Machine learning models for predicting the onset of chronic kidney disease after surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have an elevated risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) following nephrectomy. Therefore, continuous monitoring and subsequent interventions are necessary. It is recommended to evaluate renal function postoperatively. Therefore, a tool to predict CKD onset is essential for postoperative follow-up and management. METHODS: We constructed a cohort using data from eight tertiary hospitals from the Korean Renal Cell Carcinoma (KORCC) database. A dataset of 4389 patients with RCC was constructed for analysis from the collected data. Nine machine learning (ML) models were used to classify the occurrence and nonoccurrence of CKD after surgery. The final model was selected based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), and the importance of the variables constituting the model was confirmed using the shapley additive explanation (SHAP) value and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS: The gradient boost algorithm was the most effective among the various ML models tested. The gradient boost model demonstrated superior performance with an AUROC of 0.826. The SHAP value confirmed that preoperative eGFR, albumin level, and tumor size had a significant impact on the occurrence of CKD after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a model to predict CKD onset after surgery in patients with RCC. This predictive model is a quantitative approach to evaluate post-surgical CKD risk in patients with RCC, facilitating improved prognosis through personalized postoperative care.

Development of Integrated Data Quality Management System for Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model.

The amount of research on the gathering and handling of healthcare data keeps growing. To support multi-center research, numerous institutions have sought to create a common data model (CDM). However, data quality issues continue to be a major obstacle in the development of CDM. To address these limitations, a data quality assessment system was created based on the representative data model OMOP CDM v5.3.1. Additionally, 2,433 advanced evaluation rules were created and incorporated into the system by mapping the rules of existing OMOP CDM quality assessment systems. The data quality of six hospitals was verified using the developed system and an overall error rate of 0.197% was confirmed. Finally, we proposed a plan for high-quality data generation and the evaluation of multi-center CDM quality.

Healthcare data quality assessment for improving the quality of the Korea Biobank Network.

Numerous studies make extensive use of healthcare data, including human materials and clinical information, and acknowledge its significance. However, limitations in data collection methods can impact the quality of healthcare data obtained from multiple institutions. In order to secure high-quality data related to human materials, research focused on data quality is necessary. This study validated the quality of data collected in 2020 from 16 institutions constituting the Korea Biobank Network using 104 validation rules. The validation rules were developed based on the DQ4HEALTH model and were divided into four dimensions: completeness, validity, accuracy, and uniqueness. Korea Biobank Network collects and manages human materials and clinical information from multiple biobanks, and is in the process of developing a common data model for data integration. The results of the data quality verification revealed an error rate of 0.74%. Furthermore, an analysis of the data from each institution was performed to examine the relationship between the institution's characteristics and error count. The results from a chi-square test indicated that there was an independent correlation between each institution and its error count. To confirm this correlation between error counts and the characteristics of each institution, a correlation analysis was conducted. The results, shown in a graph, revealed the relationship between factors that had high correlation coefficients and the error count. The findings suggest that the data quality was impacted by biases in the evaluation system, including the institution's IT environment, infrastructure, and the number of collected samples. These results highlight the need to consider the scalability of research quality when evaluating clinical epidemiological information linked to human materials in future validation studies of data quality.

Data Quality Assessment for Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model of Multi-Center.

The amount of research on the gathering and handling of healthcare data keeps growing. To support multi-center research, numerous institutions have sought to create a common data model (CDM). However, data quality issues continue to be a major obstacle in the development of CDM. To address these limitations, a data quality assessment system was created based on the representative data model OMOP CDM v5.3.1. Additionally, 2,433 advanced evaluation rules were created and incorporated into the system by mapping the rules of existing OMOP CDM quality assessment systems. The data quality of six hospitals was verified using the developed system and an overall error rate of 0.197% was confirmed. Finally, we proposed a plan for high-quality data generation and the evaluation of multi-center CDM quality.