Prevalence of psychiatric disorders, comorbidity patterns, and repeat offending among male juvenile detainees in South Korea: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: High rates of psychiatric disorders and comorbidities have been reported in juvenile detainees, and both phenomena are thought to contribute to repeat offending. However, research on this topic has been limited in Asian countries, like South Korea. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, comorbidity patterns, and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and repeat offending among a cross-section of youths detained in a male juvenile detention center in South Korea. METHODS: One hundred seventy-three juvenile detainees were recruited. The distribution of psychiatric disorders within the sample was estimated by applying criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV. Logistic regression was used to assess significant comorbidity patterns and relationships between psychiatric disorders and repeat offending. RESULTS: In all, 90.8% of the detainees had at least one psychiatric diagnosis, and 75.1% had psychiatric comorbidities. The most common psychiatric disorder was alcohol use disorder, followed by conduct disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Among the comorbidities present, alcohol use disorder with disruptive behavior disorder was the most common combination. The presence of two psychiatric disorders was associated with a higher rate of recidivism, and alcohol use disorder was also associated with repeat offending when combined with disruptive behavior disorders, but not with anxiety disorders, major depression, or psychotic disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Juvenile detainees evidence high rates of psychiatric disorders and comorbidities. Assessment of and intervention in psychiatric disorders, especially alcohol use disorder and comorbid alcohol use disorder with disruptive behavior disorders, may help prevent further offenses.

A pilot study on the evaluation of medical student documentation: assessment of SOAP notes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was evaluation of the current status of medical students' documentation of patient medical records. METHODS: We checked the completeness, appropriateness, and accuracy of 95 Subjective-Objective-Assessment-Plan (SOAP) notes documented by third-year medical students who participated in clinical skill tests on December 1, 2014. Students were required to complete the SOAP note within 15 minutes of an standard patient (SP)-encounter with a SP complaining rhinorrhea and warring about meningitis. RESULTS: Of the 95 SOAP notes reviewed, 36.8% were not signed. Only 27.4% documented the patient's symptoms under the Objective component, although all students completed the Subjective notes appropriately. A possible diagnosis was assessed by 94.7% students. Plans were described in 94.7% of the SOAP notes. Over half the students planned workups (56.7%) for diagnosis and treatment (52.6%). Accurate documentation of the symptoms, physical findings, diagnoses, and plans were provided in 78.9%, 9.5%, 62.1%, and 38.0% notes, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that third-year medical students' SOAP notes were not complete, appropriate, or accurate. The most significant problems with completeness were the omission of students' signatures, and inappropriate documentation of the physical examinations conducted. An education and assessment program for complete and accurate medical recording has to be developed.

Assessing clinical reasoning abilities of medical students using clinical performance examination.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the reliability and validity of new clinical performance examination (CPX) for assessing clinical reasoning skills and evaluating clinical reasoning ability of the students. METHODS: Third-year medical school students (n=313) in Busan-Gyeongnam consortium in 2014 were included in the study. One of 12 stations was developed to assess clinical reasoning abilities. The scenario and checklists of the station were revised by six experts. Chief complaint of the case was rhinorrhea, accompanied by fever, headache, and vomiting. Checklists focused on identifying of the main problem and systematic approach to the problem. Students interviewed the patient and recorded subjective and objective findings, assessments, plans (SOAP) note for 15 minutes. Two professors assessed students simultaneously. We performed statistical analysis on their scores and survey. RESULTS: The Cronbach α of subject station was 0.878 and Cohen κ coefficient between graders was 0.785. Students agreed on CPX as an adequate tool to evaluate students' performance, but some graders argued that the CPX failed to secure its validity due to their lack of understanding the case. One hundred eight students (34.5%) identified essential problem early and only 58 (18.5%) performed systematic history taking and physical examination. One hundred seventy-three of them (55.3%) communicated correct diagnosis with the patient. Most of them had trouble in writing SOAP notes. CONCLUSION: To gain reliability and validity, interrater agreement should be secured. Students' clinical reasoning skills were not enough. Students need to be trained on problem identification, reasoning skills and accurate record-keeping.

