Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 2023 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36603831

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Three primary neuraxial techniques reduce labor pain: epidural, dural puncture epidural (DPE), and combined spinal-epidural (CSE). This study aims to determine whether neuraxial analgesia techniques changed after the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given that a dural puncture confirms neuraxial placement, we hypothesized that DPE was more frequent in women with concerns for COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center retrospective cohort study comparing neuraxial analgesia techniques for labor and delivery pain management before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and in patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) at a maternity hospital in Dallas, Texas, with a large delivery service. Statistical analyses included the Chi-square test for categorical and Kruskal-Wallis test for nonparametric ordinal comparisons. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to assess the association between neuraxial technique and accidental dural puncture or postdural puncture headache. RESULTS: Of 10,971 patients who received neuraxial analgesia for labor, 5,528 were delivered in 2019 and 5,443 in 2020. Epidural analgesia was the most common neuraxial technique for labor pain in 2019 and 2020. There was no difference in the frequency of neuraxial analgesia techniques or the rates of accidental dural puncture or postdural puncture headaches comparing all deliveries in 2019 to 2020. Despite a significant increase in DPEs relative to epidurals in the SARS-CoV-2-positive group compared with the SARS-CoV-2-negative group in 2020, there was no significant difference in postdural puncture headaches or accidental dural punctures. CONCLUSION: The advantages of a DPE, specifically the ability to confirm epidural placement using a small gauge spinal needle, likely led to an increase in the placement of this neuraxial in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. There was no effect on the frequency of postdural puncture headaches or accidental dural punctures within the same period. KEY POINTS: · Epidural analgesia was the most common neuraxial technique for labor pain management.. · Dural puncture epidural placements increased in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients.. · Rates of postdural puncture headaches and accidental dural puncture after neuraxial placement did not change..

3.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 239, 2022 07 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35896959

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic approach has been shown to provide effective postoperative pain relief and reduce postoperative opioid consumption and opioid-associated adverse effects. While many studies have evaluated analgesic strategies for elective cesarean delivery, few studies have investigated analgesic approaches in emergent cesarean deliveries under general anesthesia. The primary aim of this quality improvement project is to evaluate opioid consumption with the use of a multimodal opioid-sparing pain management pathway in patients undergoing emergent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. METHODS: Seventy-two women (age > 16 years) undergoing emergent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia before (n = 36) and after (n = 36) implementation of a multimodal opioid-sparing pain management pathway were included. All patients received a standardized general anesthetic. Prior to implementation of the pathway, postoperative pain management was primarily limited to intravenous patient-controlled opioid administration. The new multimodal pathway included scheduled acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications and ultrasound-guided classic lateral transversus abdominis plane blocks with postoperative opioids reserved only for rescue analgesia. Data obtained from electronic records included demographics, intraoperative opioid use, and pain scores and opioid consumption upon arrival to the recovery room, at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients receiving multimodal opioid sparing analgesia (AFTER group) had lower opioid use for 72 h, postoperatively. Only 2 of the 36 patients (5.6%) in the AFTER group required intravenous opioids through patient-controlled analgesia while 30 out of 36 patients (83.3%) in the BEFORE group required intravenous opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia is associated with reduced postoperative opioid consumption after emergent cesarean delivery.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Manejo da Dor , Adolescente , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Anestesia Geral , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Melhoria de Qualidade
4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 139(3): 463-472, 2022 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35115430

RESUMO

Obstetric hemorrhage remains the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry are laboratory methods of assessing the kinetics of blood clot formation through real-time measurement of viscoelastic clot strength and may aid in management of severe hemorrhage. Although first described more than 70 years ago, viscoelastic testing devices are now available that allow for rapid point-of-care use of this technology to aid in real-time management of blood product replacement in cases of severe hemorrhage. These devices can be used to visually estimate multiple facets of hemostasis-coagulation, platelet function, and fibrinolysis-within 10-20 minutes. They have been used successfully in cardiac surgery, trauma, and liver transplantation and have potential for use in management of obstetric hemorrhage. Goals with their use include targeted transfusion of blood and its components for specific coagulation deficiencies. To date, however, published experiences with the use of these viscoelastic tests for obstetric hemorrhage have been limited. Because of the increasing use of the point-of-care tests by anesthesiologists, surgeons, and intensivists, the purpose of this report is to familiarize obstetricians with the technology involved and its use in severe hemorrhage complicating pregnancy.


Assuntos
Testes Imediatos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Tromboelastografia/instrumentação , Tromboelastografia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/sangue , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Gravidez
5.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 4(2): 100573, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35038612

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists states that the current data are insufficient to recommend tranexamic acid prophylaxis for postpartum hemorrhage. OBJECTIVE: This study's objective was to evaluate if prophylactic tranexamic acid treatment reduces the calculated blood loss when compared with a placebo in women undergoing an elective repeat cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in which the calculated blood loss was determined after administration of prophylactic doses of 1 g of tranexamic acid before skin incision and after placental delivery and standard uterotonics in women with singleton pregnancies at ≥37 weeks' gestation presenting for their second or third cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia. The primary outcome was calculated blood loss at 24 hours. The calculation was based on each participant's height, weight, and the difference in hematocrit before the start of surgery and 24 hours after delivery. Prespecified secondary outcomes were quantification of maternal coagulation activity during the perioperative course. A sample size of 50 women per group was planned (N=100) based on a meta-analysis of mean reduction in blood loss after tranexamic acid. RESULTS: A total of 723 women were screened, and 110 women were randomized as follows: 55 to the tranexamic acid group and 55 to the placebo group. The primary outcome of mean calculated blood loss was 2274±469 mL for the tranexamic acid group and 2407±388 mL for the placebo group (P>.05). For the secondary outcomes, D-dimer levels were lower in the tranexamic acid group than in the placebo group 24 hours after delivery (2.1±1.2 µg/mL vs 4.3±2.4 µg/mL; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic tranexamic acid treatment did not decrease the mean calculated blood loss. Significantly less participants had a calculated blood loss >2000 mL in the tranexamic acid group than in the placebo group and had lower levels of D-dimer at 24 hours.


Assuntos
Antifibrinolíticos , Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Ácido Tranexâmico , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Placenta , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Ácido Tranexâmico/uso terapêutico
7.
Cureus ; 13(1): e12871, 2021 Jan 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33633900

RESUMO

Epidural analgesia is an efficient method of controlling pain and has a wide spectrum of therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Potential complications may occur in a delayed fashion, can remain undiagnosed, and can be a source of significant morbidity. We present a 37-year-old woman presented with severe spontaneous occipital headaches, diplopia, and dizziness that occurred spontaneously six weeks after giving birth. Her primary method of pain control during labor was epidural analgesia. Her neurologic exam revealed a cranial nerve six palsy with ptosis, and her brain MRI demonstrated a Chiari I malformation which had not been previously diagnosed. CT myelography of the lumbar spine revealed extradural contrast extravasation within the interspinous soft tissue at L1-L2, which was the site of her prior epidural procedure. She underwent epidural blood patch administration, and her cranial nerve palsy resolved along with all of her other symptoms. The development of concurrent Chiari I malformation and cranial nerve palsy after epidural anesthesia is an exceptionally rare occurrence. Neurologic complications after epidural anesthesia are likely under-reported, since patients are often lost to follow-up or have subtle neurologic signs which can easily be missed. This frequently delayed presentation emphasizes the importance of patient education and the necessity of a detailed neurological exam when symptoms occur.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...