Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients without hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of longterm survival between prophylactic therapy and emergency therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine whether prophylactic endoscopic injection sclerotherapy prolonged survival in patients with esophageal varices complicated by liver cirrhosis in the absence of hepatocellular carcinoma, compared with emergency sclerotherapy. METHODS: The subjects included 160 patients suffering from esophageal varices complicated by liver cirrhosis without hepatocellular carcinoma. Sixty-eight patients underwent emergency therapy for bleeding varices and the remaining 92 patients underwent prophylactic sclerotherapy. All subjects continued to receive therapy until the varices disappeared. RESULTS: Five-year survival was significantly better in the prophylactic group compared with the emergency group. During the 5-year observation period, 20 of the 68 patients in the emergency group experienced rebleeding and 5 patients died as a result of rebleeding. These rates were significantly higher than those in the prophylactic group (1 of 9 patients with bleeding died among the 92 prophylactic sclerotherapy patients). Multivariate analysis showed that prophylactic therapy and Child's C hepatic function were significant factors for 5-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic sclerotherapy for esophageal varices might be more effective in prolonging longterm survival of patients complicated by liver cirrhosis in the absence of hepatocellular carcinoma, compared with emergency sclerotherapy.

Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: risk factors for survival.

GOALS: We previously showed that endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) prolonged survival in patients with esophageal varices complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver cirrhosis. Here, we evaluated risk factors that affect EIS outcomes. Among factors, the difference between prophylactic and emergency EIS was of interest, and we analyzed precisely. STUDY: Subjects were 134 patients with esophageal varices complicated by HCC and liver cirrhosis: 38 underwent emergent therapy for bleeding varices and 96 underwent prophylactic sclerotherapy. RESULTS: During 2-year observation, 22 of the 38 (57.9%) and 38 of the 96 (39.6%) died. Analysis by univariate Cox's proportional hazard model indicated that prognosis of patients receiving emergency EIS was inferior to those with prophylactic EIS. However, multivariate Cox's analysis showed that emergency EIS itself extended survivals of those with esophageal varices complicated by HCC and liver cirrhosis. Patients' hepatic function (Child-Pugh classes) and tumor sizes were also statistically significant factors for survival. Neither prophylactic nor emergency EIS prolonged survival of patients with Child C hepatic function or those with HCCs larger than 5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic sclerotherapy for esophageal varices prolongs long-term survival of patients with liver cirrhosis and HCC, better than emergency therapy. However, EIS itself had no beneficial effect on patients with poor disease status.