Experience of clinical skills assessment in the Busan-Gyeongnam Consortium.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to judge the quality of clinical skills assessment in Busan-Gyeongnam Consortium. METHODS: Fourth grade medical school students (n=350 in 2012 and n=419 in 2013) in the Busan-Gyeongnam Consortium were included in the study. The examination was consisted of 6 clinical performance examination (CPX) and 6 objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) stations. The students were divided into groups to take the exam in 4 sites during 3 days. The overall reliability was estimated by Cronbach alpha coefficient across the stations and the case reliability was by alpha across checklist items. Analysis of variance and between-group variation were used to evaluate the variation of examinee performance across different days and sites. RESULTS: The mean total CPX/OSCE score was 67.0 points. The overall alpha across-stations was 0.66 in 2012 and 0.61 in 2013. The alpha across-items within a station was 0.54 to 0.86 in CPX, 0.51 to 0.92 in OSCE. There was no significant increase in scores between the different days. The mean scores over sites were different in 30 out of 48 stations but between-group variances were under 30%, except 2 cases. CONCLUSION: The overall reliability was below 0.70 and standardization of exam sites was unclear. To improve the quality of exam, case development, item design, training of standardized patients and assessors, and standardization of sites are necessary. Above of all, we need to develop the well-organized matrix to measure the quality of the exam.

Up-regulation of inhibitors of DNA binding/differentiation gene during alendronate-induced osteoblast differentiation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of alendronate on the expression of Id genes in osteoblast differentiation. METHODS: C2C12 cells were treated with alendronate for various concentrations and time periods. For evaluation of alendronate-induced osteoblast differentiation in C2C12 cells, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured. The expression of osteoblast differentiation markers such as ALP, type-1 collagen (Col 1), and osteocalcin (OCN), and the expression of Id-1 and Id-2 were measured by RT-PCR. In order to understand the mechanism underlying the regulation of Id genes, the promoter region of the Id-1 gene was identified. Database analysis of the promoter region for Id-1 using known consensus sequences identified several putative response elements, including CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPß). RESULTS: Alendronate treatment significantly increased not only ALP activity but also the expression of ALP, Col 1, and OCN, Id-1 and Id-2. C/EBPß and alendronate cooperatively increased the promoter activity and expression of Id-1. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that C/EBPß-mediated Id-1 transcriptional activation may regulate alendronate-induced osteoblast differentiation of C2C12 cells.

Elevated expression of thymosin ß4, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α in early-stage cervical cancers.

Recent studies have shown that thymosin ß4 (TB-4) is highly related with tumor metastasis and angiogenesis. In addition, TB-4 induced the expression of VEGF in melanoma cells. We investigated the expression patterns of TB-4 and related angiogenic proteins, VEGF, and HIF-1α, at various stages of cervical cancers and also identified the expression pattern of these proteins in metastatic cervical cancers. Expression patterns of TB-4, VEGF, and HIF-1α were studied with tissue microarray containing 42 samples of cervical cancers. In addition, 15 cervical cancers and metastatic tumors in lymph nodes from patients who have metastatic tumors were also analyzed to confirm the role of TB-4, VEGF, and HIF -1α in cervical cancer metastasis. The expression levels of TB-4, VEGF, and HIF-1α were very weak at early cancer stages (stages 0 to 1A) but significantly increased at stage 1B. The numbers of blood vessels in tumors were also increased at stage 1B. The expression patterns of TB-4, VEGF, and HIF-1α were compared in tumors without lymph node metastasis, primary tumors with lymph node metastasis, and metastatic tumors in lymph nodes. The expression levels of TB-4, VEGF, and HIF-1α in primary tumors with lymph node metastasis and their metastatic tumors in lymph node were less than in tumors without lymph node metastasis. These data suggest that TB-4, VEGF, and HIF-1α triggered angiogensis and tumor invasiveness to surrounding tissues at early stage of cervical carcinoma but have a negative or no effect on the metastatic potential.