RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Based on the existing literature, omalizumab (OMZ) is considered a safe treatment modality in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) era. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of OMZ on CSU patients regarding COVID-19 infection. METHODS: In this retrospective study, files of CSU patients using OMZ during the COVID-19 pandemic were reviewed in terms of demographic features, medical history including COVID-19 vaccination status, clinical characteristics, pretreatment laboratory parameters, duration, and dosing regimen of OMZ treatment. Patients with a history of COVID-19 infection while on OMZ therapy and patients without COVID-19 history were compared with respect to these parameters. The urticaria activations following COVID-19 infection or vaccination were also recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients with CSU (female:male ratio = 1.8:1; mean age = 47.2 ± 15.1 years) continued to receive OMZ treatment. The median duration of OMZ treatment was 12 months (range: 6-60). Twelve patients (17.6%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 showing no exacerbation in urticaria. The duration of OMZ treatment was significantly higher in the group with COVID-19 infection history compared to patients with no history of COVID-19 (P = 0.01). Among 51 patients (75%) vaccinated against COVID-19, urticaria activation occurred in 4 patients without any recurrence following booster vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the likelihood of increased COVID-19 infection risk in the setting of long-term OMZ in CSU patients, the duration of OMZ therapy might be kept at a minimum, or a temporary interruption of the treatment period might be preferred, particularly in high-risk patients regarding COVID-19.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris (AV) may affect external appearance and significantly deteriorate the quality of life of patients. Therefore, patients make various inquiries about their disease and seek treatment options. AIMS: To investigate the social media usage habits of patients with AV concerning their diseases, and their recommendations for dermatologists related to social media use. METHODS: A total of 1609 patients with AV completed the survey prepared by the authors and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index questionnaire. The Food and Drug Administration severity scores and clinical information of the patients were noted by their physicians. RESULTS: Of the 1,489 patients who stated that they used social media, 46.31% regularly and 28.77% sometimes referred to these sources to make inquiries about AV. Social media usage for AV was statistically significantly higher in women, participants with short term and severe disease, those with a moderate income level, and those using topical treatment and cosmetics. They mostly used Google (67%), Instagram (54%), and YouTube (49%). While 76% of the participants stated that they did not share what they saw on the Internet with their doctor. Of the respondents, 18.5% were trying to contact their dermatologists through the Internet, and 69.73% would prefer experts such as dermatologists to post-AV-related content. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that patients frequently resort to social media to seek information about AV. In the changing digital world order, it is observed that there is a need for dermatologists to use social media more actively to share accurate information about AV.
