Alzheimer disease research in the 21st century: past and current failures, new perspectives and funding priorities.

Much of Alzheimer disease (AD) research has been traditionally based on the use of animals, which have been extensively applied in an effort to both improve our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease and to test novel therapeutic approaches. However, decades of such research have not effectively translated into substantial therapeutic success for human patients. Here we critically discuss these issues in order to determine how existing human-based methods can be applied to study AD pathology and develop novel therapeutics. These methods, which include patient-derived cells, computational analysis and models, together with large-scale epidemiological studies represent novel and exciting tools to enhance and forward AD research. In particular, these methods are helping advance AD research by contributing multifactorial and multidimensional perspectives, especially considering the crucial role played by lifestyle risk factors in the determination of AD risk. In addition to research techniques, we also consider related pitfalls and flaws in the current research funding system. Conversely, we identify encouraging new trends in research and government policy. In light of these new research directions, we provide recommendations regarding prioritization of research funding. The goal of this document is to stimulate scientific and public discussion on the need to explore new avenues in AD research, considering outcome and ethics as core principles to reliably judge traditional research efforts and eventually undertake new research strategies.

A mathematical model of the oral glucose tolerance test illustrating the effects of the incretins.

Despite important empirical findings, current models of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) do not incorporate the essential contributions of the incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, to glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. In order to address this deficiency, a model was, therefore, developed in which the incretins, as well as a term reflecting net hepatic glucose balance, were included. Equations modeling the changes in incretins, hepatic glucose balance, insulin and glucose were used to simulate the responses to 50 and 100 g oral glucose loads under normal conditions. The model successfully captures main trends in mean data from the literature using a simple 'lumped-parameter,' single-compartment approach in which the majority of the parameters were matched to known clinical data. The accuracy of the model and its applicability to understanding fundamental mechanisms was further assessed using a variety of glycemic and insulinemic challenges beyond those which the model was originally created to encompass, including hyper- and hypoinsulinemia, changes in insulin sensitivity, and the insulin infusion-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test.

Charting epilepsy by searching for intelligence in network space with the help of evolving autonomous agents.

The problem of demarcating neural network space is formidable. A simple fully connected recurrent network of five units (binary activations, synaptic weight resolution of 10) has 3.2 *10(26) possible initial states. The problem increases drastically with scaling. Here we consider three complementary approaches to help direct the exploration to distinguish epileptic from healthy networks. [1] First, we perform a gross mapping of the space of five-unit continuous recurrent networks using randomized weights and initial activations. The majority of weight patterns (>70%) were found to result in neural assemblies exhibiting periodic limit-cycle oscillatory behavior. [2] Next we examine the activation space of non-periodic networks demonstrating that the emergence of paroxysmal activity does not require changes in connectivity. [3] The next challenge is to focus the search of network space to identify networks with more complex dynamics. Here we rely on a major available indicator critical to clinical assessment but largely ignored by epilepsy modelers, namely: behavioral states. To this end, we connected the above network layout to an external robot in which interactive states were evolved. The first random generation showed a distribution in line with approach [1]. That is, the predominate phenotypes were fixed-point or oscillatory with seizure-like motor output. As evolution progressed the profile changed markedly. Within 20 generations the entire population was able to navigate a simple environment with all individuals exhibiting multiply-stable behaviors with no cases of default locked limit-cycle oscillatory motor behavior. The resultant population may thus afford us a view of the architectural principles demarcating healthy biological networks from the pathological. The approach has an advantage over other epilepsy modeling techniques in providing a way to clarify whether observed dynamics or suggested therapies are pointing to computational viability or dead space.