kidney disease (CKD), its impact on compliance with management target values in the CKD guidelines remains unclear. This study was designed to clarify the relationship between compliance with management target values and renal prognosis in CKD outpatients who received MDC. METHODS: There were 255 outpatients with pre-dialysis CKD who received MDC. Achievement rates of systolic, and diastolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, uric acid, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and hemoglobin A1c values determined according to CKD guidelines were compared before and 12 months after MDC. In addition, after dividing achievement rates of the target values at 12 months after MDC into four groups (A < 30% ≤ B < 60% ≤ C < 80% ≤ D), dialysis initiation and renal survival rates were compared. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the overall achievement rate from 62.8 to 69.1% (p < 0.001). The higher the achievement rate after MDC, the lower the dialysis initiation rate (A 72.7%, B 35.3%, C 20.5%, D 8.2%, p < 0.001). There was also a significantly higher renal survival rate (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that MDC for CKD raised awareness of health literacy, and improved the achievement rate of target values. Furthermore, the higher the achievement rate, the later the initiation of dialysis, which led to improvement of renal survival. CONCLUSIONS: MDC can improve compliance with management target values for CKD, suggesting that it may improve renal prognosis.

Effect of multidisciplinary care of dialysis initiation for outpatients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: The aim of comprehensive multidisciplinary care (MDC) by the chronic kidney disease (CKD) team is not only to prevent worsening renal function, but also provide education on the selection of renal replacement therapy (RRT) by shared decision making (SDM). The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of MDC for predialysis outpatients on dialysis therapy, especially with regard to peritoneal dialysis (PD). METHODS: This study evaluated 112 CKD patients who underwent dialysis at our hospital starting from 2012, with 53 outpatients receiving MDC from the CKD team and 59 outpatients not receiving MDC. Annual decreases in the estimated glomerular filtration rates (ΔeGFR), the duration from the time of intervention to dialysis initiation, the urgent dialysis rate using a temporary catheter, and the PD selection rate were compared and examined between the two groups. The ΔeGFR, the duration from intervention to PD initiation, and the PD retention rate were compared between 18 PD patients in the MDC group and 10 PD patients in the non-MDC group. RESULTS: The MDC group had a significantly lower ΔeGFR, significantly longer duration, and a significantly lower urgent dialysis initiation rate versus the non-MDC group. Moreover, there was a significantly higher PD selection rate, significantly prolonged duration, and significantly higher PD retention rate. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary CKD team care for outpatients is effective in delaying the progression of CKD and avoiding the initiation of urgent dialysis; contributing to improved PD selectivity and continuity by SDM.

Retrospective cohort study of the efficacy and safety of dabigatran: real-life dabigatran use including very low-dose 75 mg twice daily administration.

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor and an anticoagulant that is prescribed to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) is non-inferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. A dose reduction to 110 mg twice daily should be considered for patients with decreased renal function, elderly patients, and those with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding. A small number of patients are prescribed 75 mg twice daily; however, excessive dose reduction below that indicated on the package insert may decrease the effectiveness of dabigatran. In this study, we investigated the incidence of thromboembolic events and hemorrhagic complications in patients receiving different doses of dabigatran, including patients receiving the very low-dose of 75 mg twice daily. METHODS: Five hospitals in Meguro and Setagaya areas of Tokyo were included in this study. The subjects were patients receiving dabigatran in the hospitals from March 2011 to February 2014. Thromboembolic events (stroke, systemic embolism, and transient cerebral ischemic attack) and hemorrhagic complications occurring before December 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 701 subjects received dabigatran during the study period: 187 patients (26.7%) received 150 mg twice daily (normal dose), 488 patients (69.6%) received 110 mg twice daily (low-dose), and 26 patients (3.7%) received 75 mg twice daily (very low-dose). Thromboembolism occurred in 4 (2.1%), 11 (2.3%), and 3 patients (11.5%), in the normal dose, low-dose, and very low-dose groups, respectively. The odds ratio of the 75 mg dose to the 150 and 110 mg doses was 5.73 (95% CI, 1.55-21.2; p = 0.009), and the incidence with the 75 mg dose was higher than that with the other doses. Although the number of events was limited, it should be noted that 3 patients in the very low-dose group had thromboembolic events. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that sufficient anticoagulation efficacy may not be maintained when the dabigatran dose is excessively reduced to 75 mg twice daily.