RESUMO
Objectives: Surgery at large teaching hospitals is reportedly associated with more favourable outcomes. However, these results are not uniformly consistent across all surgical patients. This study aimed to assess potential disparities in clinical outcomes by hospital type for patients with intestinal obstruction. Material and Methods: 2018 NIS was queried for all adult non-elective admissions for intestinal obstruction. Hospitals were classified as either smallmedium non-teaching hospitals or large teaching hospitals. Multivariate regression analyses were used to assess the association between hospital type and inpatient mortality, access to surgery, admission duration, non-home discharges, hospital costs, and postoperative complications. Results: After adjustments, admission to large teaching hospitals was not associated with a reduction in inpatient mortality (AOR= 0.73; 95% CI= 0.41- 1.31; p= 0.29), lower likelihood of surgery (AOR= 0.93; 95% CI= 0.58-1.48; p= 0.76) or increased chance of early surgery (p= 0.97). Patients admitted to large teaching hospitals had shorter hospital stays (p= 0.002) and were less likely to be discharged to other acute care hospitals (AOR= 0.94; 95% CI= 0.80-0.94; p= 0.04). Admission to large teaching hospitals was not associated with a reduction in perioperative complications (AOR= 1.04; 95% CI= 0.80- 1.28; p= 0.91) or significantly higher hospital costs (mean increase= 1518; 95% CI= 1891-4927; p= 0.38). Conclusion: Admission to large teaching hospitals does not necessarily result in better patient outcomes. Merely considering the teaching status of the hospital in isolation cannot explain the diverse outcomes observed for this condition.
RESUMO
Background Obesity, a widespread national epidemic that impacts one in three U.S. adults, is closely linked with the development and exacerbation of cardiovascular disease. The objective of this study was to assess and contrast the outcomes of adults, both obese and non-obese, who present with cardiac chest pain in the emergency department (ED). Methodology A retrospective analysis of the 2020 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample database was conducted. Multivariate regression models were utilized to examine the association between obesity and mortality, discharge disposition, number of procedures, complications, and hospital costs. Results No significant difference in mortality odds was observed between obese and non-obese patients presenting with cardiac chest pain in the ED (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.59-1.46; p = 0.736). However, obesity was found to be associated with a decreased likelihood of being discharged home from the ED (aOR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.52-0.63; p < 0.001), as well as an increased likelihood of hospital admission from the ED (aOR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.53-1.81; p < 0.001). Obesity also correlated with higher odds of non-home discharge (aOR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.54-1.97; p < 0.001), elevated mean total hospital costs (mean = $13,345 vs. $9,952; mean increase = $3,360; 95% CI = $2,816-$3,904; p < 0.001), and increased risks of cardiac arrests (aOR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.05-1.88; p < 0.001) and acute respiratory failures (aOR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.25-1.96; p < 0.001). Obese patients with cardiac pain underwent more procedures on average than non-obese patients (19 vs. 15; aOR = 3.57; 95% CI = 3.04-4.11; p < 0.001). Conclusions Obesity is associated with higher odds of hospital admission from the ED, non-home discharges, higher total hospital costs, and a greater number of procedures.
RESUMO
Background The effect of geriatric events (GEs) on outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions is poorly understood. We evaluated the prevalence and impact of GEs on clinical outcomes and resource utilization of older patients admitted with ACS. Methods Using the 2018 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample, we analyzed all elective hospitalizations for ACS in older adults (age ≥ 65 years) and a younger reference group (age 55-64). Nationally-weighted descriptive statistics were generated for GEs based on ACS subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression models controlling for comorbidities, frailty, patient procedure, and hospital-level variables were used to estimate the association of age with GEs and GEs with outcomes. Results Out of 403,760 admissions analyzed, 71.9% occurred in older adults (≥65 years). The overall rate of any GE in older adults with ACS was 3.4%. With advancing age, the number of GEs was found to significantly increase (p<0.001). After adjustments, having any GE was found to have a significant impact on mortality (adjusted OR (AOR): 1.32; 95%CI: 1.15-1.54; p < 0.001), post-myocardial infarction (MI) complications (AOR: 1.53; 95%CI: 1.36-1.71; p < 0.001), prolonged hospital stays (AOR: 2.97; 95%CI: 2.56-3.30; p < 0.001), and non-home (acute care and skilled nursing home) discharge (AOR: 1.68; 95%CI: 1.53-1.85; p < 0.001). The occurrence of GEs was also associated with a substantial increase in total hospitalization costs with a mean increase of $48,325.22 ± $5,539 (p < 0.001). A dose-response relationship was established between GEs and all outcomes. Limitations of the study included the use of retrospective data and an administrative database. Conclusion Geriatric events were found to significantly worsen outcomes for older adults with ACS. There is, therefore, a need for increased awareness and effective management of GEs in older adults to improve their health outcomes and reduce the burden on the healthcare system.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A large body of research has been conducted on the "weekend effect," which is the reportedly increased risk of adverse outcomes for patients admitted to the hospital on weekends versus those admitted on weekdays. This effect has been researched in numerous patient populations, including sub-populations of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, with varying conclusions. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether differences in in-hospital mortality, access to renal replacement therapy (RRT), time to RRT, and other important outcomes exist in patients with ESRD or patients on RRT admitted on the weekend versus weekdays. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the 2018 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients were included if they were adults with a principal or secondary diagnosis of ESRD or if they were admitted with a diagnosis related to initiation, maintenance, or complications of RRT. Patients admitted between midnight Friday and midnight Sunday were classified as weekend admissions. Primary outcome measurements included in-hospital mortality, in-hospital dialysis (peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, and continuous RRT), and renal transplantation (TP). Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay (LOS) and total hospitalization charges. RESULTS: The study included 1,144,385 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria. Compared with patients admitted on weekdays, patients with ESRD admitted on weekends had 8% higher adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03-1.13; p = 0.002), 9% lower adjusted OR of any RRT over the weekend than on weekdays (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.89-0.93; p = 0.000), lower RRT rates (within 24 hours) (adjusted OR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.70-0.73; p = 0.000), higher odds of renal TP (adjusted OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.20-1.45; p = 0.000), and higher hospitalization charges (mean adjusted increase: $1451; p = 0.07). LIMITATIONS: The limitations of the study include the use of retrospective data and an administrative database. CONCLUSION: Compared with weekday admissions, patients with ESRD admitted on weekends had higher odds of mortality, higher mean hospitalization charges, and higher odds of renal TP. They had lower overall RRT rates, and a longer time to first RRT. However, the average LOS was similar for both weekend and weekday admissions.
