Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ESC Heart Fail ; 6(6): 1252-1261, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31647614

RESUMO

AIMS: The study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) with reference to albuminuria in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 535 CHF patients (mean 66 years, women 25%) in the control arm of our SUPPORT trial, in which we examined additive impact of olmesartan in hypertensive patients with symptomatic CHF treated with ß-blockers and/or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. We examined the association between glycaemic abnormality (assessed by 75 g of oral glucose tolerance test) and albuminuria for a composite outcome of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and HF hospitalization. IGT patients (N = 113, mean 67.2 years) were older and more frequently treated with ß-blockers compared with those with normal glucose regulation (N = 142, mean 64.0 years) and those with diabetes mellitus (N = 280, mean 65.7 years). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models revealed that, as compared with normal glucose regulation (NGR), IGT was associated with increased risk of the outcome when complicated by albuminuria [hazard ratio (HR) 2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-4.42; P = 0.019] but not when uncomplicated by albuminuria (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.35-1.60, P = 0.47) (P for interaction = 0.041). This was also the case for diabetes mellitus and albuminuria (HR 2.06; 95% CI 1.17-3.61; P = 0.012). Among IGT patients without albuminuria, 21 (29%) developed albuminuria at 1-year visit, which was again associated with poor prognosis (HR 7.36; 95% CI 1.39-38.98, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that IGT is associated with poor prognosis when complicated by albuminuria in CHF patients, demonstrating the importance of combined early stages of glucose intolerance and renal dysfunction in the management of CHF.


Assuntos
Albuminúria , Intolerância à Glucose , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Idoso , Albuminúria/complicações , Albuminúria/epidemiologia , Albuminúria/mortalidade , Glicemia/análise , Doença Crônica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidade , Feminino , Intolerância à Glucose/complicações , Intolerância à Glucose/epidemiologia , Intolerância à Glucose/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico
2.
Circ J ; 80(10): 2155-64, 2016 Sep 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27628221

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is no robust evidence of pharmacological interventions to improve mortality in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFpEF). In this subanalysis study of the SUPPORT Trial, we addressed the influence of LVEF on the effects of olmesartan in HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 1,147 patients enrolled in the SUPPORT Trial, we examined 429 patients with reduced LVEF (HFrEF, LVEF <50%) and 709 with HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%). During a median follow-up of 4.4 years, 21.9% and 12.5% patients died in the HFrEF and HFpEF groups, respectively. In HFrEF patients, the addition of olmesartan to the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and ß-blocker (BB) was associated with increased incidence of death (hazard ratio (HR) 2.26, P=0.002) and worsening renal function (HR 2.01, P=0.01), whereas its addition to ACEI or BB alone was not. In contrast, in HFpEF patients, the addition of olmesartan to BB alone was significantly associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.32, P=0.03), whereas with ACEIs alone or in combination with BB and ACEI was not. The linear mixed-effect model showed that in HFpEF, the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio was unaltered when BB were combined with olmesartan, but significantly increased when not combined with olmesartan (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LVEF substantially influences the effects of additive use of olmesartan, with beneficial effects noted when combined with BB in hypertensive HFpEF patients. (Circ J 2016; 80: 2155-2164).


Assuntos
Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/administração & dosagem , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Hipertensão , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Volume Sistólico/efeitos dos fármacos , Tetrazóis/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/dietoterapia , Hipertensão/mortalidade , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
Eur Heart J ; 36(15): 915-23, 2015 Apr 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25637937

RESUMO

We examined whether an additive treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan, reduces the mortality and morbidity in hypertensive patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, ß-blockers, or both. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint study, a total of 1147 hypertensive patients with symptomatic CHF (mean age 66 years, 75% male) were randomized to the addition of olmesartan (n = 578) to baseline therapy vs. control (n = 569). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and hospitalization for worsening heart failure. During a median follow-up of 4.4 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 192 patients (33.2%) in the olmesartan group and in 166 patients (29.2%) in the control group [hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.96-1.46, P = 0.112], while renal dysfunction developed more frequently in the olmesartan group (16.8 vs. 10.7%, HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.19-2.26, P = 0.003). Subgroup analysis revealed that addition of olmesartan to combination of ACE inhibitors and ß-blockers was associated with increased incidence of the primary endpoint (38.1 vs. 28.2%, HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.11-1.95, P = 0.006), all-cause death (19.4 vs. 13.5%, HR 1.50; 95% CI 1.01-2.23, P = 0.046), and renal dysfunction (21.1 vs. 12.5%, HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.24-2.76, P = 0.003). Additive use of olmesartan did not improve clinical outcomes but worsened renal function in hypertensive CHF patients treated with evidence-based medications. Particularly, the triple combination therapy with olmesartan, ACE inhibitors and ß-blockers was associated with increased adverse cardiac events. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov-NCT00417222.


Assuntos
Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Tetrazóis/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Doença Crônica , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...