Jejunogastric intussusception after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Jejunogastric intussusception (JGI) is a rare, but potentially fatal complication that can occur following gastric surgery, and the reported incidence of JGI is as low as 0.1%. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical for JGI to prevent major complications such as bowel necrosis and death. Although emergency surgery is the standard treatment, endoscopic reduction has also been reported to be effective in JGI patients without bowel necrosis. Several early recurrent cases treated with surgical or endoscopic reduction have been reported. We report an extremely rare case of JGI after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) using Child's procedure that was successfully treated with surgical reduction and fixation. CASE PRESENTATION: An 81-year-old man who had undergone PD using Child's procedure 3 years ago presented to our hospital with epigastric pain and nausea. His vital signs were stable, and abdominal examination revealed mild tenderness with a palpable mass in the mid-epigastrium. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and gastroscopy revealed a JGI of the efferent loop, and exploratory laparotomy was immediately performed. During the operation, the efferent loop showed no adhesions and was intussuscepted through the gastrojejunostomy into the gastric lumen. An incision in the anterior wall of the stomach revealed no evidence of ischemia of the intussusceptum. The efferent loop was reduced using Hutchinson's maneuver and fixed to the afferent loop to prevent a recurrence. The postoperative course was uneventful, and there was no sign of recurrence 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: JGI after PD is an extremely rare, but has severe complications. Surgery might be the optimal treatment for JGI in terms of preventing recurrence, even in cases without bowel necrosis.

Stoma creation is associated with a low incidence of midline incisional hernia after colorectal surgery: the "fighting over the fascia" theory concerning the incision and stoma hole.

PURPOSE: Parastomal hernia (PH) develops more frequently than incisional hernia (IH) after colorectal surgery with stoma. This study evaluated our hypothesis that inward traction of the fascia when closing a midline incision widens the stoma hole and increases the incidence of PH. METHODS: A total of 795 patients who underwent colorectal resection between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The risk classification was constructed from IH risk factors extracted from the non-stoma group. Then, the classification was extrapolated to the stoma group for predicting midline IH and PH. RESULTS: The incidence of IH was 5.3% in the stoma group and 12.5% in the non-stoma group (p = 0.005). PH developed in 19.6% of 97 patients with permanent stoma. The risk classification was able to predict PH without a significant difference but was well balanced in patients with permanent stoma; however, it failed to predict IH in the stoma group. CONCLUSION: The risk classification constructed from the non-stoma group was useful for predicting not midline IH but PH, suggesting that the stoma site was the most vulnerable for herniation. The "fighting over the fascia" theory between the midline incision and stoma hole may explain the causal relationship between the midline IH and PH.

The carcinoembryonic antigen ratio is a potential predictor of survival in recurrent colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) "value" itself is often useless in patients with a normal CEA level at initial presentation and those with tumor-irrelevant elevated CEA. Although the unified marker using CEA has been desirable for recurrent tumor staging as well as for primary tumor staging, little is known concerning its relationship with the survival of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer in particular. METHODS: This retrospective historical study included patients who experienced disease relapse after curative surgery for stage I-III colorectal cancer between 2006 and 2018. A total of 129 patients with recurrent disease after curative surgery for colorectal cancer were included. We focused on the CEA "ratio" (CEA-R: the ratio of the CEA level at the time of recurrence to that measured 3 months before recurrence) and aimed to evaluate the correlation between CEA-R and survival in recurrent colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Patients with a high CEA-R (≥ 2) exhibited significantly worse 2 year survival than those with a low CEA-R (< 2) (88.1% vs. 44.9%, P < 0.001), irrespective of the CEA value before primary resection. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the CEA-R (HR; 3.270, 95% CI 1.646-6.497, P = 0.001) was a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: The CEA-R is a potential marker stratifying the survival of patients with disease relapse who exhibit aggressive biology at recurrent disease foci. As a novel marker, the CEA-R would serve as a clinical guide for tailoring treatment strategies at the time of disease relapse in patients with colorectal cancer.

Indications for neoadjuvant treatment based on risk factors for poor prognosis before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The oncological benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical risk factors for poor prognosis before and after NAC for decision making regarding additional treatment in patients with LARC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined a total of 96 patients with MRI-defined poor-risk locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer treated by NAC alone between 2006 and 2018. Survival outcomes and clinical risk factors for poor prognosis before and after NAC were analyzed. RESULTS: In the median follow-up duration after surgery of 60 months (3-120), the rates of 5-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and local recurrence (LR) were 83.6%, 78.4%, and 8.2%, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, patients with cT4 disease had a significantly higher risk of poor OS (HR; 6.10, 95% CI; 1.32-28.15, P = 0.021) than those with cT3 disease. After NAC, ycN+ was significantly associated with a higher risk of poor OS (HR; 5.92, 95% CI; 1.27-27.62, P = 0.024) and RFS (HR; 2.55, 95% CI; 1.01-6.48, P = 0.048) than ycN-. In addition, patients with CEA after NAC (post-CEA) ≥ 5 ng/ml had a significantly higher risk LR (HR; 5.63, 95% CI; 1.06-29.93, P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: NAC alone had an insufficient survival effect on patients with cT4 disease, ycN+, or an elevated post-CEA level. In contrast, NAC alone is a potential treatment for other patients with LARC.

[A Case of Ascending Colon Cancer with Synchronous Unresectable Liver Metastasis Maintaining a Long-Term Stable Disease State after Discontinuing Chemotherapy].

A 73-year-old woman presenting with weight loss was diagnosed as having ascending colon cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. The liver metastasis was solitary but it occupied the medial and anterior segments. The size was over 9 cm in diameter and was located adjacent to the left, middle, and right hepatic veins, making it initially unresectable. Following surgical resection of the primary tumor, she received mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab chemotherapy, resulting in a decrease in size of the liver metastasis. During the 15 courses of chemotherapy, an allergic reaction to oxaliplatin occurred and oxaliplatin administration was stopped. Although the liver metastasis was considered to be in a stable disease state according to the RECIST criteria at the time following 32 courses of chemotherapy, we discontinued chemotherapy due to various reasons of the patient. However, the liver metastasis continues to be in the stable disease state, and has not grown for over 5 years since initiating mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab chemotherapy and for over 3 years since discontinuing the chemotherapy.

Theoretical Stable Hydraulic Section based on the Principle of Least Action.

Despite decades of effort, stable hydraulic geometry for an open channel water flow has hardly been established because of too many unknown variables for too few rational relationships. This article derives the most efficient channel cross section using calculus of variations for the given flow area at the minimum wetting perimeter length, which is equivalent to the principle of least action. Analysis indicates that water can most efficiently flow in a semi-ellipse section channel with minimum friction and erosion. Anisotropy in channel erodibility was found to be necessary in the natural stable channel characterization because gravitation force and channel bank consolidation cannot be ignored in earth surface material. This channel cross section, based on the principle of least action, may be regarded as the theoretical stable hydraulic section for erodible bed, which was comparable to the observed river cross-sections during high flow periods.