Learning lessons in emergency management: the 4th International Conference on Healthcare System Preparedness and Response to Emergencies and Disasters.

BACKGROUND: The International Preparedness & Response to Emergencies & Disasters (IPRED) conferences are conducted bi-annually in order to share insights and lessons learned from diverse crises. The aim of the article is to bring the IPRED conferences into better professional attention and to share the main insights that were presented in IPRED IV, which was held in January 2016. MAIN BODY: The major lessons learned included: Planning, regional/global collaboration and public-private cooperation should be implemented in developing novel technologies. International humanitarian action necessitates coordination between diverse actors concerning all potential threats. Leadership/coordination and decision-making capacities of emergency response leaders should be enhanced to ensure quality of care. Ethics in disaster management: Triage decisions must not discriminate against terrorists, even when attackers and victims are treated simultaneously. Resilience management: Establishing family and community networks increases resilience of individuals and society. Training programs & exercises must be evaluated considering cost-benefits. Human resources: Teams of experts should be transformed into expert teams. Communication: A common disaster-management language needs to be established. Social media is useful due to bi-directional communication. Civil-military cooperation should be established to facilitate a coordinated response including common terminologies and exercises. Animal sheltering: First responders and pet owners are jeopardized if animals are not included in emergency planning. Re-unification of animals with their owners should be included in response models. CONCLUSIONS: IPRED conferences provide a platform for sharing insights and lessons learned from diverse emergencies and disasters. The conferences offer a unique opportunity to share knowledge aimed at improving emergency preparedness, networking between various parties, and substantiates the knowledge and experience of all professionals who take part in the proceedings.

Assessment of hospital disaster plans for conventional mass casualty incidents following terrorist explosions using a live exercise based upon the real data of actual patients.

PURPOSE: The National Committee for Hospital Preparedness for Conventional Mass Casualty Incidents and the Hospital Preparedness Division of the Home Front Command are in charge of preparing live exercises held yearly in public hospitals in Israel. Our experience is that live exercises are limited in their ability to test clinical decision making and its influence upon incident management. A live exercise was designed upon real patient data and tested in several public hospitals. The aim of the manuscript is to describe the impact of this new format on clinical decision making in large-scale live exercises. METHODS: A database of histories, physical examination findings, laboratory results and imaging results for 420 patients treated following terrorist explosions was created using information derived from actual patient encounters. Similar information for 100 patients treated following motor vehicle accidents was also collected. Information from the database was used to create victim profiles used during the course of exercises held in eight public hospitals with 60-800-bed capacities. RESULTS: Before implementing the new injury tags, no conclusions could be made concerning the quality of clinical decision making. Conducting the exercise using the new format helped identify deficiencies in the hospital disaster plan in triage, emergency department management and in the proper utilisation of resources such as radiology, operating rooms and the secondary transfer of patients. CONCLUSION: Previous knowledge of patient diagnoses and resource needs allow the identification and quantification of deficiencies and problems identified in clinical decision making, resource utilisation and incident management.

Rapid in vivo testing of drug response in multiple myeloma made possible by xenograft to turkey embryos.

BACKGROUND: The best current xenograft model of multiple myeloma (MM) in immune-deficient non-obese diabetic/severe-combined immunodeficient mice is costly, animal maintenance is complex and several weeks are required to establish engraftment and study drug efficacy. More practical in vivo models may reduce time and drug development cost. We recently described a rapid low-cost xenograft model of human blood malignancies in pre-immune turkey. Here, we report application of this system for studying MM growth and the preclinical assessment of anticancer therapies. METHODS: Cell lines and MM patient cells were injected intravenously into embryonic veins on embryonic day 11 (E11). Engraftment of human cells in haematopoietic organs was detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and circulating free light chain. RESULTS: Engraftment was detected after 1 week in all embryos injected with cell lines and in 50% of those injected with patient cells. Injection of bortezomib or lenalinomide 48 h after cell injection at therapeutic levels that were not toxic to the bone marrow dramatically reduced MM engraftment. CONCLUSION: The turkey embryo provides a practical, xenograft system to study MM and demonstrates the utility of this model for rapid and affordable testing therapeutics in vivo. With further development, this model may enable rapid, inexpensive personalised drug screening.